Principles of the Stock Market : Rallies

Watch One Particular Stock Market Guru!

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:36:00 GMT

AN HISTORIC GURU VIEW. Written Friday morning, August 14^th, 2009.

Being in and around the stock market for the last 35 years -- I can’t believe it’s been that long! -- I’ve seen market gurus burn hot and cold. In my early years I was in more of a daze, doing ancillary brokerage jobs rather than following the stock market closely, just trying to figure out the whole brokerage industry. What a stock broker did, etc. Did I want to be one? Would I be recommending my own stuff? And again not being in New York city, the epicenter of finance, I was on the outside looking in. Even today that’s ones largest hurdle. So anyone wanting into the business I’d advise going where the action is, New York or another financial center like London. If not New York or London are not for you, find a big firm, say a big mutual fund family and get to its headquarters, be it in Boston or Singapore, etc. Anyway, back to point.

Granville & More. I’ve seen Joe Granville burn hot (and drop his pants to show stock quotes on his boxers and walk on water on a hidden board) and turn ice cold in popularity and heard about Jim Dines. I used to follow that curly haired woman guru, yes, that image is bringing her name back, Elaine Garzarelli. For many years I read Richard Russell, one of the deans of newsletter writers and whom I modeled my own letter after, took sample letters to numerous letter writers including Ned Davis, Dan Sullivan, Harry Schultz, Norman Fosback, Lou Navellier, .Marty Zweig, Stan Weinstein and unearthed Ted Warren’s one book (one of my favorites) and read everything I could find. I like William O’Neal’s approach and regular readers know I use and recommend his paper and its IBD 100 list. Having an economics background I gravitated to Ed Hyman’s work and read a number of economist A. Gary Shilling’s books. And read John Naisbitt’s Megatrends series with his long range projections. I’ve read and studied all the Dow theorists from Dow to Hamilton to Rhea to E. George Schaefer to Russell. I continue to read many new guys too, Alexander Elder, “Trader Vic” Sperandeo and on and on. Etc., etc. etc. Many unknown letter writers too. I really could throw a ton of names around if I sat down and reviewed my stock market library and mine and other’s old market letters. So I’ve seen many gurus come and go and burn hot and cold. But one who I continue to admire and track is Bob Prechter of Elliott Wave fame who was the #1 guru way back when. He was a major market mover like Joe Granville. While he uses charts -- which Wall Street loves to disdain, I think that’s mainstream Wall Street spinning a veil and case on the public to justify their big bucks, they all surreptitiously use ‘em -- Mr. Prechter also is now ties market swings to societal mood changes (which makes good sense to me). And is in the process of attempting to add and formalize to current investment analysis the concept of tying stock market trends to mood shifts. “Go for it Bob!”

SCHWARTZ RECOMMENDATION: TRACK MR. PRECHTER GOING FORWARD!

Anyway, I have to strongly recommend keeping one eye peeled on what Mr. Prechter is advising right now. Especially now! I’ve related the histories of Granville and Dines going terribly wrong in this letter, getting stubbornly bearish right at major market bottoms, so I realize the danger now for Prechter in remaining so adamantly bearish but I can’t fault his analysis, what he’s saying and my 35 years in the business tells me to not pooh-pooh his foresight. After reading everyone I can and adding in own my market intuition formed over those 35 years in and around the stock market, I’d say he’s on track. So I’m with him and the other bears, Jim Rogers, Marc Faber, Gary Shilling, the Comstock guys and others out there, still recommending extreme caution going forward. Remember us outsiders were bearish but correct at the July through October 2007 bull market peak while most of those bullish today were also bullish back then and missed that major top completely. Amazing! I mean even after the subprime disaster unfolding ahead became plain in August 2007 and on the head fake rally to new highs in October 2007 they remained Pollyannaishly [sic] blinded. (And no, for all you individual investor skeptics out there about Mr. Prechter’s work, and I know there’s a lot by reading the responses and comments now added at the end of most all Internet carried research, no I’m not a shill for Prechter. Never met, emailed or corresponded with him at all.)

So, yes, play this rally which will likely run longer than most bears think, but stay near the exit; somehow!

For a FREE sample of my daily, emailed stock market letter and advisory, email me at RichardStk@aol.com.

BUY CHINESE SOLAR

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:20:00 GMT

GLOBAL VIEW. China’s Growing SOLAR Niche. China’s domestic-investor only stock market, the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite continues to rise. Looks like Chinese investors are setting themselves up for more trouble after the Shanghai exchange rose some 514% from mid 2005 to October 2007, then fell -73% through October 2008. But before that next collapse happens, I see Chinese solar stocks as good buys here. Let’s review the larger picture first, then I’ll talk China and renewable energy.

Asia Bottomed Five Months Back? Remember ASIA in general hit its last bear market lows back last year. China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines all last hit lows last October, along with some Latin American developing markets like Brazil and Chile. That’s six months ago thus way past the normal three weeks to three months counterswing rally time frame. So is Asia in a new mini bull market? Other regions of the world, meaning the US and CANADA and most all of EUROPE continued lower until just last month. So by my Principle of Relative Strength, which recommends always (almost) focusing on those countries, markets, individual stocks showing relative strength or outperformance, Asia in general is the area for us to concentrate our attention on today. I previously wrote last Wednesday and Thursday how well known Bob Prechter, Jr. and his Elliott Wave International advisory service says parts of Asia are now in a big bear market RALLY phase in the cycle. Like an A wave back up which can be powerful, long lasting and sizable. And I also pointed out how “hot” and well known, Swiss investor Marc Faber is now saying buy Asia on any “setbacks” (there hasn’t really been any). And I ended last Wednesday’s report with a buy recommendation on India, offering up as one way to trade or invest, the India Fund (symbol IFN) which closed Wednesday at 18.25. IFN closed yesterday at 20.69. So in general Asia is where the best action is now. Plus regular readers will remember even before that, back on February 10^th, I recommended investing in Chinese agricultural and offered up a list of stocks which you could choose from (I bought one of the 13 stocks listed; did you buy any?). Plus a few days prior to that, I went to great effort and posted the whole 100 stocks separated by industry sector on the USX China Index for you to print out, keep and go shopping from.

China In A Sweet Spot. That’s because the Chinese government, with it’s unique, command-style quasi-free marketplace, blending capitalism and government management still has great and speedy influence. They can rapidly decide on a, any, direction for the country and quickly move down that path. Not like us here in America with our democracy. We take lots of time getting any bills passed (but when we do agree on a new law, we get better if not implementation). Of course, China still has to fight its widespread corruption and pay offs at every step forward so their implementation is harder. Still, perception is everything in the short term in the stock market so implementation problems aren’t a concern over the near term. And near term the Chinese government has just changed the laws to encourage solar (and other renewable energy like wind energy use). Back on March 26^th China “introduced a subsidy for solar projects of more than 50 kilowatts that could pave the way for increased sales of rooftop systems.” One analyst projected that this change could increase solar demand this year by 58 megawatts and 232 megawatts annually by 2012. This announcement moved Chinese solar stocks up the most ever in one day and the rally in Chinese solar is now in its third week and still looks solid. One London analyst said after the announcement that: “China has the potential to double the solar market, soak up the excess capacity that’s out there, and get manufacturers back on their expansion plans.” Another report said: “China is closing older coal-fired plants and implementing clean energy to fuel economic growth.” The government itself said its going to implement its “solar roofs program” to accelerate the application of solar energy. Schwartz View: Good for you China! Just lead by example, that’s the way to do it. Don’t worry about what other countries are doing. (What we should do here in America too regarding renewable energy.) A more recent announcement says China is writing a new renewable energy law and on that news solar and wind stocks jumped again. The essence is that China wants to increase renewable energy usage to 10% of total energy consumption by 2010 (from 7.5% in 2005). Go China Go!

BUY CHINESE SOLAR. Net, net, I recommend buying Chinese solar!

SOME CHINESE SOLAR STOCKS

Mkt Analyst Next

Symbol Company Name Price Cap Ratings EPS Business Line

STP Suntech Power Holdings 14.49 2170m 7-12-11 5/21/09 China’s largest solar manufacturer

YGE Yingli Green Energy 7.67 964m 7-6-2 5/15/09 PV modules and PV systems

LDK LDK Solar Company 8.04 928m 1-8-5 5/12/09 Multicrystalline solar wafers

JASO JA Solar Holdings 3.58 589m 6-7-4 5/11/09 Solar cells

TSL Trina Solar Ltd 13.21 388m 3-6-4 6/5/09 Solar-power products

SOLF Solarfun Power Holdings 4.73 252m 0-3-5 5/21/09 PV modules

Disclaimer! I own a small amount of Yingli Green Energy but can and do change positions without notice.

For a FREE week's sample of my complete daily letter, please email me at RichardStk@aol.com

Weekly Monday Overview

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:17:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, April 6^th, 2009: It’s Master’s week so I’m pumped up. It’s golf’s 1^st major of the year, tradition packed, for you non-golfers. Should be great with Tiger back, Phil Mickelson saying he’s playing the best golf of his life, Paddy Harrington going for his 3^rd major in a row and lots of up & comers. All I can say is wow! Even just watching this old southern flower nursery turned into a golf course in the spring, lavished with money for decades, may be worth the watching for any non-golfers out there. For me, it’s just heaven.

