The Room : Economy

The Room – 07/10/2009

David Galland — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:59:00 GMT

Dear Reader,

In the June edition of The Casey Report, and again in the edition that was put to bed July 2, we warned that the U.S. equities markets were on the edge of the next leg down in the slow-motion crisis now unfolding. (You can read both issues... more here).

While there is no such thing as a sure thing, the idea that the worst could be behind the economy is almost unimaginable, given the deep structural flaws and governments doing what Doug Casey correctly calls the "exact opposite" of what they should be doing.

Namely trying to solve a debt crisis by adding more debt.

Of course, as turmoil returns to the broader stock market, investors will again scramble for "safe harbor" investments, and that spells trouble for commodities and commodity-related equities, which are viewed by many as "recovery" investments.

While it often marches to its own drummer, in June and again in July, we warned that gold, too, will be affected, though more moderately so. Looking over the price charts since June for gold and oil – among other commodities – it seems clear the correction has begun.

Even so, for the record, we see any setback to the "tangible" sector as being relatively short lived. That's because commodities are the actual stuff of life – unlike, say, flat-screen televisions, which you can hold off buying indefinitely. Food for the table, on the other hand...

As prices fall, commodity producers, long accustomed to dealing with price volatility, will reduce output to rebalance the supply/demand equation and stabilize prices at a profitable level. Of course, there are circumstances under which a producer will continue to produce, even with prices below production costs – say, to avoid the cost of shutting down and eventually restarting a mine or a well. Though not for long.

clicking here

But for many commodities today, structural issues already make any further reduction in production a quick ticket to shortages and soaring prices: copper, gasoline, sugar, cotton, and hogs, to name just a few.

Casey's Trend Trader

More about the Trend Trader here

Regardless, we see the potential for a return to a period of increased volatility in pretty much all things – including some of our favorite investments – but soon thereafter, opportunity will present itself at our collective doors.

Opportunity Knocks

Using history as our guide, after running for shelter as the next leg down in the economy unfolds, most investors will then cower there until the experts on CNBC (the same ones that completely missed this crisis in the first place) tell them it's safe to get back in the water.

Of course no one can be blamed for being extra cautious just now, and we urge you to follow the herd on that point. However, we would also urge you to remember that the herd is almost always slow to react... in getting out of fragile markets, and especially in getting back in.

At the same time that the level of risk is rising, there is a big, fat opportunity brewing as well. If you are attentive and willing to take actions that run contrary to the herd.

The source of this opportunity comes from the government's highly predictable reaction to the next wave of bad news. That reaction becomes obvious (at least to us) by asking the rhetorical question, "Confronted with steadily worsening unemployment, collapsing real estate prices, bankrupt state governments, skyrocketing bank failures, what do you think they are going to do?"

Cutting back on the spending? Letting the free market run an unfettered course? Not likely.

Instead, the president will ask the public for more patience, as his administration mans the spending pumps even more aggressively. The straws confirming that view are already in the wind; on July 7, one of President Obama's top advisors called for yet another round of stimulus.

Sure, they'll have to be increasingly clever to avoid an even stronger political backlash, but the squeeze they are now in (and, for the record, not all of it was this administration's doing) is getting tighter by the day. They have painted themselves into a corner.

And so, to use an old poker term, they are reaching the point where they'll feel they have no choice but to either fold or go "all in." You know, shoving all their chips onto the table (actually, they're your chips they are playing with, but hey...).

Given the unacceptable political consequences of folding their hand (i.e., doing nothing) and the simple truth that monetary inflation has been the default mode for handling economic downturns for many decades now, we have little doubt the government will take the "all in" approach, a desperate measure designed to buy time (at least through the next election).

And that sets up the opportunity.

Playing the Bounce

There has already been a sea change in awareness among the trading community about the seeds for monetary damage sown over the last year. And with this awareness comes increased sensitivity to further debasement of the dollar. Thus, each new announcement of stimulus lately has triggered a quicker rebound in gold and other commodities – as well as the resource-related stocks.

To be as succinct as possible, a struggle for me at all times, in the same way that we anticipated the resource sector correcting along with the broader markets, we also anticipate it to bounce back much quicker. Supporting that contention, consider the last three 25%+ corrections in the S&P versus the GDX, a gold stock ETF.

From Sep 19 to Oct 27, 2008, the S&P dropped 32%, but the GDX fell 57%. Deflation was then the watchword of the day.
From Nov 4 to Nov 20, 2008, the S&P lost 25% while the GDX fell slightly less, by a 23%. Is it really deflation we fear, the traders asked, or might this whole doubling-of-the-money-supply thing be signaling inflation?
It was during the slide in the S&P that occurred between January 1 and March 2009 that the changing tide in inflationary expectations became pronounced. During that correction, the S&P 500 lost 26%, but the GDX lost only 14% in the first two weeks of January – then roared back 33% by February 17, while the S&P continued to fall.

Subsequently, as the S&P rallied 36% between its bottom on March 9 and July 1 due to the (false) sightings of green shoots, the resource stocks added to their head start, rallying 50%.

In other words, natural resource investors who can keep their heads about them will be able to win in both scenarios: the one where the economy is falling and the government is stimulating (a certainty on both fronts), and the one where the economy begins to recover – or the masses come to believe it is.

The only scenario, in fact, that will disadvantage natural resources is if the government adopts a posture of steely-eyed free marketers that step aside and let the worst come to pass. We would contend that to be highly improbable.

Thus, the way to play things just now, as we see it, is to be cautious, but with the full expectation of aggressively buying up resource bargains before the crowds venture back out of their safe harbors. It might take a month or two (or maybe three), but it's unlikely to be much longer than that.

Investments can be made in certain physical commodities (gold and silver bullion), leveraged commodities positions (using strategic combinations of options and futures), or in selected resource equities, especially those of deeply undervalued and well-positioned companies in the precious metals and energy sectors.

In fact, the biggest challenge you'll face will be choosing between all the many opportunities we see materializing just over the horizon. But if you begin planning now, you should be ready to act when the time for action arrives.

Of course, all of the Casey Research specialty publications will make it a point to help you prepare for the next leg up in our favorite sectors. Of these, the services most dedicated to elephant hunting – namely bagging the really big returns – are Casey's International Speculator and, for especially active investors, our premium Casey's Investment Alert.]

Speaking of Unemployment

As you can see from the chart here, compliments of the monthly Data Farm feature in The Casey Report, the trend in unemployment remains solidly intact. Unemployment is now reaching a point so dire that soon it won't be reported on as further evidence of the economic slump but rather as a driving force (among many) in the ongoing collapse.

As recently as January, the government predicted that, thanks to the stimulus, the unemployment rate would top out at 8%. Despite energetic attempts to conceal the actual numbers, the official rate has still shot up to 9.5%... but the actual number is running closer to a depression-era level of 16%.

Ed. Note:

Worsening unemployment is one of those "important" things people should be paying close attention to. That's because the duration of the crisis – and sadly, the government's many exertions will result in it going on for much, much longer – means that the clock on receiving regular unemployment benefits is running out for more and more of the unemployed.

And, other than rely on the kindness of family members and friends, once the unemployment benefits dry up, what is a person to do? Well, for starters, sign up for special extended unemployment programs. Those programs are seeing a large increase in recipients. Quoting the Washington Times on the topic...

"... there were major jumps in two federal jobless programs. Workers collecting payments from the extended-benefits program increased by 65,000 to 347,000 for the week ending June 20. States also reported that 2.52 million persons were collecting Emergency Unemployment Compensation benefits, reflecting an increase of 81,000.
And this from Bloomberg...

average duration

benefits

This is a trend in motion that will stay in motion and worsen. Which means that the cost of maintaining the social safety net will only grow with each passing day. And, of course, unemployed people, no matter how willing, eventually run out of savings and have to let their debt payments – credit cards, auto loans, home equity, mortgages, etc., etc. – fall by the wayside.

In addition to exacerbating the economic downturn and, by extension, deficits, persistent and growing unemployment will soon lead to social pressure as desperate people begin to do desperate things. Riots in the streets are not out of the question.

And confronted with desperate people doing desperate things, the government will again react predictably – ginning up yet more and larger quantities of bread and circuses.

From where I sit, anything other than letting the situation self-correct in a quick and brutal crash so we can get this over and done with will result in a protracted, torturous death spiral, a negative feedback loop that will last longer than any of us can imagine.

You know what I hope? I hope I'm wrong.

Wicked Game

you can listen to it here

What Really Makes the World Go Round
(and How to Profit from It)

Understandably, people tend to think about energy in terms of the cost of gasoline at the pump or the electricity bills they get each month.

But energy is much more than that. It's the very juice that allowed humankind to graduate beyond being just another dumb animal. Without exaggeration, it's the critical component in most human endeavors, touching everyone and virtually everything that makes up the modern life.

Further, a solid case can be made that each discovery of new and more efficient energy sources coincides with humankinds most stunning advances: in food production, population growth, health, transportation, technology.

Case in point, consider that the rise of nearly unlimited oil and natural gas as mass energy sources began in earnest in the 1860s (unseating whale oil, which was quite limited). At that time the U.S. Civil War (1861-1865) was fought by men on horseback with swords and muzzle-loaded firearms.