THE KEY QUESTION

Instead of discussing The Big Picture today, let’s focus on The Key Question. Since that’s what I keep pondering. Plus it has to be on every investor’s mind as well. “Could this rally be the start of a new bull market?” To intelligently answer -- as during every bear market rally -- necessitates rehashing all the available evidence. I can make a solid case for a cyclical bull market having just started and I can make an even more solid case that this is just a normal bounce in a Papa Bear market. Consider:

MINI BULL MARKET HAS STARTED

·        The economic stimulus is now starting to kick in which will stabilize and bounce the economy.

·        The monetary stimulus, lower interest rates, is also now kicking in and housing sales are increasing.

·        Inventories have been drawn down and need to be restocked which will pump up GDP growth near term.

·        The US and other governments have done everything possible to mitigate this downturn.

·        We now have more coordinated and get along global leadership than in many years.

·        The US economy has proven itself wonderfully resilient to shocks in recent decades.

·        Markets can counter-swing at any time for long periods, posting mini bull markets, versus primary trends.

·        Almost two years has passed since the beginning of the credit implosion back in July 2007.

·        Many independent market gurus think the March 2009 lows will last for a good while, months or longer.

·        The latest government bailout plan has more enthusiasts and support for it than previous plans.

·        Oil stopped falling back in December and is now on the rise possibility indicating growth rebounding.

·        We have recently had a number of better economic data reports from both retail and housing.

JUST A BEAR MARKET BOUNCE

·        The bear market hasn’t lasted long enough to discount all the problems that have come to light.

·        More problems, coming as bearish ripple effects and because of long lag times, are due to show up.

·        The bear market hasn’t fallen deeply enough to factor in the sudden massive shock to the global economy.

·        There hasn’t been enough overall selling or liquidation for a solid bottom. Stock and mutual fund liquidation haven’t reached previous classic big bear market bottom levels.

·        No solid bottom appears on the charts. We need a climatic sell off or a long low volume erosion to bottom.

·        Interest rates have to go up at some point, soon – either with and because of an economic rebound or from panic selling -- which normally depresses stock prices because of this new competitiveness from bonds.

·        The American consumer has suddenly stopped spending. This has slowed down business all over the world and finally exposed the global imbalances problems. Too much manufacturing in China and Asia and too much spending coming from America. Now those imbalances are being forced to readjust. Takes time.

·        The stock market is ignoring soaring unemployment. Yes, employment is a lagging indicator but continuing jobless claims isn’t. A new report just out says that in coming weeks and months, hundreds of thousands of jobless Americans will exhaust their unemployment benefits. Finally, 600,000 new job losses each month is going to add to weaker consumer spending, problems for local communities and cause negative ripple effects.

SCHWARTZ CONCLUSION: In review, we started this big bad bear market back in the year 2000. That was the peak of the last big bull market and thus the beginning of this big bear market. This is evidenced by the benchmark S&P 500 Double Topping in March 2000 and October 2007 and then subsequently and decisively breaking below October 2002’s previous decade-long lows by over 10% in March 2009. Showing that since 2000 and the ending of the Internet boom we’ve really been living on lower interest rates and big tax cuts, a false, “pump me up,” house of cards. Really not any wealth building going on, just paper shuffling to make things look great fueled by easy money credit creation. But now reality has set in. Thus, looking around, we see we’re almost nine years into a bear market which has been interspersed with one bull market, running for five years. So stocks were down almost two & a half years, up five years, now down about another one & a half years, sort of repeating The Visit of the Three Bears. In that infamous and extended bear market run of nine years, netting a -50% loss, there were two cyclical bull markets sprinkled in and surrounded and book-ended by the three bears, Baby, Mama and Papa.

My conclusion remains that this bear market is not over. But that the form and shape of it may get tricky going forward. Because the market has a history of posting cyclical or short term or mini bull markets on the way down when the bear gets ahead of itself. Which is why the stock market remains so fascinating!

THE ECONOMY

Well, the BUZZ has died down about how the economy is slowing its prior quick rate of descent. Guess because we’ve started seeing more bad economic data pop up or because the conversation has moved on. But some investors have decided an end to the economic collapse is out there, just over the horizon, so they are shifting into cyclical stocks now as a result. One can see this money rotating out of defensive sectors such as medical care, consumer staples and even gold. You know the concept, buying in advance of a recession’s end since history shows stocks rise roughly six months before the economy turns up. But if we indeed are stuck with a very mild even “anemic” economic recovery, as many figure, then stocks could also soon level off to mirror that trend as well. That is if the economic and earnings data don’t start sinking fast once again showing the economy is still sinking. For example, last Friday it was reported that the ISM Non-Manufacturing Index which now measures almost 90% of America’s economy - America now being a service oriented economy instead of a manufacturing economy - fell faster in March than in February somewhat debunking the idea that the economy has stabilized. Schwartz View: Yes, there is the possibility that economy-wise we are going to V- back up because sharp moves, in whatever areas of endeavor, are generally followed by responding sharp moves back up. We’re seeing that now in the stock market but after this bounce is over, I agree with the camp forecasting an anemic slow economic recovery.

THE STOCK MARKET

The stock market extended its rally to four straight weeks last week. We did see the first crack in this rally a week ago when the market fell sharply for two days. But then we quickly rebounded to new rally highs. That’s normal, the first crack being overcome but it does show this rally may be starting to struggle. We are getting closer to my minimum upside targets of Dow 8303 and S&P 1627, closing Friday at Dow 8017 and S&P 1621. And one can note trading volume has been slowing some, another sign of sluggishness. Or maybe cautiousness. Makes sense as we’re now moving into another corporate earnings reporting season starting tomorrow, the 1^st quarter January-March 2009 report kicking off after the close with Alcoa (AA), traditionally the first of the 30 Dow stocks to report. With the fall-off-the-cliff economy occurring early in last year’s fourth quarter, it only stands to reason that investors have to be wary of forthcoming earnings and thus wary of this rally as well. Schwartz View: It looks like the stock market has some more strength left in it so with stocks already having rallied beyond the 50% retracement level from their latest leg down, the early January peak, the teeter-totter phenomenon comes into play. Getting halfway up means it’s very likely to go all the way back up. Thus we kick off this week at roughly another key Fibonacci 61.8% price in both the Dow and S&P 500. That’s about 8088 and 838 respectively. If we break through those levels, then the next target is those January highs, Dow 9088 & S&P 944. Not guaranteed but increasingly likely.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

2009 may indeed prove to be the year to trade. If stocks fluctuate but go nowhere net, up or down, for many months ahead then it’s going to prove very frustrating for investors. In these times and they do happen, more often than the uninformed investor may realize, the best way to make profits is to: (1) trade individual stocks and (2) discipline yourself to continuously fade the market, buying on dips and selling on strength. Toward that end I’ve started incorporating the Commodity Channel Index (CCI) technical indicator into my work. Comes on most charting services like Bloomberg. Basically it shows deviations from the moving average, when stocks get too far overbought or oversold. Naturally you buy when a stock or index gets oversold. For more on the CCI I suggest getting Oliver Perez’s Swing Trading Tactics DVD or Alexander Elder’s book TRADING FOR A LIVING. Over the last month of rally for instance certain stocks have far outperformed the averages. And numerous tradable asset classes or market sectors like the US dollar and oil have been both up and down offering trading profits but no net profits for buy & holders.

Otherwise than scalping profits what should we do? For now favor the long side and the cyclicals. I like technology, renewable energy and natural resources. Move up a notch in your market exposure to about 30% if you haven’t already but continue to hedge your bets and don’t get out on a limb by going too long. Just subdue your ego, don’t think you know more than Mr. Market does and just go with the flow, modestly. Bottom line take what the market gives you, right now there are some trading opportunities but don’t get carried away. There’s lots more trouble to come but the path ahead is likely to get more tricky as well. So don’t fall into the camp that says “fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.”

Have a good week!

Go Tiger Go!

Trading Ideas In A Bear Market

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:45:00 GMT

SECTOR VIEW. Biotech, Small Caps, US Treasuries and the US Dollar. Let’s comment on a couple market sectors and asset classes today. First, two stock market sectors which may prove profitable. Ha, you scoff! Profitable? In a bear market? Before you laugh, at least read my reasoning.

1. BIOTECH. The biotech sector was having a nice run up last year leading the stock market before trouble hit. From July 7th to August 14^th, the NASDAQ Biotech Index of 136 stocks jumped +16.2% as not many sectors were participating while the market, looking back, was building a top just before the October panic. Of course when worries about financial concerns, etc. got too heavy, the market, and the biotech sector, fell sharply until the November 21^st bottom. Since then biotech has regained +16%. What I’m saying is I’m seeing more relative strength in biotech than elsewhere. Even on down or mixed days I’m seeing the medical industry and the biotech niche hold up better than most. For example, just look at yesterday. Even after the reversal upward, not everything worked its way into positive territory by the close. Banks and financials ended lower, computers were up only slightly, utilities and large caps were only modestly higher yet the aforementioned NASDAQ Biotech Index gained +2.32% on the day. Plus I noticed a health care fund manager saying two days back on CNBC saying biotech is the particular niche of health care to be in going forward. Based largely on the fact that large pharma needs to restock its pipeline and that generally means takeovers of smaller companies like promising biotech concerns. Schwartz View: The large pharma companies have financial staying power so it’s likely they can build a fuller new drug pipeline by buying up biotech companies. Net, net I would use biotech as a core position in your modest long exposure, the allocation of both depending on whether we hold down here near the trading range’s bottom or not. Disclaimer! I hope modest long biotech positions in the sector rotation portfolios I manage but can and do change positions without notice.

2. SMALL CAPS. Then I’ve also noted some relative strength in small caps recently as well. In fact when I cut back my market exposure, increased some to participate in the last month and a half of modest rally, earlier this week, a little late, darn, I decided to keep my small cap sector fund and dump my large cap one. Then yesterday I see Mark Hulbert, who tracks stock market newsletters like this one, report the January Effect is underway. That’s when small caps outperform near the end of the year and in the beginning of the following new year. Generally works best when there are a lot of losses to take at the end of any calendar year, you know brokers work the phones to get investors to book losses for tax purposes. Anyway, Mr. Hulbert posits that this relative stronger showing by small caps shows investors are starting to embrace more risk. I don’t know about that but let’s hope he’s right. Myself, I’m looking at this relative strength as small caps NOT being exposed, or as exposed, to and hurt by the now strengthening US dollar and also that many small and mid cap companies hold far less debt than most large caps. Schwartz View: Still, Hulbert says this return to small caps outperforming now means investors can go back to analyzing individual companies again rather than worrying about total systemic risk. That would be a step forward if there are actually some winners and winning groups around once more instead of a sinking ship taking everything down with it. Note the online, vocational schools for working adults, like Apollo (symbol APOL) which jumped some +7.8% yesterday as a bit of proof that something’s working normally again. Disclaimer! As in biotech above, I hold small positions in some small and mid cap sector funds but can and do change quickly.

Ok, after two actual buy ideas for you in this Papa Bear market, not bad, let’s discuss briefly two asset classes which in today’s modern investing world, the individual investor can easily participate in through ETFs (exchange traded funds) and sector and inverse sector funds. One is just an update, the other a buy..

· US TREASURIES. Long term Wall Street economist, but not of the mainstream ilk, Dr. A. Gary Shilling just announced that “The 27-year rally in US Treasury bonds is over.” Wow! I know Gary has been 1000% correct on long dated US Treasury paper for a long time, for many years now, especially over the last year as the global “flight to safety” trade pushed long government bond yields lower and lower and lower. Gary long ago predicted rates would go below 3% eventually and they sure have. The plunged below 3% recently until bottoming, at least for now, on December 18^th at 2.074% for the benchmark 10-year Treasury and at 2.546% on the 30-year “long” US Treasury bond. But I don’t see Gary predicting a move up in yields, not yet. Schwartz View: That’s the key question. When to short long US Treasuries? Deciding whether yields will V-upward or go into a long L formation, remaining down here around a 3% yield. Myself, I’ve predicted that this Papa Bear market will include a ratcheting upward of long Treasury yields somewhere in say the second or third years (hopefully we don’t have a 3^rd year to this bear market!) So I’m just watching now and not betting on higher yields, not quite yet. Not with the Fed & Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke publicly saying that one next step for the Fed in getting credit flowing once again is for the Fed itself to become a buyer of government debt. Most feel he means shorter term US Treasuries, say up to 5 years in duration rather than longer term Treasuries but who knows for sure. So I wait and suggest patience, monitoring and waiting for just that right time to initiate a short ETF or inverse sector fund position inversing tracking long Treasuries. Jim Rogers, the renowned long term investor, is also licking his lips, getting ready to short US Treasuries as he’s stated more than once but I haven’t heard he pulled the trigger yet. Actually Rogers, like myself, previously shorted long Treasuries last year and then had to step in and cover at a small loss. Net, net for now we have to exhibit ultimate patience, desperately needed during any extended bear market like this one, and wait for our opportunity.

· THE US DOLLAR. The greenback has now been rallying since July 15^th so this long length of time, longer than the normal three month maximum time frame normally associated with intermediate term corrections up or down versus primary trends, likely means that a bull market in the buck is underway. But the jury is out right now on which way the primary direction if one just looks at the charts. The US dollar dropped sharply for three weeks in December and while it’s been working on regaining the large amount of ground lost then, it’s still not above its highs posted in late October. Schwartz View: My best gueestimate is that the buck does regain all lost ground and moves above its late November highs and continues on in a bull market. Again, “Mr. Correct,” Dr. Shilling, predicts the dollar will keep rallying this year. Why? Because he sees the stock market again dropping similar to last year, possibly losing another -35% or so. And thus the dollar is the best of a bad lot of global currencies, all trying to devalue to keep their economies moving, net, net meaning that there will remain a flight to safety in the dollar. Schwartz Recommendation: I don’t hold any long, or short, positions in the US dollar today but am considering putting one on as I see and agree with Gary’s logic and myself feel this big bad bear market isn’t going to be able to wind up in just one year. The breakdown being so severe needs time to heal. And if we do have another bad year in the stock market, the US dollar should hold up at least for the foreseeable future.

Principles of the Stock Market: Sample

Richard Schwartz — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:56:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Tuesday, January 6^th, 2009: OK, back to the rat race. The weather remains ugly. Yesterday am it was all ice. Tonight it seems like snow, then severe ice again tomorrow morning. This is the time of year I wish I lived in southern California or other warmer clime. Still, tiny New Paltz is a college, mountain town with open space, a walk around lifestyle so Lucy & I are there for the duration. Of course with beach vacations.

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. The latest gigundo $800 billion economic stimulus plan, now called the Obama Recovery Plan or some such, as he puts his fingerprints on it, may cause a bigger stock market rally than I previously thought, I realized last night as I watched the Nightly Business Report (before I got in the bathtub with reams of printed research to read). The Nightly Business Report (NBR) showed very wide differences in economic growth rates. Much stronger economic growth with the plan. Or rather much less economic weakness with next year showing positive Gross Domestic Product (GDP) with the plan and negative GDP without. Now I know the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) just said we’ve been in recession since December 2007, sort of bypassing the outdated GDP stat altogether but not every investor realizes this yet. CNBC and other financial media still take the easy way out, constantly stating a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative GDP, but as Peter Schiff writes in his latest book, THE LITTLE BOOK of BULL MOVES in BEAR MARKETS, most government stats are really skewed, biased toward what government wants to say, today. Also please remember, a stronger GDP really measures mostly spending … and overspending which is what we’re trying, what we need for the sake of America’s future, to get away from. More investing our money, not spending (blowing) it on unneeded gadgets, etc. But that’s a story for another day. Yes, what a mess!

THIS RALLY. Right now I can visualize stocks rising right into Senator Obama’s inauguration on January 20^th as the 44^th US president. (Obama as US president? Amazing!) Stocks rise as the plan comes into clearer focus, and as it becomes -- hopefully, cross fingers! -- a non-ideological, non-partisan bill. Hey, many Republicans should be very happy to come on board as surprise tax cuts are included and surprises also about the large size of the tax cuts, importantly including tax cuts and larger depreciation write offs for business! (We have to encourage, not discourage, business to invest, just the opposite of what FDR did during the 1930s.) Schwartz: Myself, I love what I’m seeing from our president-elect. Press conferences actually focused on improving America, not arguing among parties, open and honest talk and also a proposed web site so Americans can see where each of our dollars is going. “Go America Go!”

RALLY ENDS WHEN? Then maybe it’s all over, this bear market rally ends on inauguration day or shortly thereafter, say when the bill gets passed. But if those GDP interpretations I saw on NBR last night are reasonably correct ( it will take much time to discredit and change how we figure GDP to make it more relevant again) then maybe the US economy gets a sizable lift which lasts for some longer period of time before our still emerging problems pull us back down again. If that happens I can see a mini bull market or cyclical (short term) bull market unfolding this year, say starting back at the November 21^st intraday lows.

Schwartz View: Bottom line, my best recommendation this morning is that traders and many slightly longer term investors too get further reinvested back into the stock market. Not 100% for sure yet but higher exposure than in a long while. When? Say right now or very soon. Many key market indices and averages confirmed this new rally once again, on the first trading day of the year, last Friday. That’s the exact point – when we have a “Trader Vic” identified change-of-trend in place, we do, along with a higher low followed by a higher high, we do, and then we get another breakout move up and above that higher high (like occurred last Friday) – where correct strategy is to invest more.

ECONOMIC VIEW. Like I noted yesterday, I’m seeing more and more record statistical drops, like yesterday’s drop-off-the-cliff report from the auto industry; Chrysler leading the way down with a year over year drop of a mere 53%! My point is that just like the phenomenon in stocks when the economy drops fast it may also have a tendency to bounce back rapidly. I note some are now saying the same for oil, using history of something called the forward curve of futures prices. Of course this almost automatic, stock rally back likely doesn’t go all that far. Just like when a car crashes into a wall, bounces back, but still in drive, comes on again. Depends on how bad the crash was on how long the engine keeps running fueling the bounce back. Schwartz View: I have to think this financial crash of ours was extremely bad. Still I can see another big stimulus plan, if pointed at and framed correctly, using our brains and learning from past mistakes, doing a lot to produce some positive stats for a time after implementation.