Almost impossibly, just 80 years later Paul Tibbets dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima. And just 100 years after Lee surrendered his sword at Appomattox, man set foot on the moon.

Simply, the story of energy is step-by-step the story of the ascent of humankind.

I mention this as a circuitous route to make the point that the constant quest to maximize existing energy sources, and to find new ones, is a quest that will never end... at least not until the ultimate breakthrough occurs that allows us to, for example, efficiently harness energy from the sun.

But that is then, and this is now. And right now the energy sector is huge, diverse, and geographically fragmented.

And because of its day in, day out importance, it is also extremely rich in opportunities for investors armed with the right information.

On that front, by now you should have received an invitation to our first ever Casey Research Energy & Special Situations Summit, which is being held in Denver, September 18 to 20.

The registration site for the event, which already boasts one of our most impressive faculty line-ups yet, is now open. Access our summit site by clicking here.

At the event, you'll get concise briefings on specific opportunities in everything from green energy to lithium technology, and from conventional oil and gas in North America, to unconventional oil and gas in Europe. Coal, uranium, geothermal, hydropower, solar, and much, much more will be covered (and, where appropriate, debunked) and the very best opportunities to get positioned for energy profits revealed.

As for the "special situations" in the summit's title, that refers to first-ever programs on emerging homerun opportunities in areas such as rare elements.

All signs are that it will be one of our best – and maybe even our best – summits ever.

As always, it will be a great opportunity for you to meet members of the Casey Research team and to share notes with like-minded individuals. If you've ever attended one of our summits, you already know what I'm talking about. If you haven't, then this is a great chance to find out.

As usual, to keep these events congenial and collegial, we always limit the attendance. Every summit to date has been a sell-out... so, please don't wait to check your schedule and to register.

See you in Denver!

Statehouses in the Poorhouses

People are not the only ones feeling the pinch. As has been widely reported, so, too, have been the states. This excerpt from the Washington Post may not say it all, but it says a lot...

David again. I can well remember the sense of incredulousness I felt back in 2005 when watching state governments, flush with tax loot as a result of booming real estate and investment markets, passing lavish new spending programs. The financial rationale for the many new programs at the time could best be described as "Happy Times Are Here Forever!"

Well, now they are learning the hard way that they are not, leaving the government worker unions scrambling to retain their grips on the public purse. In California, where a pitched battle has been going on over the soaring deficits, the government unions are taking the stance that their backs are up against the wall. That they have pretty much cut all they can cut and still provide the services that the helpless public demands of them. A contention that someone with a brain and a lot of time on their hands answered by assembling the following list of California state agencies.

California Academic Performance Index (API) * California Access for Infants and Mothers * California Acupuncture Board * California Administrative Office of the Courts * California Adoptions Branch * California African American Museum * California Agricultural Export Program * California Agricultural Labor Relations Board * California Agricultural Statistics Service * California Air Resources Board (CARB) * California Allocation Board * California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority * California Animal Health and Food Safety Services * California Anti-Terrorism Information Center * California Apprenticeship Council * California Arbitration Certification Program * California Architects Board * California Area VI Developmental Disabilities Board * California Arts Council * California Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus * California Assembly Democratic Caucus * California Assembly Republican Caucus * California Athletic Commission * California Attorney General * California Bay Conservation and Development Commission * California Bay-Delta Authority * California Bay-Delta Office * California Biodiversity Council * California Board for Geologists and Geophysicists * California Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors * California Board of Accountancy * California Board of Barbering and Cosmetology * California Board of Behavioral Sciences * California Board of Chiropractic Examiners * California Board of Equalization (BOE) * California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection * California Board of Guide Dogs for the Blind * California Board of Occupational Therapy * California Board of Optometry * California Board of Pharmacy * California Board of Podiatric Medicine * California Board of Prison Terms * California Board of Psychology * California Board of Registered Nursing * California Board of Trustees * California Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians * California Braille and Talking Book Library * California Building Standards Commission * California Bureau for Private Postsecondary and Vocational Education * California Bureau of Automotive Repair * California Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair * California Bureau of Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation * California Bureau of Naturopathic Medicine * California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services * California Bureau of State Audits * California Business Agency * California Business Investment Services (CalBIS) * California Business Permit Information (CalGOLD) * California Business Portal * California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency * California Cal Grants * California CalJOBS * California Cal-Learn Program * California CalVet Home Loan Program * California Career Resource Network * California Cemetery and Funeral Bureau * California Center for Analytical Chemistry * California Center for Distributed Learning * California Center for Teaching Careers (Teach California) * California Chancellor's Office * California Charter Schools * California Children and Families Commission * California Children and Family Services Division * California Citizens Compensation Commission * California Civil Rights Bureau * California Coastal Commission * California Coastal Conservancy * California Code of Regulations * California Collaborative Projects with UC Davis * California Commission for Jobs and Economic Growth * California Commission on Aging * California Commission on Health and Safety and Workers' Compensation * California Commission on Judicial Performance * California Commission on State Mandates * California Commission on Status of Women * California Commission on Teacher Credentialing * California Commission on the Status of Women * California Committee on Dental Auxiliaries * California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office, Junior Colleges * California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office * California Complaint Mediation Program * California Conservation Corps * California Constitution Revision Commission * California Consumer Hotline * California Consumer Information Center * California Consumer Information * California Consumer Services Division * California Consumers and Families Agency * California Contractors State License Board * California Corrections Standards Authority * California Council for the Humanities * California Council on Criminal Justice * California Council on Developmental Disabilities * California Court Reporters Board * California Courts of Appeal * California Crime and Violence Prevention Center * California Criminal Justice Statistics Center * California Criminalistic Institute Forensic Library * California CSGnet Network Management * California Cultural and Historical Endowment * California Cultural Resources Division * California Curriculum and Instructional Leadership Branch * California Data Exchange Center * California Data Management Division * California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission * California Delta Protection Commission * California Democratic Caucus * California Demographic Research Unit * California Dental Auxiliaries * California Department of Aging * California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs * California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board * California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control * California Department of Boating and Waterways (Cal Boating) * California Department of Child Support Services (CDCSS) * California Department of Community Services and Development * California Department of Conservation * California Department of Consumer Affairs * California Department of Corporations * California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation * California Department of Developmental Services * California Department of Education * California Department of Fair Employment and Housing * California Department of Finance * California Department of Financial Institutions * California Department of Fish and Game * California Department of Food and Agriculture * California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) * California Department of General Services * California Department of General Services, Office of State Publishing * California Department of Health Care Services * California Department of Housing and Community Development * California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) * California Department of Insurance * California Department of Justice Firearms Division * California Department of Justice Opinion Unit * California Department of Justice, Consumer Information, Public Inquiry Unit * California Department of Justice * California Department of Managed Health Care * California Department of Mental Health * California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) * California Department of Personnel Administration * California Department of Pesticide Regulation * California Department of Public Health * California Department of Real Estate * California Department of Rehabilitation * California Department of Social Services Adoptions Branch * California Department of Social Services * California Department of Technology Services Training Center (DTSTC) * California Department of Technology Services (DTS) * California Department of Toxic Substances Control * California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) * California Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVets) * California Department of Water Resources * California Departmento de Vehiculos Motorizados * California Digital Library * California Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Certification Program * California Division of Apprenticeship Standards * California Division of Codes and Standards * California Division of Communicable Disease Control * California Division of Engineering * California Division of Environmental and Occupational Disease Control * California Division of Gambling Control * California Division of Housing Policy Development * California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement * California Division of Labor Statistics and Research * California Division of Land and Right of Way * California Division of Land Resource Protection * California Division of Law Enforcement General Library * California Division of Measurement Standards * California Division of Mines and Geology * California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) * California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources * California Division of Planning and Local Assistance * California Division of Recycling * California Division of Safety of Dams * California Division of the State Architect * California Division of Tourism * California Division of Workers' Compensation Medical Unit * California Division of Workers' Compensation * California Economic Assistance, Business and Community Resources * California Economic Strategy Panel * California Education and Training Agency * California Education Audit Appeals Panel * California Educational Facilities Authority * California Elections Division * California Electricity Oversight Board * California Emergency Management Agency * California Emergency Medical Services Authority * California Employment Development Department (EDD) * California Employment Information State Jobs * California Employment Training Panel * California Energy Commission * California Environment and Natural Resources Agency * California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) * California Environmental Resources Evaluation System (CERES) * California Executive Office * California Export Laboratory Services * California Exposition and State Fair (Cal Expo) * California Fair Political Practices Commission * California Fairs and Expositions Division * California Film Commission * California Fire and Resource Assessment Program * California Firearms Division * California Fiscal Services * California Fish and Game Commission * California Fisheries Program Branch * California Floodplain Management * California Foster Youth Help * California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) * California Fraud Division * California Gambling Control Commission * California Geographic Information Systems Council (GIS) * California Geological Survey * California Government Claims and Victim Compensation Board * California Governor's Committee for Employment of Disabled Persons * California Governor's Mentoring Partnership * California Governor's Office of Emergency Services * California Governor's Office of Homeland Security * California Governor's Office of Planning and Research * California Governor's Office * California Grant and Enterprise Zone Programs HCD Loan * California Health and Human Services Agency * California Health and Safety Agency * California Healthy Families Program * California Hearing Aid Dispensers Bureau * California High-Speed Rail Authority * California Highway Patrol (CHP) * California History and Culture Agency * California Horse Racing Board * California Housing Finance Agency * California Indoor Air Quality Program * California Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission * California Industrial Welfare Commission * California InFoPeople * California Information Center for the Environment * California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (I-Bank) * California Inspection Services * California Institute for County Government * California Institute for Education Reform * California Integrated Waste Management Board * California Interagency Ecological Program * California Job Service * California Junta Estatal de Personal * California Labor and Employment Agency * California Labor and Workforce Development Agency * California Labor Market Information Division * California Land Use Planning Information Network (LUPIN) * California Lands Commission * California Landscape Architects Technical Committee * California Latino Legislative Caucus * California Law Enforcement Branch * California Law Enforcement General Library * California Law Revision Commission * California Legislative Analyst's Office * California Legislative Black Caucus * California Legislative Counsel * California Legislative Division * California Legislative Information * California Legislative Lesbian, Gay , Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Caucus * California Legislature Internet Caucus * California Library Development Services * California License and Revenue Branch * California Major Risk Medical Insurance Program * California Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board * California Maritime Academy * California Marketing Services * California Measurement Standards * California Medical Assistance Commission * California Medical Care Services * California Military Department * California Mining and Geology Board * California Museum for History, Women, and the Arts * California Museum Resource Center * California National Guard * California Native American Heritage Commission * California Natural Community Conservation Planning Program * California New Motor Vehicle Board * California Nursing Home Administrator Program * California Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board * California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board * California Ocean Resources Management Program * California Office of Administrative Hearings * California Office of Administrative Law * California Office of AIDS * California Office of Binational Border Health * California Office of Child Abuse Prevention * California Office of Deaf Access * California Office of Emergency Services (OES) * California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment * California Office of Fiscal Services * California Office of Fleet Administration * California Office of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Implementation (CalOHI) * California Office of Historic Preservation * California Office of Homeland Security * California Office of Human Resources * California Office of Legal Services * California Office of Legislation * California Office of Lieutenant Governor * California Office of Military and Aerospace Support * California Office of Mine Reclamation * California Office of Natural Resource Education * California Office of Privacy Protection * California Office of Public School Construction * California Office of Real Estate Appraisers * California Office of Risk and Insurance Management * California Office of Services to the Blind * California Office of Spill Prevention and Response * California Office of State Publishing (OSP) * California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development * California Office of Systems Integration * California Office of the Inspector General * California Office of the Ombudsman * California Office of the Patient Advocate * California Office of the President * California Office of the Secretary for Education * California Office of the State Fire Marshal * California Office of the State Public Defender * California Office of Traffic Safety * California Office of Vital Records * California Online Directory * California Operations Control Office * California Opinion Unit * California Outreach and Technical Assistance Network (OTAN) * California Park and Recreation Commission * California Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) * California Performance Review (CPR) * California Permit Information for Business (CalGOLD) * California Physical Therapy Board * California Physician Assistant Committee * California Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services * California Policy and Evaluation Division * California Political Reform Division * California Pollution Control Financing Authority * California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo * California Postsecondary Education Commission * California Prevention Services * California Primary Care and Family Health * California Prison Industry Authority * California Procurement Division * California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) * California Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) * California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) * California Real Estate Services Division * California Refugee Programs Branch * California Regional Water Quality Control Boards * California Registered Veterinary Technician Committee * California Registrar of Charitable Trusts * California Republican Caucus * California Research and Development Division * California Research Bureau * California Resources Agency * California Respiratory Care Board * California Rivers Assessment * California Rural Health Policy Council * California Safe Schools * California San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission * California San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy * California San Joaquin River Conservancy * California School to Career * California Science Center * California Scripps Institution of Oceanography * California Secretary of State Business Portal * California Secretary of State * California Seismic Safety Commission * California Self Insurance Plans (SIP) * California Senate Office of Research * California Small Business and Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Certification Program * California Small Business Development Center Program * California Smart Growth Caucus * California Smog Check Information Center * California Spatial Information Library * California Special Education Division * California Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Board * California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) * California Standards and Assessment Division * California State Administrative Manual (SAM) * California State Allocation Board * California State and Consumer Services Agency * California State Architect * California State Archives * California State Assembly * California State Association of Counties (CSAC) *0ACalifornia State Board of Education * California State Board of Food and Agriculture * California Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) * California State Children's Trust Fund * California State Compensation Insurance Fund * California State Contracts Register Program * California State Contracts Register * California State Controller * California State Council on Developmental Disabilities (SCDD) * California State Disability Insurance (SDI) * California State Fair (Cal Expo) * California State Jobs Employment Information * California State Lands Commission * California State Legislative Portal * California State Legislature * California State Library Catalog * California State Library Services Bureau * California State Library * California State Lottery * California State Mediation and Conciliation Service * California State Mining and Geology Board * California State Park and Recreation Commission * California State Parks * California State Personnel Board * California State Polytechnic University, Pomona * California State Railroad Museum * California State Science Fair * California State Senate * California State Summer School for Mathematics and Science (COSMOS) * California State Summer School for the Arts * California State Superintendent of Public Instruction * California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) * California State Treasurer * California State University Center for Distributed Learning * California State University, Bakersfield * California State University, Channel Islands * California State University, Chico * California State University, Dominguez Hills * California State University, East Bay * California State University, Fresno * California State University, Fullerton * California State University, Long Beach * California State University, Los Angeles * California State University, Monterey Bay * California State University, Northridge * California State University, Sacramento * California State University, San Bernardino * California State University, San Marcos * California State University, Stanislaus * California State University (CSU) * California State Water Project Analysis Office * California State Water Project * California State Water Resources Control Board * California Structural Pest Control Board * California Student Aid Commission * California Superintendent of Public Instruction * California Superior Courts * California Tahoe Conservancy * California Task Force on Culturally and Linguistically Competent Physicians and Dentists * California Tax Information Center * California Technology and Administration Branch Finance * California Telecommunications Division * California Telephone Medical Advice Services (TMAS) * California Transportation Commission * California Travel and Transportation Agency * California Unclaimed Property Program * California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board * California Unemployment Insurance Program * California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission * California Veterans Board * California Veterans Memorial * California Veterinary Medical Board and Registered Veterinary Technician Examining Committee * California Veterinary Medical Board * California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board * California Volunteers * California Voter Registration * California Water Commission * California Water Environment Association (CWEA) * California Water Resources Control Board * California Welfare to Work Division * California Wetlands Information System * California Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch * California Wildlife Conservation Board * California Wildlife Programs Branch * California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) * California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board * California Workforce and Labor Development Agency * California Workforce Investment Board * California Youth Authority (CYA) * Central Valley Flood Protection Board * Center for California Studies * Colorado River Board of California * Counting California * Dental Board of California * Health Insurance Plan of California (PacAdvantage) * Humboldt State University * Jobs with the State of California * Judicial Council of California * Learn California * Library of California * Lieutenant Governor's Commission for One California * Little Hoover Commission (on California State Government Organization and Economy) * Medical Board of California * Medi-Cal * Osteopathic Medical Board of California * Physical Therapy Board of California * Regents of the University of California * San Diego State University * San Francisco State University * San José Stat e University * Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy * State Bar of California * Supreme Court of California * Teach California * University of California * University of California, Berkeley * University of California, Davis * University of California, Hastings College of the Law * University of California, Irvine * University of California, Los Angeles * University of California, Merced * University of California, Riverside * University of California, San Diego * University of California, San Francisco * University of California, Santa Barbara * University of California, Santa Cruz * Veterans Home of California

David again... finally. I wonder how many of those agencies existed 50 years ago? And I wonder, really, what would happen if they closed half of those agencies and cut the budgets of the survivors by half?

We may find out.

Report from CYCLE

A few weeks back I mentioned CYCLE 2008 (Casey's Youth Conference for Liberty and Entrepreneurship), the week-long camp for young entrepreneurs that we sponsor in Lithuania. Louis James of our team organized this year's event, and the reviews have been very positive. Happily, even though we mentioned CYCLE at the last moment, a couple of Casey subscribers were able to arrange things to have their own children participate. Here's an excerpt from the notes of one, Natalie.

Up to this point, these camps have only been held annually, in Eastern Europe, but we are considering holding them more frequently and in other areas of the world, including North America. While there may be some commercial gain to be made by expanding this initiative (and no apologies for that), the reality is that there is a dearth of opportunities available to young people these days to learn about the free market and how to succeed in it. Maybe we can do some good.

So, what do you think? Good idea or not? Do you know a kid that could benefit from an immersion course in freedom and free markets? Drop us a note at info@CaseyResearch.com and let us know. We'll keep you posted on any developments.

Too Funny

I have to share this, because it is classic Doug Casey, and I laugh every time I think of it.

The setup is that the nation's media fell all over itself to say kind things in obituaries about Robert McNamara, the former defense secretary who presided over Vietnam and who shed his mortal coil this week.

Louis James, who does the interviews for our new free e-letter, Conversations with Casey, thought that McNamara's passing was something that might have caught Doug's attention and so asked him about it. The result, in addition to being spot on, included some memorable lines, my favorite coming as a result of a follow-on about why the media was so complimentary of the man.