TECHNICAL VIEW. Many Individual Stock Charts Looking Good! I drew up charts of almost all 100 companies on the latest IBD 100 weekly computerized list of leading stocks, stocks with good fundamentals and generally leading the market upward, yesterday afternoon. And I must say most now look good. A few of them are even already back above their highs set BEFORE the October panic sell off. That’s one of my parameters for possible buying as per my Principle of Relative Strength telling us what to buy. As to what other technical screens I used as I reviewed their charts on two charting services I get, Bloomberg, and for FREE on www.Marketwatch.com, I used RSI and DMI primarily. Briefly RSI stands for Relative Strength Index, it’s an oscillator, and measures market consensus psychology. While DMI stands for Directional Movement Indicator and is a trend-following indicator showing how fast a trend is moving and thus when a trend is worth jumping on board. Traders of all sorts should be familiar with both indicators I’d say. I would recommend Alexander Elder’s 1993 book TRADING FOR A LIVING as the best reference I’m aware of to bone up on these and other indicators.

Here’s a listing of a few companies and their underlying industry sectors which look ripe for trading this latest rally. Remember Investor’s Business Daily turned bullish, put the bull back in the box, back on December 3^rd and hasn’t been forced, by stocks hitting lower lows, to take it out since. This is a major difference for months prior to that. A bullish change. So let me post some stocks which look good to me.

Disclaimer! I own none of these stocks today but am considering buying a package of about three to five today or soon. Please remember my positions can and do change without notice.

IBD 100 STOCKS LOOKING TEMPTING

Market Industry

Price Cap Ranking Business

SXCI SXC Health Solutions 19.03 455m 2 Pharmacy Services

LPHI Life Partners 42.27 502m 3 Insurance Brokers

ESI ITT Educational 92.28 3570m 5 Schools

TWGP Tower Group 28.74 700m 8 Property/Casualty Insurance

HOME Home Federal Bancorp 10.65 184m 11 S&L/Thrifts-Western US

VSEC VSE Corp 42.34 215m 18 Engineering/R&D Services

SXE Stanley, Inc. 35.74 839m 18 Engineering/R&D Services

SYKE Sykes Enterprises 19.65 810m 18 Computer Services

AVAV Aerovironment Inc. 39.38 831m 23 Aerospace/Defense

TDG TransDigm Group 35.00 1703m 44 Aerospace/Defense

NPK National Presto Inds. 77.88 533m 63 Aerospace/Defense

NCIT NCI, Inc. 30.66 410m 70 Computers-Integrated Systems

SXL Sunoco Logistics 48.80 1398m 90 Energy Pipelines

CMP Compass Minerals 63.12 2046m 117 Quarrying

Schwartz View: It’s been some time since I posted stocks off IBD 100 weekly list. Because of this bear market. But this rally looks like it may just have some legs and my market philosophy is to play all decent looking rallies, modestly. I would thus suggest a three to five stock trading portfolio chosen from the stocks above. Some points to keep in mind. Don’t overdue it! We’re still in a bear market after all and one which looks to have more downside, even if it doesn’t come immediately. Also remember IBD recommends investors always focus on the top 40 or so industry groups. Finally, look for a quick +10% profit but cut your losses, individually or whole port6folio-wise, quickly. Remember we just might be starting some type of cyclical (short) bull market now but, on the other hand, the odds still favor much lower prices over time. So participate but always concentrate on your downside, how much you could lose.

Good trading! Have a great day!

Monday Weekly Strategy

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:37:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Eighteenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: RichardStk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, December 22^nd, 2008: So here it is, last letter ‘till Monday, January 5^th, as Lucy & I fly off to the white sand, warm blue waters of the Caribbean, maybe on a last hurrah (if the economy keeps sliding). I’m taking Cycles of American History & Rethinking the Great Depression books. Our routine is: Go to the beach, play backgammon, read & go out to dinner. Day after day. Warm our bones & work on new tans.

THE BIG PICTURE

Friday I saw John Bogle, who has been on Wall Street for 50 years and who created the first index fund, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund back in 1975, say investment bankers and bankers generally owe the country a huge apology (which I doubt we ever get). Their imprudent speculations and greed for massive fees from too complex speculations led to today’s financial sector problems, problems which have now fed out to the real economy hurting innocent, hard working, everyday Americans. Mr. Bogle says greed has even spread out to our whole economy, that we’ve morphed into in a “me first” society and it’s something we have to seriously take a look at. Thus capitalism, allowing markets to work unfettered of regulation and based on trust and trusting, has now been “deeply discredited.” Even the underpinnings of capitalism have changed radically. We’re no longer an ownership society whereby individual stockholders used to select and then hold 92% of all common shares; institutions 8%. Now institutions control 75% of shares through huge sums entrusted to them by others and have not invested prudently. Again, because of the incredible fees they got for investing. Mr. Bogle says they sure wouldn’t manage their own monies so recklessly. These institutions were supposed to be wiser than individuals but, again, it’s not their money. Supporting Mr. Bogle’s view is the revelation that 29 of the 30 largest losers in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme scandal were institutions whereby just one of these fund of fund companies was paid $160 million in 2007 alone for recommending the Madoff “hedge fund.” In other words, where was the fiduciary responsibility, the prudency, the probity expected when we entrust institutions to manage 75% of our investments? Schwartz View: Regular readers know I’ve been distressed and pounding the table about a number of these societal issues for years. About capitalism running amuck, culminating its 30-year trend toward widening the gap between it and its counterpart, democracy, with President Bush’s skewed one way Texas twang policy saying the be all and end all is that “bidness is bidness” and thus stifling regulation. And about society becoming so uncivilized, we ended up booing our own hometown, beloved sports teams! So while no one wants to live through what may come next in the economy, I have to say America has finally woken up, albeit after the nightmare it usually takes to precipitate major change, and that we are now started down a long and arduous path, but one finally pointed in the right direction again. As one example, we’ve even started to SAVE once again; amazing! So, for myself, I guess sort of a contrary indicator in recent years, I’m becoming more optimistic and bullish on our future. Finally! “Go America Go!”

THE ECONOMY

It became apparent that the US economy was suddenly falling-off-a-cliff right after Lehman Brothers became the one firm chosen NOT to be bailed out by the Federal Reserve and US Treasury Department. (Looked back upon as a colossal mistake in strategy I’ve read.) Lehman’s bankruptcy rippled out far and wide and led directly to losses in some money market funds, a “breaking of the buck,” and thus then to a total loss of confidence. Now, by all accounts, the economy is in total free fall. This sudden screeching halt in US business activity has caused the same in our global trading partners and most everywhere I look is now in corresponding economic free fall. You extrapolate it for yourselves from here. One view I’m pondering is that many times sharp declines lead to the second leg of a V-move, back up, and we’re overdue. Maybe stocks, with their recent unwillingness to keep going lower on bad news, means Mr. Market (the consensus of large investors) sees some end out there to the economic free fall. Still, we’d have to see some economic revival to expect a sustained V snapback in stocks. For now, I see 2009 providing a steady stream of bad news every time we look up. Just like in the second year of the last Papa Bear bear market, back in 1974, a continuing stream of bad news back then ultimately overwhelmed all attempts to rally until the final months of that year. Schwartz View: The consensus I’m hearing is that this sudden, fall-off-the-cliff global economic contraction is NOT going to lead to a repeat of the depression-spawned 1930s starting with its four-year long period of contraction followed by its anemic recovery, a.k.a. the Great Depression. I hate to follow any consensus especially when this one’s been so wrong for so long. But my own history look backs and studies by Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke, an expert on what went wrong in the 1930s, turning a recession into a depression, show that we raised taxes, cut spending and blocked global trade, just the wrong policies. So I sure don’t expect any exact repeat of those failed policies. Leading me to think out of the box and that maybe today’s Fed policy of battling a deflationary depression is also implementing incorrect strategy. How about worrying against runaway inflation spawning from all the money the US and now the world has and is still throwing at this economic slump? Just the problems we worried about in the early 1930s but didn’t occur. You know the old saying, people fight the wrong war, the old war, because that’s what’s still fresh in their minds. Thus, summing up, maybe we can’t expect much creativeness from the Fed pointing in the less obvious direction of battling inflation since they are entrusted with getting us through hard times. They will naturally, after learning certain lessons from the 1930s well, not break much new ground. One reason being that if their policies didn’t work, they would be heavily criticized for experimenting. Thus while everyone pooh-poohs an inflation problem, I still worry about one. Seems like the consensus, which may be correct, among the minority expecting and talking about an inflation problem, doesn’t expect one until 2010 at the earliest. Keeps me thinking about that quote I printed here back on Friday, December 5^th, from Sir John Templeton: “It’s impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.”

THE STOCK MARKET

Maybe we’ve started off on a new, lasting stock market rally as many now say. Maybe the November 20^th closing low and November 21^st intraday low did end this bear market or at least this phase of it and start us up and on a new mini bull market. But I don’t think we can determine that from these final days of stock market trading this year. This jig jag, saw-tooth modest rally we’ve had in December – the Dow remains down -2.8% this month, but up +13.6% from its closing low on November 20^th – still looks like just a time killer rally to me after stocks fell -6% in September, -14% in October and another -5% in November. So while I’m off on my annual winter beach vacation, I’m leaving my managed portfolios hedged with a slight long bias, still with my modest overall about 20% or less market exposure which I’ve carried since late last year. You remember late last year? At least as a lesson learned for the future, if for no other reason. After the stock market rallied back from its original car wreck in July, in what amounted to a head fake, false move, dead cat bounce and pretty obvious sucker’s rally, and a failed break out to new highs by the Dow and S&P (while the rest of the stock market refused to confirm).