Doug:

If you aren't signed up for Conversations with Casey, it gets very high reviews, and I guarantee you'll never find it dull. Sign up for it here, and don't forget to pass it along!

Miscellany

Casey Phyle News.
- Bend, Oregon, Up and Running. A group of Casey subscribers have started meeting regularly in Bend, Oregon.
- Kansas City Phyle will be having their first meeting very soon.
- SoCal Phyle's Next Meeting Set for July 18, from 1:30 to 5:00 pm. The largest and most active Casey phyle is hosting a program with a speaker reporting on his recent trip to Uruguay, and another from Italy who will be discussing the European perspective on the crisis. The meet-up is at the Steelhead Brewing Company in Irvine California, and space is limited.
If you are in any of those neighborhoods and want to join in the fun, drop us a note at phyles@CaseyResearch.com and we'll get you connected.
Big Changes Coming. Watch your email inbox for an announcement on some exciting and significant changes here at Casey Research. One of those changes will be that this weekly experiment in musing will be going daily (at least for a trial period, likely beginning July 20). The name of the publication will change, too... to Casey's Daily Dispatch. That's just the tip of the iceberg, but I wanted to let you in on the new name now. Watch for the announcement of additional changes soon...

And That's That for This Week

As I sign off this week, the S&P 500 is off 62 points, a slight improvement from earlier in the day, but still well established on a negative down slope, exacerbated, no doubt, by the latest news that the sentiments of consumers are growing less cheery (gee, I wonder why that could be?).

With duty calling, I must now sign off, thanking you for reading and for being a Casey Research subscriber.

Until next week, remember... good things can happen in bad times – if you are sufficiently prepared and have the right attitude.

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

The Room – 03/16/2009

David Galland — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:55:42 GMT

Dear Reader,

This week I tripped over an old musical favorite, I'm Your Captain, by Grand Funk Railroad, which is what I'm listening to as I begin this weekly missive.

While the song has a little rust on it, for those of you who haven't taken a ride on Grand Funk Railroad of late, it's a nice enough trip. You can listen to it here.

Now, on to what seems important this week.

Citi-Mae

This week Vikram Pandit, the CEO of Citigroup, a bank that has managed to lose $38 billion over the last five quarters, sent around an internal memorandum in which he said he was "encouraged" by the company's performance so far in 2009.

This fig leaf was enough to light the fuse to a pretty decent rally in U.S. stocks.

Looking at the Citigroup stock chart over the last three years, I have a hard time believing that there is anything left to be discouraged about.

The government's efforts to keep the mega-bank afloat to date have been nothing short of herculean, with infusions of over $45 billion in new capital. As important, the Treasury and its many agencies have agreed to cover losses from over $300 billion in toxic paper held by Citi. (With the new TALF plan, they can go much, much higher than that, if required.)

With that sort of support, it is safe to assume that the bank has been chosen by Team Obama to survive... though in a form that may be less than satisfying to existing shareholders.

Several things jump off the page when reading the biography of Vikram Pandit, the aforementioned CEO of Citi.

The first is that he is an impressive guy: lots of degrees, directorships, and high-level work experience... all of the right sort of credentials. You know, the sort possessed by the very same best and brightest who helped bring Wall Street to its knees in the first place.

Second, he seems to lack certain restraints when it comes to OPM (other people's money), witnessed by the fact that it was he who stubbornly insisted on going forward with the purchase of a new $50 million private jet for the company – this after receiving the aforementioned bailout. (Not to mention that the jet was to be of French manufacture, adding a measure of salt to American wounds.)

Most importantly, however, is that he clearly has a knack for making good deals for bad assets. Case in point, he sold Old Lane Partners, an underperforming hedge fund with just $4.5 billion under management, to CitiGroup for $800 million -- a truly ridiculous amount. He personally made close to $200 million on the deal.

And now, it seems, he's trying to engineer the same sort of buy-out for CitiGroup... but this time the buyer is... you!

Specifically, Citi has offered to convert the preferred shares held by the Treasury into common stock, effectively finishing the process of seeing the bank nationalized. Quoting Financial Week...

Wall Street Journal

The fact that an internal memo from a drowning bank in a crashing economy can ignite a strong rally tells us that at least some investors are tiring of the bear market, and are willing to throw down cash in the hope that it's time for the bull to run again. So, we could see the market rally for a bit longer, but the odds remain good that it's a bear market trap.

In the case of Citi-Mae – my suggestion for the company's post-nationalization name – we the people will soon be responsible for the company's mountain of dubious debt from tens of millions of credit card accounts, mortgages, commercial paper... and that's just for starters.

No wonder Mr. Pandit is so enthusiastic.

Wen Is Enough?

This week, we had a swarm of China-related stories. In one, China's premier Wen Jiabao took time during his annual press conference to express his concern about the safety of China's holdings of Treasuries, warning the U.S. government, in so many words, that China is now paying close attention to its financial affairs. The implied threat being that, should the constant currency abuse escalate, they might consider taking their renminbis elsewhere.

"Nonsense," say the punditry, explaining authoritatively that China doesn't have any option but to continue propping up the dollar. After all, selling their Treasuries would devastate the value of their hundreds of billions of dollar-based holdings. A weaker dollar would also make China's export-reliant economy less competitive, pushing said economy even further onto the reef.

"True," I answer, speaking aloud to no one but my sleeping dog. "But it's worth harking back to April 2001 and Hainan Island in the South China Sea."

Newshounds among you will recognize the time and the place as the location of what the media likes to call an "incident" between the forces of China and the U.S. Specifically, after colliding with a harassing Chinese military jet, a damaged U.S. spy plane was forced to land on Hainan Island where it was captured by the Chinese military.

And there the plane, and its crew of 24, sat for almost two weeks. Despite the U.S. government's most strident diplomatic efforts, including getting really red in the face, the Chinese simply refused to release the crew or the plane. It was only after the U.S. government bowed to China's unswerving demand that it issued an official apology – which it did on April 11, that the crew was allowed to leave, on April 12.

The spy plane, however, was not allowed to leave until mid-July... and then only in the pieces that Chinese engineers left it in after dismantling it and going through it with a tortoise shell comb.

At the time, the Chinese government was exporting over $100 billion a year of product to the U.S. Didn't seem to concern them in the slightest at the time that the U.S. was making all sorts of hollow threats about the spy plane.

So, now that Chinese exports to the U.S. are about three times the level they were in 2001, are the Chinese three times more likely not to want to cause trouble for the U.S. today?

Didn't seem that way when, this week, five Chinese boats harassed a U.S. spy ship operating in international waters, 75 miles off China's coast. My favorite part of the incident was when one of the Chinese ships got so close that the U.S. Navy ship, U.S.S. Impeccable, opened fire with a water cannon. In response, the Chinese crew stripped down to their underwear and enjoyed a mid-week shower.

It reminds me of the classic scene in Monty Python and the Holy Grail, when the crusaders demand the surrender of the French castle.

Why, look, thanks to the wonders of YouTube, you can watch it here!

The point, however, is simply this: people are people wherever you go... but they have certain cultural idiosyncrasies. The Afghans, for instance, possess a strong national pride about having taken on – and defeated – the masters of the universe at any given time. Denny Crane from Boston Legal would sum up their martial confidence by intoning, "Never lost, never will." And so, we can expect them to rise up every time they are invaded.

Likewise, the Chinese have a reputation for not allowing themselves to be dictated to by foreign governments, unless, of course, said foreigners arrive with an army, as did the Japanese in WWII.

Thus, should the current administration conclude in their many weighty calculations that the Chinese have no choice but to scrape and bow to the mighty dollar, they risk making a gross miscalculation... in this case, one that could bring what's left of the U.S. economy to its knees.

It is worth pondering, however, whether the Chinese may begin to march to their own drummer, no matter what the U.S. does or doesn't do, at this point. I say that because, whether out of national pride or the realization that the debt-fueled economic engine of U.S. consumption is terminally broken, there is little question that China is turning its attention to stimulating its own economy by inward-looking spending. Versus, say, investing that money in non-yielding U.S. Treasuries, especially of the riskier long-dated variety.

The situation is directly analogous to the build-out of the interstate highway system here in the U.S., a topic I touched on in passing recently. The build-out of that system, which finally got underway during Eisenhower's administration in 1956, cost about $100 billion to complete. While I don't have time to go deep here, there is little argument that the interstate highway system helped grease the skids of commerce, paying back the government's investment many times over through a variety of transport-related taxes and overall improvements in GDP.

In constant dollar terms, the U.S. GDP in January of 1947 was $1.570 trillion. By January of 1957, as the interstate highway system was getting built, GDP had risen to $2,300 trillion, a 46% increase. By January of 1966, however, GDP had reached $3,372 trillion, a 60% increase over the preceding ten-year period. While I can't attribute the additional gain to the growing highway system, there is little question it was a contributor.

The point I am trying to make is that the Chinese leadership is very capable of figuring out the benefits of better and more highways, ports, dams, electrical lines, and other infrastructure improvements ... and of deciding that continuing to lend to the world's biggest debtor won't pay off nearly as much, over the long run, as using their pile of cash to finish building out their own key infrastructure.

Nothing stays the same in this world, except human nature, that is. The Chinese, with their hundreds of billions in reserves, and 1.4 billion people, are not going to stay in place. At the point when they decide it is time to look inward, and that point may be now, the world's financial regime will begin to change.

Sure, the U.S. monetary hegemony could be maintained for awhile longer, and likely will. But there are no guarantees, and to dismiss the Chinese as whipped dogs could be a very big miscalculation.

Since we're on the topic of China's infrastructure build-out, Simon Black and Fitzroy McLean from Without Borders have uncovered a China-based cement company that is uniquely well positioned to profit. To learn how you can profit from the remaking of China's infrastructure, visit this link.

Before moving on, I came across the following chart I thought you might find of interest. It presents a breakdown of what it is the Chinese sell the U.S. so much of. Looking the chart over, it's easy to conclude that Chinese exports to the U.S. are only going to come under more pressure (not a lot of furniture changing hands just now, I suspect). That lessens the importance that the Chinese will attribute to their U.S. relationship in the future.

Speaking of Exports

I don't watch much television but do make an exception for Survivor on CBS every Thursday night. I like the show because it offers the voyeuristic experience of watching members of the Homo sapiens species as they cavort around in more primitive tribal settings. With much of the bling and bluster stripped away, what's left to observe is the hominid mind at its most calculating as it schemes to climb over the heads of its fellows to win a million dollars.

Last night, as I waited for the show to begin, I was treated to a spot of local news, the top story being that the Burlington City Council had rewarded a bridge rebuilding contract to an out-of-state construction company. Members of the local citizenry were interviewed and were uniformly outraged. "There are local companies desperate for work, and they give the job to a company from Maine! Unbelievable!"

It's an interesting philosophical conundrum. After all, the land and the people of Vermont and neighboring Maine couldn't be any more homogeneous. Okay, so maybe they eat lobster with more regularity... but other than that, it's mostly about some lines on a map and small differences in local ordinances.

Live and let eat, I say, but I suspect most of the tribe would disagree. At least if you pay attention to all the "Buy Local" bumper stickers being sported around these days.

(Sometimes, the sloganeers try to show a broader mind, expanding the phrase to "Think globally, act locally"... which is really just a dressed-up way of saying the same thing.)
As is well demonstrated on Survivor, when things are going well around camp... say, after having won a reward challenge against the other team and finding yourself surrounded with sundry food items and maybe a few beers, then humanity is all good cheer and generosity.

But lose a string of challenges, resulting in a depleted food supply and sleeping in the rain under poor shelter, and the human character soon forgets all sense of charity and each individual looks with steely eyes to their own needs.

The broader economy is much the same, if for no other reason than it is really nothing more than the sum total of human action.

While the connection may be hard to see at this moment, this week it was reported that both imports and exports have fallen yet again. According to Bloomberg...

imports

exports

Echoing the theme of this section, there was also this...

Christopher Low

Reducing these matters to a more understandable level, we come back to the case of Burlington and the Maine-based bridge builder. Or, to a positively human scale, by looking to the weekly lesson provided by Survivor. To wit, the world is beginning to wonder where its next meal is coming from, and they are not about to let some other person/state/country beat them to it.

The U.S. has already let its intentions be known by passing the "Buy American" provision in the new stimulus package.

The Swiss this week made their intentions clear by announcing that they were going to actively intervene in the foreign exchange markets in an attempt to weaken their currency and therefore make their products more competitive to consumers in other nations. They will do so by buying up the currencies of their largest trading partners. The Japanese have tried this move, as have the Chinese and others. Soon, everyone will be doing it.

In its write-up on the Swiss move, the Wall Street Journal opined...

As the U.S., while wounded, is still the world's single largest market, it's likely to be the currency against which most others try to depreciate (the Swiss are likely to focus on the euro, however).

Paradoxically, to some extent the U.S. is a willing "victim" in this manipulation, as the greater buying pressure on the U.S. dollar allows the Fed to print, print, print without having the debasement of the currency become apparent.

Of course, it will hurt U.S. exports if the currencies of our major trading partners fall in comparison to the dollar, but for the time being, a strong dollar helps to reduce the cost of energy imports and other such essentials. And it masks the prolific spending now underway, and further envisioned, by the Obama administration.

The problem, of course, is when all those dollars begin to flow back this way... for example, when the Fed finally crosses the line and governments around the world decide it is now in their best interest to rid themselves of the greenback.

It won't happen overnight or probably anytime real soon... but at this rate, it is all but a given.

Snippets from the Swamp

Donald Grove, our stalwart Washington correspondent, took time out of his busy day to shoot over a couple of updates on the never-ending machinations now underway in the corridors of power. ..

Making Friends with Crisis

Never waste a good crisis

Feeding Frenzy

Gold Stocks – a Knock at the Door

While it is not much of a payoff for the one hour that our own Louis James, editor of the Casey Investment Alert and International Speculator, spent on the phone with the reporter, the fact that Barron's did an article at all on the attraction of investing in junior gold explorers is worth noting.

You can read "Thar's Green in Them Thar Gold Stocks" via the link here.

Then there was the article from Newsweek, also this week, titled "Cash in a Mattress? No, Gold in the Closet." While the author is clearly a skeptic – which I think is healthy, frankly – the fact that gold is beginning to show up more and more in mainstream media will only add to its luster.

Here's an excerpt from the piece...

The price of gold is near an all time high—it topped $1,000 an ounce on March 13—yet the number of Americans who are taking delivery of gold coins and bars is rising. According to the World Gold Council, Americans bought 600 tons of gold bars and coins in 2008, a 42 percent increase over 2007. That's not as much as in Europe, where gold mania has become epidemic—but significant given the metal's high price. An uptick in the U.S. economy, and buyers are likely to find they've been part of a giant, golden bubble.

And for those of you with more time on your hands, here's a link to the full article.

Miscellany

The Greater Depression -- How Did It Come About? As I was going to press, I received this link to a Saturday Night Live skit that gave me a couple of chuckles. As we can all use all the chuckles we can get just now, here's the link. (And, please, for those of you who are from either side of the political spectrum who may take offense, please don't... satire is as American as running a trade deficit.)
Mea Culpa. In the current edition of The Casey Report, we included a chart showing the performance of various recent short recommendations, compared to the S&P 500. None of our recent shorts has been nearly as profitable as that of GE from our December article, "Shorting the Big Debtors." The only problem is that we equivocated on that recommendation, then in January, due to concerns over the possibility of government action, and actually formally announced we were not going to recommend making the short.

Thus, the graphic was wrong and could rightfully be misconstrued as misleading. The simple fact is that while we were right in bringing GE to readers' attention as a short candidate when it was trading much higher than it is today... we didn't follow through with a formal recommendation, and so we cannot claim it.

I won't go into a long explanation of how this screw-up happened, other than to say that it was an honest mistake by a researcher and a lack of attention on my part as managing editor. It has now been fixed in the edition.
Phyle News. By all accounts, the recent phyle meeting in Toronto where Louis James, Jeff Clark, and Doug Hornig stopped by was a big success. Angus, thanks for inviting the team to participate, and thanks to the group as well.

Meanwhile, the Calgary Phyle, which hosted the very first meet-up of Casey Research subscribers, will be getting together at the Cadence Coffee, 6407 Bowness Road NW on April 7 at 7:00 pm. You can get questions answered, or RSVP, by emailing calgaryphyle@yahoo.ca . Alex, the owner of Cadence Coffee, is the organizer of the phyle. If you can't make it to the April 7 get-together, stop by any time and introduce yourself as a fellow subscriber.
Argentina in Las Vegas. For those of you heading to our sold-out Crisis & Opportunity Summit, I wanted to mention that David "Santiago" McIlvaine from Doug's La Estancia de Cafayate project in Argentina, as well as Jack Zehren, the lead architect and land planner for the project, will be at the event. Property owners can catch up on the latest, and anyone interesting in learning more can do so.

And that, dear readers, is that for this week. As I sign off, I see the stock market is about flat, but still well up on the week. Gold has had a good day, topping $930, but coming back slightly. As you may remember, as I was writing this missive last week, I took a quick break to short the broader market... and was well up by the end of the day. A little while before the market closed, I got distracted long enough to miss the window to sell and lock in my profit, and then stubbornly hung on... the net result being a good thwacking as the stock market soared this week. Fortunately, I also bought some GLD as the gold market briefly dipped below $900 and so my net losses are minor, and I'm still holding both my short and my GLD as the week comes to a close.

While I do think the stock market could rally more here, I just can't see a sustained rally at this point. Could happen, but if it did, I'd be okay, because I am not leveraged or playing (a good word) with money I can't afford to lose.

The markets remain unpredictable and dangerous at this point. So caution is the word...

Until next week, when I'll be writing from Las Vegas, thank you for reading and for being a subscriber to a Casey Research service.

Sincerely,

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

The Room - 10/24/2008

David Galland — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:47:33 GMT

Dear Readers,

I have woken in the pre-dawn to find our direst predictions coming true, with global stock markets taking yet another pounding and U.S. stock futures limit down.

Serving as a proxy for the mindset now gripping governments around the world, French President Sarkozy has announced that the French government will, henceforth, buy shares in important French companies in an attempt to prop them up.

"We will intervene massively whenever a strategic enterprise needs our money," said Sarkozy, a supposed economic conservative, as he pounded the table on behalf of nationalizing industry.