Anyway, last week I ended the letter by noting that psychologically we should rally since bad news couldn’t drive prices down in recent days. Technically we had what could prove to be two months of base building everywhere I looked on the charts (but bases which could easily prove false). Fundamentally we even finally had low enough market valuations, like P/E ratios, to support a rally as well. But how about a catalyst? Well, let me offer up: (1) much lower gasoline prices which keeps our wallets and purses fuller and healthier, and (2) the good feelings anyone watching our president-elect making non-partisan, non-political, non-ideological selections for his cabinet, should feel. There may be a wellspring of good feeling, a sort of honeymoon psychological effect on investors, business, consumers and most all of us as we hope our new president can perform miracles. Schwartz View: Unfortunately no one man is going to remake America overnight. So, while keeping an open mind and watching all unfolding developments, for now I’ll back history which says this “worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” has to lead to an extended Papa Bear market, one which lasts at least a couple of years. Not just for one year, where we stand today.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

I hate to follow or even agree with some of what I’m hearing about going forward strategy, especially if such is espoused by those who were so wrong all this year. I’m speaking specifically about Bob Doll, now at BlackRock as their “Trillion Dollar” fund manager. I don’t want to pick on anyone but since he’s been leading the charge forward as stock markets collapse and getting all the face time doing such, I guess I have to. I start off very skeptical because my belief is that these big money managers are not going to get on TV and recommend anything before they and their clients get first crack at their thinking, ideas and recommendations and position themselves accordingly. I already wrote awhile back many old stock market books talk extensively about how big money always used to try to sucker the little investors. The age old technical Wall Street term “distribution” implied big guys needed little guys to unload their big positions on to when they foresaw a bear market ahead and thus put on a bullish face. It took much time to unload huge positions these large investors stockpiled so much frenzied excitement about the stock market had to be built up as big money sold. What better way today than Bob Doll coming on CNBC ubiquitously and always saying we are now in a bottoming process. He said that back in March and those who followed him are much the worst after the October panic crash. Anyway, that’s all secondary, although supporting, my main point. My main point is that Mr. Doll now says next year is going to be a good one for those taking on risk, not for those playing it safe. Again sounds good to me, at least at first blush. We all know what goes down the most generally can bounce tremendously when psychology changes. But do we really want to buy really risky investments in just the early part of the second year of a big, bad bear market? I say no. Bear markets of this size and scope historically have taken a lot longer than one year to work through.

Net, net, probably Mr. Doll will be proven correct about taking on risk, if one doesn’t factor in any time period. I’d guess risky asset classes will move fast when this bear market ultimately does end but do I really believe its going to end soon? No. And if we do have a 2009 mini bull market, say because stocks have fallen so much, then I’m not going to count on Bob and other institutional investors to tell me and us exactly when to get back out. No, starting off next year next week, I’d suggest still playing our cards close to the vest. Yes, play modestly for a continuing rally but look at it for now as just a bear market rally.

Happy Holidays & Happy New Year!

Richard

Potential Rally Remains on Tightrope

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:49:00 GMT

TECHNICAL VIEW. Written Friday, August 1st, 2008: 6:30 a.m. EST

With the S&P 500 closing just above it’s week ago Wednesday’s close this past Wednesday and the Nasdaq Composite following suit, we have a series of higher lows and higher highs in both, i.e., an uptrend in place. So I was hoping for some follow through by the Dow and other indices yesterday to confirm such. But no such luck. Turned out the market couldn’t overcome more depressing, recessionary-like economic data and even oil turning down didn’t help that much. Just wonder if Mr. Market has already reached the conclusion that lower oil won’t resolve all our problems. Nah, it’s hard to believe we’ve squeezed all the bullishness and resulting rally out of lower oil just yet. The crude price continuing to drop should continue to help stocks, just looked like a breather to me yesterday. Getting back to the technical view, and Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) putting the “Bull back in the Box” after a bullish “follow-through” day after Tuesday’s big up day on higher volume, IBD always recommends watching closely in the days immediately following. So I pulled out an dog-eared IBD publication because I remember well they have a good explanation of whether a follow-through day is succeeding or not. Yep, here it is, in William O’Neil and Gil Morales’ short 2005 book HOW TO MAKE MONEY SELLING STOCKS SHORT (get yourself a copy): “In a few instances, you may have a strong follow-through day and the market will still fail. When this occurs, it usually happens rather fast and can be figured out in a few days.” [Schwartz: This latest follow through day came very late, past the 4 to 10 day normal limit.] IBD follows with this: “If the market is making very little price progress on decreased volume, or if it abruptly begins to fail badly after a sharp, one-day rally, you are probably at another short selling point, as far as the general market averages are concerned.”

Schwartz View: I was prepared to push a little more money thru the windows yesterday – not too much! -- figuring a rally was started but didn’t when I remembered the first Friday of each month we get the JOBS report. Better to wait one more day. So let’s see what the 8:30 am data brings today (although I don’t trust the data, short term traders do trade it). FLASH! Data not too bad, if one trusts it. And while yesterday wasn’t any bearish “distribution day” because of the reduced trading volume, it still looks like we could get a market failure as IBD warns us to always watch closely for. And in spite of me possibly buying a bit more today, please remember, overall, I believe a recession is here & the market will have to factor that in & move lower over the next year or so.

Reasons For a Summer Rally

Richard Schwartz — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:22:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Written Wednesday, July 30th, 2008: 6:30 am EST.

Another ‘flashy-splashy’ rally yesterday So typical of bear markets, especially those with much further in time and points to go. Grizzly bear markets thrive on investors’ hope and adamant investor reluctance to believe things can get worse. Bear markets end when that hope is gone. Anyway, everyone jumped on board the stock market yesterday, figuring that, once again, the credit crunch is over or at least winding down. I doubt that and really doubt that the nine month bear market is over but one never knows the future for sure so we always have to keep an open mind.

A SCHWARTZ RECAP. Bulls, still fighting this bear market, did a great job of spinning (it’s always easier to spin when there is a germ of truth) that Merrill Lynch’s capital raising move yesterday and more billions in write offs showed we’re in the “end game” of this crisis. That Merrill selling some distressed assets, doing what no one has wanted to do, selling out and thus setting a low market price, about 20 cents on the dollar, for some of their CDO’s, means that everyone else may be forced to follow suit and thus that will call an end to the prevailing uncertainty. But this game doesn’t end with Merrill alone, this may just be the beginning of the end, which, as we all know, can go on seemingly interminably. And subprime write downs are now just one piece of the now larger and still spreading problem, although a big part I admit. And subprime sell offs at whatever price would have been better if done many months ago, following the old Wall Street rule which Wall Street, when pressed, totally disregarded: “The first loss is the best loss.” Not many are noting the awful details either, that Merrill is paying Temasek Holdings, a Singapore-owned SWF (no, not meaning Single White Female!), a sovereign wealth fund to buy more stock. Previously Temasek bought Merrill stock and lost a bundle. Thus in this deal Merrill is now paying Temasek a cool $2.5 billion to offset some of Temasek’s losses on that first buy. Plus Merrill is financing the deal for Temasek and this deal will increase and dilute Merrill’s outstanding shares by 36%. And, ironically, the sale of these CDO’s are at a price lower than Merrill’s just announced mark-to-market quarterly earnings report and stated value. Finally, this whole new deal flies in the face of what John Thain, Merrill’s relatively new boss, has said previously, that Mother Merrill wouldn’t need or be raising any new capital. Schwartz View: Net, net, some say Merrill is a goner, that it will have to be taken over down the road some. I don’t know any details but agree with the concept, that brokers will have to merge.

TECHNICAL VIEW. IBD PUTS THE BULL BACK IN THE BOX!

Yep, yesterday was a bullish “follow-through” day according to Investor’s Business Daily (IBD). On the 11^th day, pretty late, after the recent July 14^th bottom, a number of key market indices followed through yesterday, that is rallied more than +1.7% and on heavier trading volume than the day before. Obviously lower oil has been the underlying linchpin to this rally; oil down stocks up and vice versa. Schwartz View: My stated view is that this drop in oil will help stocks for a time, for the time it takes investors to realize that lower oil isn’t going to be the panacea for this bearish stock market. That at some point lower oil will scare the pants off investors (so to speak) because they will see lower oil as confirmation that a recession is here and spreading globally. But we’ll have to wait on this theory of mine as for now lower oil does means higher stock prices.

IBD goes on to remind us that: “Every bull market in Wall street history started with a follow-through. But not every follow-through launches a new bull market.” I believe their stats but also know IBD has put the bull back in the box and then had to take it out a few days or a week or so later a couple times during the last few months. So, remember, nothing, no particular indicator, is perfect, by any means.

More Reasons For a Rally. But I’ve also been writing that the market is oversold, that the US government has come up with a boat load of temporary fixes and props to support the stock market including the stimulus plan, unprecedented lending to non-banks and barring short selling or at least making it extremely difficult to short the financials (the SEC extended this one week ban to August 12^th yesterday). And that a historical study of the pace of declines during extended bear markets show the market is now ahead of itself on the downside. Plus I must say I am impressed by many European stock markets posting a sequence of five straight up days after an extended, inexorable, grinding-lower decline, i.e. a bullish Trader Vic 4-Day Rule and change of intermediate trend. So we could certainly have a summer rally now.

Schwartz View: Myself I’d like to see and have written that a Dow Industrials and S&P 500 close above last Wednesday’s highs would give us a series of higher highs and higher lows, the definition of an uptrend. Well, we didn’t get quite that high a close yesterday another good day or two could do it. As for “Trader Vic’s” as easy as 1-2-3 change of trend, we have condition #1, a broken downtrend line and condition #2, a market which has stopped going down in place. We don’t have, as of yet, condition #3, that’s the higher high I’m watching for. Still, Trader Vic Sperandeo in his two excellent books from the early 1990s, get them, writes we don’t need all three, we can turn bullish with just one or two conditions met. Just be more cautious in proceeding and realize there’s always the chance for a whipsaw and have a backup plan for what you’ll do if that happens, how fast you’ll backtrack. With those caveats in mind, I put on some longs yesterday, not a lot and not terribly risky ones. Basically my theme is that as crude and other commodities correct, pressure should come off the food companies, off their raw material and input and power costs. And that at the same time these pressures diminish, food companies are successfully pushing through price increases such as mentioned by Kraft yesterday. If this summer rally holds together, say we get a new higher high by the Dow and S&P, I’ll push the envelope for short term trading purposes further.

Monday Weekly Overview Sample Letter

Richard Schwartz — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:19:00 GMT

Richard Schwartz's

PRINCIPLES OF THE STOCK MARKET

A learning, teaching, always evolving stock market letter and advisory service

Seventeenth Consecutive Year of Publication; Letter #1; September 18^th, 1990

Post Office Box 1236 · New Paltz, New York 12561 - U.S. A. · (845) 255-6894

E-mail address: Richardstk@aol.com

Subscription · One-Year Morning E-Mail Delivery · $150.00

Monday, July 28^th, 2008: Your New Paltz, NY SUNFLOWER update: A few sunflowers have popped but I noticed the farmer’s market has alternated its plantings so any time you visit you should see some. Just spectacular!

THE BIG PICTURE

Looks like one potential US and global leader gets it. Presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama, to shore up his lack of experience on the global stage, embarked on a global tour last week. And was again able to put his finger on the pulse of the world and his audience, exhibiting his knowledge of history and this particular critical point in time speaking at the historic Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. While he didn’t rock star the crowd, fine with me, it was good to see he continues his role as alienate no one, moderator showing again he understands all sides of issues and is committed to leading by example. While not denigrating any political party, say our Republicans, or country, say Old Europe. Thus there is hope that America will soon embark on a new direction, one of getting things done by bringing all parties together and then making logical and effective, not ideological, decisions, forgoing our previous path of fostering divisiveness in the world, between our two political parties and among the American people ourselves.

Schwartz View: Enough said. I always get negative feedback when treading in political waters. I do like presumptive Republican presidential nominee and American hero John McCain quite a lot but just feel we have to drastically change policies going forward, not follow a similar path. America needs to get it’s act together quickly as all long range forecasters have reached consensus, saying we’re on a downward slide, financially, politically, economically, socially. We just need to start cohesively tackling our problems.

THE ECONOMY

Numerous economists last week admitted that the US economy is weakening. Among them Brian Bethune of Global Insight, James O’Sullivan at UBS and Moody’s John Lonski. So, in spite of the US not posting two straight quarters of negative GDP growth, the old and easy definition of a recession, and one not used any longer by the National Bureau of Economic Research which calls and dates recessions but problematically many months late -- remember in today’s new globalized world we need to learn new economic relationships! -- it looks like a recession is here. And in my view is going to stay with us for quite some time. That’s because America has been moneying-over all near term problems for many, many years, thus postponing the always needed recessionary cleansing and efficientizing of the US economy, while we’ve also avoiding developing and implementing solutions to our long term ills, like our increasing oil dependency, our underfunded government pension plans, Social Security and former Fed head Alan Greenspan’s #1 concern, Medicare. America does have a bad habit of avoiding problems until they reach crisis state. Maybe that’s because our representative democracy has become so dysfunctional here in the US. I would suggest we start fixing things right there in Washington by first getting rid of lobbying which skews everything toward those with the money to get their voices heard. Even corporate America, who now realizes it’s entrapped by this self-perpetuating system, would like nothing better than to see lobbying go away as big business now has to carry and fund a large and increasingly onerous lobbying budget.

Schwartz View: All I’ve read recently has been about how there are so many inefficiencies corrupting our inherently great economic and social framework that it’s a wonder anything can get done. Such as the US having 600,000 lawyers while Japan has 15,000 (those figures were about 10 years back but obviously haven’t changed for the better). And all the broken marriages and unwed mothers costing America a fortune as well. It’s almost funny, after encouraging the rest of the world to move to free markets for decades, when the Soviet Union collapsed and showed the economic rot hidden there, the world finally started followed our recommendations. And economic success followed suit but that led to tremendous and widespread global competition, so it’s vital we get our own act together as soon as possible, to just keep up. Thus the silver lining to this current economic slowdown, a slowdown that isn’t responding to our normal response of throwing money at it, is that crisis is when change really does occur in America

THE STOCK MARKET

Stocks have again gotten ahead of themselves on the downside although not as much out of whack as at the first bottom back in mid-March. Figuring the Dow Industrials and S&P 500’s previous bull market tops were set back last October, after nine months of a bear market or at the recent July 15^th lows, we are down on average about 2.5% per month versus the historic average bear market monthly decline of 2%. So we could easily see a backing and filling trading range here and now or even a modest rally, the two normal ways bear markets correct themselves. Much government intervention has come together to force down the price of oil and thus commodities in general, prop up housing and consumer spending, keep the financial system from breaking down completely and holding interest rates way below the rate of inflation. So all this government stimulus has to go somewhere just as previous stimulus found places to bubble up. Plus new government props and controls historically have been able to put a temporary fix in place.

Still, over a period of time the stock market reflects the economy and things aren’t really getting any better there, despite Q2 GDP growth out this Thursday going to again be positive. In point of fact, the economy is continuing to get worse if one looks under the surface at signals like credit spreads, a rough definition being the difference in yield between US government bonds and non-US government guaranteed bonds, which remain wide. Or if we factor in historic trends which show that economic downturns tend to surface hidden problems which end up feeding on themselves. Today’s continuing wide credit spreads mean at some point MBIA & Ambac and Fannie & Freddie, the other 17 big financials which have also been taken off the allowed short selling list & all the other financials who’ve lost billions of dollars aren’t going to be able to hide things any longer and are going to have to really own up. So stocks remain iffy for now. And with the rug pulled out from under the remaining stock leadership in the stock market over the last two weeks, out from under energy, the energy complex and other commodities, any market rallies are going to be just technically based, say from an oversold position or short sellers being forced to cover. Sure, a rally may then feed on itself and last longer than bears think, but should ultimately roll over as data worsens.

Schwartz View: Technically then, we could be embarking on a summer rally and if so sharp traders with the courage to risk their monies in the propped up financials may be able to scalp the stock market. And other pockets of strength should or may show up (hopefully in the health sector as that is now my focus with my few longs) normally searched out and propelled along by momentum players.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

LONG TERM PORTFOLIO STRATEGY continues to be hunkering down until this big storm passes. I expect that to be longer than most government and Wall Street economists and market strategists believe or at least publicly state. Publicly state because we all know that bearish Wal Street analysts and economists ultimately get fired and that in the aftermath of the dot.com bubble bursting, we got some theretofore hidden insight into what analysts really think. I see widely-followed, economist Nouriel Roubini, formerly holding various high level economic advisory positions in government, believes the US and European economies are now sinking as last Friday he said Wall Street was in spin mode and that financial institutions are “… manipulating at will their earnings, and analysts [are] falling for this supreme baloney.”

NEAR TERM PORTFOLIO STRATEGY depends more on whether this two-week, fledgling rally proves it has legs or not. I’m using as a key gauge whether the Dow and S&P are able to close above their last Wednesday’s closing highs, Dow 11,632.40 and S&P 1282.19. If these key indices close higher, then we will have the definition of a new up trend in place, a series of higher lows and higher highs. Strategy then will be to favor the long side but with say with no more than 50% at most market exposure. Planning on a modest summer rally for a month or two, with strategy being trying to scalp some short term profits.

AS FOR INCOME INVESTORS, we’ve all gotten used to our income fixes after 25 years of income investing being easy during a bull market in bonds, meaning just riding the trend toward lower and lower long term rates, I know it’s a struggle for you all today. My best suggestion is to watch for weakness in income sectors, say in utilities, royalty trusts and even REITs, then strike. Only move in and in a small manner AFTER a sector has just been blasted. This gives you some profit buffer as primary extended downtrends many times have sharp sell offs after disillusioned investors finally give up hope and sell, right before they rally. This can get you in at unusually good prices, at least for the near and intermediate term.