The New Age of big government is upon us. Armed with Harry Potter-like magical monetary wands, they are wildly conjuring a deluge of money from thin air to bind the free market and keep it from facilitating the resolution of economic and investment dislocations created over decades.

Bud Conrad tells me he is having a hard time adding up all the fiat money that has been committed to the battle for economic – and, by extension, political – survival over the past couple of months. The numbers rolling off the lips of officialdumb have progressed well past the hundreds of millions, or even hundreds of billions, and have now reached the trillions.

In that theme, the Fed announced this week that it would drop over half a trillion – $540 billion, to be exact – on the purchase of suspect commercial paper now clogging the portfolios of "safe harbor" money market funds. Given that there is a total of $3.4 trillion of your money resting in those very same funds, the commitment of $540 billion – about 16% of the total – should be taken as an indicator of just how bad the problem really is.

A friend of mine, employed as an executive in the money fund business, worried aloud to me over a cup of coffee a couple of months back that if even 5% of the total holdings were found lacking, the huge money market complex that provides his paycheck would be in deep trouble. That the Fed is opening the bid with 16%, therefore, says much.

Now my friend doesn't need to worry... his hefty paycheck is secured, compliments of Uncle Sam or, more accurately, the suckers whose pockets he so smoothly picks. Similarly, the stock portfolios of French shareholders are also now secure, compliments of Sarkozy.

On the topic of suckers, there is an old poker saw that goes, "If you are playing poker and within 30 minutes you can't figure out who the sucker is, it's you."

Well, the game has now been going on for about 50 years, and the average taxpayer is still glancing around, bug-eyed, trying to figure out who the sucker is.

They are about to find out.

The Trial of Gold

They filed into the docket, faces bright and smiley despite the shackles around their arms. The leader of the gang, Mr. Gold, was pushed forward into the defendant's chair. The rest, including Ms. Silver as well as the members of the resource share clan, Biggie Goldshares, Junior Goldshares and Ms. Silvershares, were manhandled onto the hard bench just behind. Rather than looking discomforted at the treatment or the ugly smells and sounds of the crowded courtroom, they just looked around pleasantly, as if on a church-sponsored outing to the local zoo.

Calling the court to order, the bailiff announced that all should rise for the judge. Shortly thereafter, Judge Market entered from stage left, a stern look in his eye. Approaching the dais, he arranged his robes around him and took his seat before gaveling the court to session.

The trial of Gold had begun.

"Mr. Gold, you and your cohorts have been accused of misleading investors into thinking that you would help them preserve their wealth, when exactly the opposite has been true of late. How do you plead?"

"Not guilty, Your Honor," Mr. Gold answered brightly, receiving a dour look in return.

"Mr. Cuomo, you may question the witness," Judge Market announced impatiently.

As Mr. Gold made himself comfortable in the witness stand, Andrew "Son of" Cuomo, taking a break from his well-oiled political career, I mean, job as New York attorney general, to serve as the public prosecutor in this high-profile case, rose smoothly to his feet, patted an imaginary loose hair into place, shot his cuffs, and approached the defendant.

"Mr. Gold, behind me in this court are good folks, hard-working folks, who believed in you. Yet you have failed to perform as advertised. How can you sit there, all shiny, and claim that you have not deceived the public in this regard?"

A pleasant and, some might say, radiant smile fixed on his face, Mr. Gold responded in an even voice. "I'm just a simple metal. I've never made any claims one way or another, so I don't know where people got it into their heads that I'm anything special. But for thousands of years now, people have been chasing after me, all over the world. Beats me why."

"Your Honor, if I may." The defense attorney, Mr. Reason, rose to his feet.

"Yes?" asked Judge Market, looking grumpy.

"I know it's a bit unusual, but Mr. Gold is not exaggerating when he says he's, well, kind of simple. If it pleases the court, it might speed things along if I could ask some expert witnesses to assist in answering the prosecutor's questions. Can do?"

"Highly irregular," said the Judge, glancing over at Mr. Gold where he sat, his smile and countenance oddly reassuring in the dark, smelly courtroom. "Mr. Cuomo, any objection?"

Seeing the fond looks in the eyes of many in the courtroom as they stared, fixated, at Mr. Gold... and after a quick consultation with his internal popularity meter and coming to the conclusion that he didn't want to appear mean-spirited, Cuomo nodded in agreement.

"Thank you," Mr. Reason said reasonably. "Then I would like to ask the Ghost of Murray Rothbard to join Mr. Gold on the witness stand."

As the court watched, their collective mouths somewhat agape, Rothbard's ghost floated softly to the witness stand and landed on the rail next to Mr. Gold, who winked at him amicably.

"Ahh, okay, well..." Mr. Cuomo, stammered, looking a little discomforted by the sight of Rothbard's ghost, his transparent bow tie ruffled slightly by some unfelt celestial wind. "How do you answer the charge against Mr. Gold that he has lured people to him under false pretenses?"

"I'd like to answer by quoting from an excellent book on the topic, the very best, in my opinion," said Rothbard's ghost with a wry smile. "It's called The Mystery of Banking and it is written by... me!"

In all countries and all civilizations, two commodities have been dominant whenever they were available to compete as moneys with other commodities: gold and silver.

At first, gold and silver were highly prized only for their luster and ornamental value. They were always in great demand. Second, they were always relatively scarce, and hence valuable per unit of weight. And for that reason they were portable as well. They were also divisible, and could be sliced into thin segments without losing their pro rata value. Finally, silver or gold were blended with small amounts of alloy to harden them, and since they did not corrode, they would last almost forever.

Thus, because gold and silver are supremely "moneylike" commodities, they are selected by markets as money if they are available. Proponents of the gold standard do not suffer from a mysterious "gold fetish." They simply recognize that gold has always been selected by the market as money throughout history.

Generally, gold and silver have both been moneys, side-by-side. Since gold has always been far scarcer and also in greater demand than silver, it has always commanded a higher price, and tends to be money in larger transactions, while silver has been used in smaller exchanges. Because of its higher price, gold has often been selected as the unit of account, although this has not always been true. The difficulties of mining gold, which makes its production limited, make its long-term value relatively more stable than silver.

Concluding with a large smile and a wave of the hand, Rothbard's ghost graciously accepted Mr. Reason's words of gratitude for taking time out of his schedule to make an appearance, then stood on the rail of the witness box and, with a flourish, took a deep bow before flying out the door to return to his ethereal seat in the heavenly branch of the Austrian School of Economics.

Mr. Cuomo played for a moment with a well-manicured cuticle before whipping around, his finger jabbing in the direction of Mr. Gold. His voice rose dramatically.

"And what, Mr. Gold, do you have to say on the topic of inflation? Can you deny that you and your friends claim to be inflation hedges? If so, then how do you answer to the fact that you are now selling for a lower nominal price than back in 1980! And, in inflation-adjusted terms, you are well behind! You, sir, are a fraud!"

Mr. Gold's smile remained unchanged, his countenance pleasant as always. "I'm sorry, but I really don't understand what you are talking about."

Mr. Reason again took to his feet. "Mr. Cuomo, if I may?"

"Oh, alright. Have at it."

"The defense calls Terry Coxon of The Casey Report. Mr. Coxon, would you be so kind to answer Mr. Cuomo's question."

Coxon made his way from a seat at the back of the courtroom where he had been enjoying the show and walked over to stand next to the witness box. Unable to help himself, he reached out and gave Mr. Gold a pat on the arm.

"So, Mr. Coxon," Son-of-Cuomo barked, "How do you explain that in 1980, gold touched $850. And here, 28 years later, it is trading for less than that – even though inflation has been persistent throughout the period. The claim that gold is an inflation hedge is simply false!"

Speaking slowly, to be sure that Mr. Cuomo understood, Coxon replied...

What moves gold isn't the rate of inflation but the change in the rate of inflation.

When people expect higher inflation, they bid up gold. When people expect lower inflation, demand for gold drops, even though "lower" may still be very high. That's why gold trended down in the 1980s, even though the inflation rate was high. The inflation rate was high, but it was declining.

There is a simple reason for this relationship. Gold and the dollar are both a store of value. Gold is more reliable in the long run, and the dollar is more reliable over shorter periods. Because they do somewhat the same thing for their owners, they are competing products, but with different attributes.

For example, the cost of holding dollars for their usefulness as a store of value is the gradual erosion of purchasing power -- price inflation. In a period of rising inflation, using dollars for storing value becomes relatively more expensive than using gold. So the demand for gold increases. And since the supply of gold – in ounces – is nearly fixed, the price per ounce goes up.

To sum it up, the price of gold is lower today than in 1980 because the rate of inflation now is lower -- much lower -- than in 1980.

Judge Market looked thoughtfully at Mr. Gold. "Mr. Cuomo, any more questions for this witness?"

"Not at this time, Your Honor," Cuomo said, flicking an imaginary piece of dust off the sleeve of his silk suit as Coxon returned to his seat and the bag of popcorn he had left there.

"But I do have a question for you!" he said, with a glare at Mr. Gold. "You sit there so calm, nonchalant, even. The public looks to you to remain a bastion of stability in challenging times. But as the financial crisis has swept over the land, you have been gyrating wildly. I accuse you of luring in investors by pretending to be calm, but in actual fact being dangerously volatile!"

Mr. Gold smiled and shrugged. Again, Mr. Reason took to his pins.