INCOME IDEAS. Thus I would currently search through the utility sector as the Dow Utility Index has just fallen a sharp -8% over the last two weeks. Or take another look at my previous July 11^th, 2008 two energy income recommendation Cross Timber Royalty Trust (CRT) and San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (SJT), both haven tumbled hard with crude. Both go ex-dividend tomorrow, meaning today’s the last day to get in to collect the substantial August dividend (both pay monthly). Or finally, revisit my other income recommendation, back on July 10^th, 2008, of two large European pharmas, GlaxoSmithKline PLC (GSK) AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) paying moderate dividend yields of 4.4% and 5.8% respectively. You need to buy GSK today to be entitled to this quarter’s dividend and buy AZN soon before it goes ex-dividend (not declared yet but last year it went ex on August 8^th). Good income investing!

Have a great week!

Get Back Into Gold!

Richard Schwartz — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:19:00 GMT

GOLD VIEW. It’s Time to Buy Back into GOLD! I must say the gold chart looks ripe for a rally and the background economics are screaming rising inflation here in the US and all around the globe, so I would recommend buying back into gold. Gold pulled back from its big Round Number of $1000 in almost perfect fashion for those of us like myself who believe Round Numbers are meaningful & insightful. If you remember gold traded over $1000 an ounce for just two days, on Friday, March 14^th and again on Monday, March 17^th, found that it didn’t have enough buyers to propel it higher and promptly rolled over, sold off and said sayonara to $1000. So it’s been down for the normal three weeks to three months which normally encompasses counterswing rallies to primary down trends . Since then it’s bottomed at $852.70, then at $864.00 and then $877.90. So it’s made a series of higher lows which is bullish. And, as I mentioned earlier, all I see is rising inflation around the world, from here in the US to Europe to Asia to the developing world to the new “frontier” world. Sensible because food and energy are soaring everywhere.

Schwartz View: Since gold reversed direction around the “fateful weekend” when the Fed showed they were backstopping the whole financial system, it just makes sense that if the stock market rally which began around that same time is over or in its last throes, the other counterswings that began the same time may be over as well. One such counterswing has been in gold. So, I recommend buying gold today.

Like always let me recommend buying the gold bullion tracking stock, now called SPDR Gold Trust (symbol GLD) instead of the gold mining companies. Buying GLD takes the added, now unnecessary risk of buying the gold miners themselves out of the mix. Regular readers know I want to take that geopolitical risk out. The recent risk that developing countries all want to renegotiate their contracts with all the mining companies including the gold miners. (And who can blame them?) They want better deals than which they made back when gold was at $250 an ounce. Renegotiating would hurt gold mining profits, so in spite of us having the right investment idea we could lose; you know being in church but in the wrong pew.

Bottom line, I have to think with global wide inflation rearing its head for the first time in some 25 years, gold will surely benefit over the longer run. And since we just pulled back, it’s a good time to get back in. Thus I would buy a little gold here and buy more on weakness, paying close attention to the correct percentage exposure for your own circumstances and also how much you buy each time in. Overall through your gold exposure starting today should be much larger than the normal 3% to 5% exposure that many advisors normally and historically recommend. It’s gold’s time to shine again after being out of favor for 25 or so years. Be sure to get some as it should prove a great hedge against your long portfolio.

Disclaimer! I own a little GLD and plan to buy more although please remember I can switch my views and thus my positions at any time.

Oil Near a Peak? Yes.

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 29 May 2008 18:56:00 GMT

OIL VIEW. I’ve been reading a lot about oil, the current state and the history of oil as we see prices keep rising and we all wonder where a top is. So below are some interesting tidbits which I’ve unearthed from the Internet (a great modern day development!) for you to ponder, some obvious, some insightful (I hope):

· OPEC has used oil as a weapon against western countries in the past. Schwartz View: A bad precedent. The October 1973 embargo effectively raised prices quickly and sharply to a new plateau (from $3 a barrel in 1972 to $12 a barrel) which lasted for the rest of the 1970s.

· The Iran revolution (getting rid of the Shah) in 1978 and the following war between Iraq and Iran in September 1980 again raised the price of oil quickly, doubling oil prices from $14 to $35 a barrel by 1981. Schwartz View: So both times oil rose sharply in price and stayed there.

· Oil is notoriously price inelastic according to some researchers. Another reports says: “The supply and demand for oil are both inelastic in the short run …” Which is what commodity guru Jim Rogers sees, that it takes many years for oil supplies to increase when demand increases which is his basis for the whole commodity complex to keep rising. Schwartz View: I’ve been waiting a year or so now for “higher prices to resolve higher prices.” Now I understand this is a too simplistic argument and why it hasn’t happened that way just yet. Another reason is because we are much less dependent on oil today. “Energy costs;’ share of GDP has fallen from 8% in 1973 to 2% today.” (From an Internet article written in 2005).

· Over time though, the supply and demand for oil is more elastic. Schwartz View: Thus the past history of oil prices rising sharply, then slowly sliding lower over time as more supply comes on board. Probably the price pattern we’ll follow again although we’ve likely raised the base price level or floor such as transpired in the past.

· Commodity (and China) guru Jim Rogers says his research shows commodity bull markets last roughly 17 years. Schwartz View: I see the price of oil slid from 1981 to November 1998 when it bottomed out about $13 a barrel. Just about when Rogers called a new commodity bull market.

· From the last bear market bottom in oil in 1998, we’ve had the first bull market leg up from the bottom in November 1998 to June 2000 as oil rose from $11 to $35 a barrel. Then after a price correction downward and a breather, we put in a 2^nd bull leg up from November 2001 at $20 to a peak around Hurricane Katrina at about $75. After that blow off peak, prices fell for five months coming back to $50. Since it’s been straight up in a third bull market leg. Schwartz View: Since we’ve now put in the normal three legs up which compose a full bull market we could easily be due for a sharp and severe pullback in oil.. Especially so since I see a guest on CNBC talking up $200 oil, bullish predictions being a normal sign of bulls getting carried away just before a top.

· The US placed price controls on domestically produced oil during the first energy shock in the early 1970s. This caused US consumers to pay less for gasoline than they otherwise would have. Longer term, price controls kept America from reducing our oil consumption in the middle 1970s and thus our dependence on foreign oil producers. Thus when the 2^nd oil shock hit in the late 1970s we were much more negatively impacted by prices jumping sharply. Schwartz View: This is why I advocate keeping oil prices high now, let America take the pain now, so money keeps flowing into developing alternate energy sources. Let’s not repeat the mistakes of the 1970s!

· History shows higher oil prices in the early 1970s, the late 1970s and then in 1990 after Iraq invaded Kuwait all led to recessions. Schwartz View: Maybe it will be different this time around but we all know predicting “this time it’s different” usually proves disastrously wrong.

· Here’s the rationale behind higher oil prices leading to recession: “Higher oil prices have historically led to recessions because they act as a tax on spending by absorbing consumer dollars that would be spent elsewhere, by reducing corporate profits through increased costs and lower demand, and by causing higher inflation which in turn causes higher interest rates.” Schwartz View: All of which seem to be developing today except, so far, higher interest rates because the Fed has been lowering shot term rates to free up the frozen-up financial system. These lower rates which ultimately should lead to even higher inflation.

· The 1970s were characterized by “stagflation” after sharply higher oil prices raised inflation levels while simultaneously reducing economic growth. Schwartz View: Isn’t the same economic ripple effect happening right now? I’d say yes.

· The 10-year US Treasury bond yield rose from 6% to 15% during the oil shocks in the early and late 1970s. Schwartz View: This time the 10-year, benchmark Treasury bond yield has stayed low because of the credit crunch and the “flight to safety” trade by investors. Doesn’t it seem logical that when the Fed stops lowering rates and/or says the credit markets are back to normal, long term interest rates will once again rise? Does to me. In fact, higher long term rates may be happening now. That’s one big reason why I’m not recommending bonds and haven’t been.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. Actually I could go on and on researching and commenting on oil. And I’m interested in continuing my research so I may add a few more comments/insights in coming days. But for now the history & current spike higher in oil makes me predict that soon we’ll see some type of peak in oil very soon!

Top of Bear Market Rally? Protect Yourselves!

Richard Schwartz — Wed, 28 May 2008 15:15:00 GMT

Written Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

THE STOCK MARKET

Briefly, the stock market pulled back sharply last week. Obviously this pullback may be about over and may be just a normal “shake out” on the way to higher prices. While that could be true, it usually is during bull markets, another alternative is it also could be the top of a bear market rally. And selling near the tops of any/all rallies has always a good thing in the past, right? So I would listen to the market -- it does communicate with investors who monitor it closely enough – and bow down to its judgment. Today, that means protecting ourselves. And if this doesn’t prove to be any big top, just a shake out, short and intermediate term players can jump back in. Remember my first guesstimate was we were just running out of buying power and thus could fall back to where this last run up began, about Dow 12,325, S&P 1330, Nasdaq 2275 and the mid April lows in the other indices. Now, though, after watching all the bad technicals show up last week and some reemerging economic worries, like more inflation and less growth, I’d say the odds have risen that we’ve just seen an important bear market rally top. Schwartz View: Bottom line, it’s much more important today to protect our portfolios than continue to take on unnecessary risk right when we could be headed into a second and possibly even worse leg down than we’ve just been through. If we do go down and break to lower lows, there won’t be any disagreement left that we’re just in a normal bull market correction. And that could feed on itself and lead to a more extended market decline. We don’t want to be complacently caught up in the early days of that move down. So better to be safe than sorry. Maybe we’re going to miss a market “melt up” such as the most bullish advisors think is ahead but even most of the bulls feel it’s going to be a tough slug ahead. So let’s protect ourselves here.

PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

The always-to-be-expected bounce back rally after the July/October declines to the March lows may be over. The technicals pronounced such last week. Four day or more sequences, distribution days, poor breadth, narrowed-down leadership and weak trading volume all said the two-month rally is kaput. Investor complacency, built after the Fed backstopped Bear Stearns and thus implicitly, the whole financial system, just adds to the likelihood that this decline may be a resumption of the big bad bear market. Thus my recommendation last week which read: ‘We’ve played this “sigh of relief” market bounce since the mid-March lows back up. But now’s the time to cut back exposure to about where we stood back at the lows, to again hunker down to the point where we can ride out any retreat back to test those lows or even go lower.’

Schwartz View: I’ll stick with that market advice kicking off a new week. If you increased your stock market exposure back near the January lows and then maybe again near the March lower lows, which I suggested, and thus made yourself some paper profits since, cut back now, get rid of that extra exposure, and lock in those profits now. I followed my own advice last week and now have added some bets on the market dropping again, going back into inverse funds. I want to be back in my hunkered-down position going into summer. FYI, I’m still nervous about what July will bring since about six months earlier, in January this year, stocks fell so sharply. Mr. Market discounts about six months in advance. And July’s can be awful as I remember back on vacation in Hawaii in July of 2002 seeing the stock market open down and sink lower day after day after day.

Technicals Suggest, Not Guarantee, Rally Is Over.

Richard Schwartz — Fri, 23 May 2008 14:36:00 GMT

UPDATE ON THE STOCK MARKET. Written Friday, May 23rd, 2008: 6:30 a.m.

Stocks normally bounce after two or three days of sharp declines. And the size and cope of a bounce is telling. So yesterday’s “bounce” proved disappointing. For perspective, take the Dow Industrials. The Dow rose +24 points or +0.19% yesterday on trading volume of only 216 million shares. This after losing -200 points on Tuesday on volume of 265 million shares and another -227 points Wednesday on 266 million shares. That’s a total loss -427 points or -3.2% over the previous two days before yesterday’s small bounce and as you can note, the two down days came on higher trading volume than yesterday’s up day. All in all, a negative trend and pattern and not much of a bounce either. Maybe today will show some further bounce but we’re certainly not being helped by global trading as ASIA was mostly down and EUROPE is down everywhere I look going into our market opening here. Maybe we’ll rally next Tuesday, the first day of trading after the long Memorial Day weekend, as the Hirsch’s STOCK TRADER’S ALMANAC says normally proves to be the case. ‘Course most days after Memorial Day are usually buttressed by strength at the start of a new month as well, but this year there’s three more days of trading in May after Memorial Day so that’s an X-factor. Schwartz View: Whatever, the , big question is whether this two-month rally in the market after the sharp declines of the previous five to eight months in the various averages is over. Or not. No one knows for sure. All we can do as speculators and traders is to is play the odds and go with the flow. We have some technical signs that the rally has ended, like the fact that key indices such as the Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq Composite and S&P Smallcap all failed to hurdle their long term or 200-day moving averages when they ran up against them kicking off this week. These long term or about seven month long trendlines are now pointing down, another negative as many professional investors use these lines and their direction, up or down, as key guidelines to the longer term trend. Also, as I started pointing out on Tuesday, we had four straight days or more sequences up in many of these same indices, many times according to “Trader Vic” Sperandeo, an indicator that the last buying power is being sucked out of the uptrend. Followed by a sequence of four straight days down by the Nasdaq Composite and the S&P Smallcap, an offshoot of the same reversal-of-trend indicator which has proven pretty reliable (not perfect) since I’ve been tracking it over the last couple of years. Add in numerous bearish “distribution days” as tracked by Investor’s Business Daily (IBD). IBD turned bearish yesterday, pointing out that trading volume has been low on this rally while breadth has been weak, both signs of a dead cat bounce rather than anything sustainable. All in all, I suggested cutting back the additional exposure shorter term players put on near the March bottom and followed my own advice. Now let’s sit back and wait a few days to see if this rally is over or just shaking some of us out.

Both Trader Vic 4-Day Rules In Play

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 22 May 2008 14:15:00 GMT

Technically, the market looks out of steam. Whether this latest two day fall back is the end of the bear market rally or just a normal “shake out” of weak holders on the way higher is open. Remember I thought the market had exhausted itself back two weeks ago when I saw Rising Wedges in a few indices. That would have meant a temporary fall back to prices prevailing where and when the wedges began forming, about April 14^th. Then, confounding me, stocks took off upward once more, numerous indices posting four day or more straight sequences upward, kicking in “Trader Vic’s” (Sperandeo; get his two great 1990s books on www.Amazon.com or elsewhere) very helpful 4-Day Rule or more accurately his 4-Day Corollary Rule. The corollary rule states that “…after a long move of intermediate proportions,” when a trend goes up four straight days or longer in the same direction as the trend, the first day down indicates a trend change. Well, right after that up sequence happened in the S&P 400 Midcap and numerous other indices, stocks turned tail and some indices have now fallen for four straight days. This additional four day sequence, this time downward, is Vic’s 4-Day Rule. Which just essentially says the same thing, that the odds of a trend change are high. Schwartz View: Makes sense to me, four or more days up followed by four days down (in the S&P Smallcap, Nasdaq Composite and Nasdaq 100). Whew! A head spinner, that’s for sure. Net, net, I would just heed the market’s communication and cut back some.

1973-1974 Redux

Richard Schwartz — Thu, 22 May 2008 14:09:00 GMT

The Principle of History. Knowing one’s history gives us guidelines and a basis to work from. So yesterday I began to compare the last Papa Bear market we lived through, 1973-1974, which encompassed the first really oil crisis, to today’s ongoing bear market and oil shock. I said I was printing research off the (wonderful!) Internet & get back to you. Well, I’m baaack.

1973-1974 OIL CRISIS COMPARED TO TODAY

Studying the 1972 through 1974 period in more depth yesterday, please let me note that:

There were three separate legs down in the two-year Papa Bear bear market of 1973-1974:
The first leg down was sharp and came in January 1973. From a peak on January 11^th, 1973, the Dow fell -10% over the next 30 trading days. Then kept sawtoothing lower until late August when it completed a seven-month loss of over -18%. This first leg down can be compared to what the Dow has recently gone through, since its peak on October 9^th last year. From Dow 14,164.50 to the Dow low of 11,740.20 the Dow lost -17.12%. Schwartz View: So about comparable in time, seven months versus five months, and extent, -19% to -17% to the first leg down in the Papa Bear market of 1973-1974.
The stock market in 1973 then rallied +15% from its lows over the following two months. That brought us back to within about -6% of its old January 1973 high and peak. Schwartz View: This time around the Dow has rallied +11% from the March 10^th lows to the May 2^nd highs, so for just under two months. And has brought the Dow within -7.8% of its old highs. So a weaker, shorter rally, which may be bad, IF it’s indeed over.
Going forward from that bear market ally high in August 1973, the two-month rally where some investors “were likely lulled into believing that a new leg up was occurring” the market began its second leg down, which brings us up to date and to today.
Looking back again to what happened in 1973, and projecting forward to what unfolds today, the 1973 second leg down began in August and ran until December and the Dow dropped an additional and even more severe -20%. The leadership of that era, the “Nifty Fifty,” resolved its previous divergence, holding up while the smaller cap stocks got hurt during the first leg down, and caught up on the downside as shown by the -20% Dow drop. This drop took roughly three to four months. Schwartz View: Thus I have to project a second and more severe leg down starting now or soon. Probably including the remaining leading energy and commodity sector taking a hit.

Other similarities and/or dissimilarities from the oil shock and crisis back in 1973-1974 to today’s oil shock which I unearthed in my research yesterday are:

1. Rising inflation was a big issue in both periods.

2. The Vietnam War ended during that past bear market, something similar to what I expect to happen during this bear, us getting out of Iraq.

3. The US dollar was under pressure back then even in the early stages of the bear market, in February 1973, it was devalued by 10%. It’s losing value again, now.

4. Oil jumped from $3 a barrel to $5.11 a barrel, beginning with the October 1973 OPEC oil embargo, a quick jump of 70%. We all know oil has soared the last couple of years as well.

5. We had massive layoffs of 142,000 in the auto industry in 1974; yesterday American Airlines announced “large layoffs” ahead.

6. We had Franklin National Bank be declared insolvent in 1974; this year Bear Stearns effectively was declared insolvent by the Fed. Other banks, investment and money center remain under great pressure.

7. BARRON’s Roundtable was unanimously bullish starting off 1973; same thing from Barron’s Roundtable kicking off last year.

8. The US economy from 1972 to 1974 dropped from a growth rate of +7.2% to -2.1%. And the UK economy dropped from +5.1% to -1.1%. This time around both the US and UK economies are also dropping quickly.

9. Stocks priced in gold were priced very low back then. Same low valuation in terms of gold today with gold at 900$+.

10. We had a new Fed chairman, Arthur Burns, arrive in 1970, who encouraged inflation. We have a new Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, who is also encouraging inflation today.

SCHWARTZ SUMMING UP. No use looking out too far, looking at the third leg down in 1974 for instance, which came after another always-to-be-expected stock market rally and multi-month trading range. Let’s hope this time around isn’t so bad although I must say things do look pretty bad to me.