"I'd like to call Jeff Clark, editor of Big Gold. I believe he has some charts that might help in answering that charge. Mr. Clark."

His step enthusiastic, Clark walked briskly up to the bailiff and handed him two charts, which were, in turn, dutifully walked up to Judge Market.

"We'll call these exhibits A and B," said Judge Market, pulling on a pair of tortoise shell specs for a closer look.

From the wings, an overhead projector was presented and Clark walked over to it, flipped it on, and laid flat a transparency. Helpfully, the bailiff lowered the lights a touch.

"I think gold has gotten a bum rap," Clark began, his face aglow from the light of the projector and, perhaps, his passion for the subject at hand.

"In fact, despite recent weakness, between January 1, 2007 and October 10, 2008, when I prepared this chart, gold is up 42.6% while the bellwether S&P 500 is down 36.9%.

"For my second chart, I'd like to address the notion that gold is more volatile than stocks," Clark said, sliding exhibit A from the projector and replacing it with exhibit B.

Mr. Cuomo, thinking about the whupping his own portfolio of Wall Street darlings had taken of late, turned to Jeff Clark and almost spat out, "Since we're on the topic of stocks, let's talk about the big gold stocks. They were supposed to do better than the physical metals, but they have been hammered just as hard or even harder than many other stock sectors!"

In the back of the room, Biggie Goldshares examined his shoes, while Clark cleared his throat and said...

No stock has escaped undamaged in the global carnage, including gold stocks. The down-drafts have been breathtaking, and it's easy to imagine that gold stocks will just keep falling. Here's what happened...

For starters, hedge funds continued deleveraging, which can cause significant moves in market prices due to their use of margin. Withdrawals in U.S. hedge funds hit $43 billion in September alone. Meanwhile, mutual funds and "basket of commodities" ETFs continued selling off due to disappointed, or frightened, investors. This means the good was sold along with the bad. Add in the intensifying fear in the marketplace and few buyers were to be found.

Second, as the sea of red numbers continued splashing across headline news, investors fled in droves. Many simply didn't want to be the last one out of what they believed was a burning building, so "Dump everything!" was the mantra. Many stocks, in a perverse use of logic, were sold because they had value. Lots of investors simply fled to cash, which is where investors reflexively go when they see a market rout.

Lastly, right or wrong, gold stocks are perceived by some as riskier than your average IBM or GE. Further, few gold stocks pay dividends, and the ones that do only yield 1-2%. Some sellers might have stuck around if they were getting 8-10%.

So, is that it for gold stocks? Look at the reasons outlined above: where does it say investors sold because inflation is dead? Where does it say the public left because the government has promised not to print money to solve their problems? Where does it indicate gold is no longer viewed as a safe haven? Has mankind lost interest in war? Does the dollar's recent rise mean its ills have been cured? Banks are fine? The economy has a bright future?

The bottom line: the base case for gold stocks remains intact, because at some point the public will see them as the place to go for profit. Gold will rise, and regardless of what the general market is doing at the time, gold stocks will separate and follow gold up. The best days for gold stocks still lie ahead, because a much higher gold price is assured by all the recent efforts to stave off a recession. Since gold stocks were pulled down by a general market panic and for reasons unrelated to fundamentals, our advice is to hold on. We're confident their day will come. And we'll sell when the problems that have yet to push gold to new inflation-adjusted highs have all played out. In the meantime, we need to be steady while others are fearful.

From the back of the room, a hand shot up. Judge Market, already resolved that this was to be no ordinary proceedings, looked over his glasses at the owner of the hand.

"Yes? And who are you? And why are you interrupting?"

"Louis James, senior editor of the International Speculator," the mysterious stranger spoke up loudly for the courtroom to hear. "I would like to add a historical fact related to gold stocks in a crisis."

"Mr. Cuomo, any objection?"

In reply, Son-of-Cuomo simply shrugged and dropped into his seat.

"Go ahead, Mr. James," Judge Market said, rocking back in his chair, his eyes attentive.

Approaching the witness stand, James turned to the assemblage and proceeded.

Homestake Mining Company (now part of mining giant Barrick Gold, NYSE.ABX) offers a worthwhile illustration of the potential of gold stocks even during depressions. As a bit of a background, for more than 100 years, the company operated the Homestake mine in South Dakota. For you television fans, you may recognize the Homestake as being a centerpiece in the recent HBO series Deadwood.

In any event, in 1935, right in the middle of the Great Depression, Homestake recovered enough gold to make $11.39 million in net income, a record that stood for nearly 40 years – and that was at a time when the U.S. government had set the price of gold at $35 per ounce. Homestake shares showed some volatility but weathered the great stock market crash of 1929, ending the year slightly up. From 1926 to the end of 1935, they went ten-to-one, soaring from $50 to $500.

With fluctuations as you'd expect, they held on to those gains until taking off again during the 1970s bull market for gold. When you get home, you can learn more about it with some rather ugly but eye-opening charts available at this website: http://www.geocities.com/WallStreet/Exchange/9807/Charts/SP500/HomestakeHist.gif.

Cuomo rose to his Gucci-shod feet with a wicked look on his face. "Mr. James, since you are here, maybe you could tell the jury why it is that Mr. Gold's known associate, Junior Goldshares, has done even worse, almost consistently losing money for investors over the past year. Lots and lots of money! What can you possibly say in Junior's defense?"

"Sure, happy to oblige," said the ever-obliging Mr. James, then launched into the answer.

In hindsight, it would have been nice if we'd taken even more profits than we did in August of 2007 and gone to cash – and now had that capital available to back up the truck for today's screaming buys. But the economic house of cards, which appears to finally be coming apart, could have done so last fall. At the time, cashing in on base metal plays, which can be expected to suffer with a slowing economy, and holding on to precious metals plays, for which the opposite is true, made perfect sense.

We would certainly go to cash rather than hold on to any conventional investment that has exposure to "toxic paper" or that can be expected to do poorly in a slowing economy.

But gold's day in the sun is coming soon, and we still believe the stocks give us leverage on that rising star. So, as stated in the most recent edition of the International Speculator, we're not selling anything unless we think the company doesn't have what it takes to make it through to the other side.

Of course, some investors might want to do some strategic tax loss selling, then look to buy back in the new year. The problem is that often times once you are out of the market, you can miss the big moves while waiting for the right moment to jump back in.

"Not much consolation for investors who have already lost money to Junior Goldshares while waiting for the big returns to materialize," sniffed Cuomo, looking meaningfully at the jury.

"No, it's not," James agreed. "No one likes to take an investment loss. But I have to say something here in Junior's defense. Namely, I have to remind folks of the speculator's credo, because no one's ever made a secret out of the fact that Goldshares are speculative in nature.

And that credo goes like this: "Speculators invest 10% in the hope of receiving a 100% return, while investors invest 100% in the hope of a 10% return."

In the International Speculator, a very apt name for the topic we cover, it has been our constant warning that investors should invest in Goldshares with no more than 20% of their portfolio. That's for the simple reason that while these stocks can offer big rewards – life-changing rewards, in fact – investors in the sector must be willing to accept big risks. Well, today, because of panic dumping, we are seeing the worse side of Goldshares.

Even so, for illustrative purposes, let's do the math on the losses that an investor who limited their investments to just 20% of their portfolio would have suffered with Goldshares. Assume, for example, that you lost 75% on the 20% of your portfolio that you allocated to the sector. In that case, your net loss on your overall portfolio would have been just 15%. Not fun, but not particularly bad, all things considered.

Conversely, take an investor who was 100% invested in the S&P 500 over the period mentioned by Jeff Clark earlier. In that case, they'd now be down almost 40%. Actually, looking at the market action today on my iPhone, the losses would be even worse than that.

"Now, hold on!" Mr. Cuomo sputtered. "All of this is good and well, but you can't all honestly be saying that you still think gold and even gold shares are still a good investment!"

Mr. Reason, stood again. "One more witness?"

"Oh, all right, but I want an answer to my question!" Cuomo barked, adding with a dramatic flourish, "The world wants an answer, nay, demands it!"

"Call your witness," Judge Market said, unimpressed.

"The defense calls David Galland, managing director of Casey Research.

A handsome, well-dressed man, his sublime intelligence palpable even from across the room, rose from the galley and approached the witness stand where Mr. Gold smiled happily at him.

"Okay, whoever you are, start talking," Cuomo said sharply. "You tell the jury how it is you could possibly be bullish about anything related to precious metals at this time. I mean, for gawd's sake, man, the global economy itself is collapsing. It is deflation that investors must be worried about. And yet, and yet... are you going to stand there and actually tell me you think investors should hold on to their precious metals investments? You are, I contend, either mad or deluded, or both at the same time!"

Unflustered by the bluster, Galland began to speak.

Economies and investment markets are complex systems, which is to say that predicting them with any certainty is an impossibility. Thus, my comments should not be taken to reflect certainty, but rather the best interpretation I can make of the situation as we see it.

For some years now, we have been warning that the house of cards, which has been built on a fiat monetary system, would come tumbling down.

It was because of the excess and the distortions that this system make inevitable that Doug Casey and others in the organization looked at the tea leaves and saw a Greater Depression, but one of an inflationary nature.

So, here we are, with the crisis upon us. There is no question that there is a massive deleveraging going on as individuals and corporations look to rebuild their stocks of ready money by dumping assets of all description. Real estate and equity markets are crashing as a result at the same time that U.S. Treasury instruments rise in value even though their yields are negative and falling. While buying into an instrument with a negative yield, at this point in time, many feel it is better to lose some money at a measured pace than take the sort of beatings being doled out in competing financial instruments.

Of course, as U.S. Treasuries are denominated in dollars, the inflow into those instruments has helped strengthen the dollar, putting pressure on gold and silver, which are, per Terry Coxon above, viewed as a competitive form of money. You can see that correlation in the chart here that Bud Conrad, who couldn't make it today because he is preparing for a trip to New Zealand, sent over.

The panicked reaction of investors in all sectors is understandable. The crisis we are now witnessing is not just of a once-in-a-generation scale, but once in a century. And so the scramble for safe harbors and cash is perfectly understandable. It's why Treasuries are so popular, and it's why gold has largely held its own in the broader scheme of things.

"Do you have a point to make?" Cuomo sneered from his seat.

Galland nonchalantly replied:

I was merely setting the stage for where we are at this point in history. And by that I mean, here and now, October 24, 2008. You see, when panic and confusion are the watchwords of the day, as they now are, there are two attributes of the successful investor that become especially important. The first is to stay calm. The second is to try to look beyond the immediate.

Many investors have, like the participants in the Charge of the Light Brigade – the anniversary of which, by the way, is tomorrow, October 25 -- have misread the signals and rushed straight into the cannons of the bear market, being wiped out in the process. Or, in their rush for the rear, they have dumped everything indiscriminately, suffering unnecessarily big losses on great investments.

Will the market continue to rig for deflation for the immediate future? Absolutely. And for the next little while, we can expect nothing other than bad economic news. Therefore, caution in all things financial is called for. Of course, if you have a good reserve of cash, then you could take positions in the inverse stock market ETFs and short positions on banks, financials, and real estate plays recommended in The Casey Report. But in a market as uncertain as this, such positions should be approached carefully, because of the increasing presence of governments in the markets.

Specifically, with each passing day, the risk increases of market-distorting government interventions, including short-sale bans, trading halts, direct interventions in individual stocks, increased margins on targeted commodities, etc. That greatly increases the risk for short-sellers.

"Are we going to get back to the topic of Mr. Gold et al. at some point? I have a hair appointment at 2:00 pm," Cuomo said, looking down for his reflection on the highly polished top of the table in front of him.

"Yes. Right away," said Galland.

You see, most of our recommended investments are not short-term in nature, but rather look for big trends that you can invest in when they are deeply out of favor. Our base case about the nature of the crisis, and especially the government's reaction to it, has not changed. In fact, if a year ago, you had asked us to estimate the amount of money the governments of the world would unleash in an attempt to head off an economic downturn, none of us, not even Doug Casey, our resident guru now wandering the highlands of Argentina, would have come remotely close to estimating the actual numbers being deployed.

To put some meat on that point, over the last month and a little bit, the monetary base of the United States has increased by a previously unimaginable and unprecedented 20%.

And our own Bud Conrad now estimates next year's U.S. government deficit at better than 10% of GNP, an also unprecedented number. And that doesn't even factor in the impact on the deficit from the fall-off in tax revenues that is inevitable given the likely depth of the downturn.

And it gets worse than that, because if you step back just a bit, you'll realize that, while financial markets have been devastated, the damage to the real economy is just now getting started.

Which is to say that the scope of the government's monetary exertions to "fix" everything are only beginning to ramp up. The Democrats, who look likely to control the whole shebang in Washington, are already calling for yet more stimulus and expensive intervention, including, this week, a call for the government to guarantee the nation's defaulting mortgages. Given that 265,968 mortgages went into foreclosure in September alone, this potential bit of largess is unlikely to come cheap.

"Has anyone ever told you that you're long winded," Cuomo asked.

"Yes, they have. It is a personal problem I struggle with every day.

Be that as it may, investors today have several choices, or some combination thereof, they need to make in face of the economic crisis.

They can choose to try and time this market over the short term, but if they do, they better use some very tight controls and pay a lot of attention, because literally anything can happen.

They could also choose to sell everything, take the tax losses, and sit in cash until that point when the inflation we see as inevitable makes the cost of holding that cash too expensive.

Or they can set aside enough cash to assure that their quality of life is not at risk in a collapsing economy and cautiously begin searching out the extraordinary values to be had in gold and other inflation hedges. There is no rush, but one would want to be positioned ahead of the big demand for these inflation hedges we see coming when the wall of government money begins to hit the economy next year.

As Doug Casey recently put it, and as the ghost of Rothbard seconded above, gold's highest and best use is as money, and sometimes it can also be a terrific investment. With the caveat that the near-term deflationary pressures will continue to periodically whip up headwinds for gold and other inflation hedges, we think that Mr. Gold, Ms. Silver, and the resource share clan are screamingly good investments. Personally, I am content with my resource holdings and am holding tight.

"Mr. Cuomo, do you have any further questions or comments before I pass judgment?" Judge Market asked.

"Only that I think these gold bugs are lunatics because everyone, but everyone now thinks that we are going into a deep deflation," Mr. Cuomo said dismissively. "I rest my case."

"Yes, that is so," Galland responded. "But, sooner than most people expect, we think that everyone, but everyone will begin to believe that it is a historic level of inflation they need to most worry about. At that point, Mr. Gold and all his friends will be waiting for them."

"Mr. Reason, do you have any closing comments?"

"No, sir."

"Then would the defendants rise," the judge intoned.

"In light of the evidence presented here today, and because a sound judgment in this case involves the passage of time, I'm going to postpone judgment on this case, and release the defendants with the stipulation that they report back here in six months. At that time, we will update our arguments and Mr. Gold, you and your friends had better have made amends by that time, or else. Do you understand?"

"Not really," Mr. Gold said brightly, "but I'll be back."

Funeral for an Economy

Years ago, I was asked to be one of six pallbearers for an elderly in-law in Montreal, the first time I had ever been asked to perform that somber service.

On the appointed day and hour, the pallbearers -- which included, I addition to myself, four elderly contemporaries of the departed as well as the deceased's younger son, who was of a similar age to my own -- assembled at the foot of the fifty or so stairs leading up into the imposing church to wait for the hearse. As befitted the occasion, we were all dressed in our best suits and spoke quietly among ourselves.

With the crowd assembled inside, the transport arrived and two burly attendants opened the door of the long, black vehicle and slid the large casket out on a purpose-built gurney. I can recall one of the attendants looking at the many steps leading to the church, and then back at the six of us pallbearers, and making a concerned face. He then instructed us on the technique involved in carrying a casket, watched as we positioned ourselves, and said a helpful "One, two, three, lift," which we did.

As the attendant slipped the gurney back into the hearse, leaving the six of us holding the large box carrying our dear friend and relative in mid-air, a shock went first through my body, and then my mind. The casket was too heavy!

It literally felt like someone had asked me to carry a pallet of bricks. But there I was, dressed in my finest, struggling to hold on to the front left rail of the elegant casket, looking with a silent whimper at the fifty steps.

In any other circumstance, I would have let go of the weight with a loud yowl, followed by a stream of obscenities at whomever it was that had played such a bad joke on me. That, as you can imagine, was not possible given the circumstances.

And so, surprising even myself at the inner strength I was able to muster, I lifted my foot onto the first step and hauled my burden unsteadily up the narrow stairs, not evoking in my mind's eye the toils suffered by the everyday Egyptian pyramid slave.

The process was repeated, painfully, step after step, sweat now pouring out of every one of my pores. In my cranium, red claxon horns blaring, simultaneously warning me that I was either going to split a gut or drop the remains of my dear friend and in-law onto the steep steps... after which, as sure as night follows day, the conveyance would begin a quick and dangerous backwards slide down the steps to an unhappy conclusion.

It was then that my straining brain remembered my fellow pallbearers, the dear departed's old friends. If I, a young man in the prime years of life, was almost done for, how could the poor old gentlemen possibly be bearing up? Oh, the tragedy, the human emotion that poured forth from me as I thought of how they must be suffering, and so I risked a concerned backward glance.

Only to see to my everlasting shock, that each was as unshaken as they had been thirty steps below, their elegant suits unruffled, their brows as dry as a freshly powdered infant. Except one, the young son of the deceased, who had been assigned the position on the rails at the far right rear of the troupe. His face was red as a beet, his face as wet as if in a shower, his eyes bulging and the veins on his temples writhing like snakes. In short, his countenance mirrored my own.

At first my brain could make no sense of the scene, but then I noticed that the four elder gentlemen, their faces somber but relaxed, were not in any definition of the word actually "lifting" anything, but rather had their hands resting lightly, daintily even, on the same rails that the two youngest members of the party were clutching as if for life itself.

Somehow, and to this day I still can't imagine how, we made it to the top of the stairs and into the church and then back down again an hour later, but I distinctly remember laughing out loud at the memory that evening when stretched out on a couch, exhausted to my core. And I laugh at it now, the memory of those elegant gentlemen going through the pretense of labor while the able-bodied carried all the weight.

So, why do I relate that scene today?

It is because it strikes me as a good metaphor to the potential of what may come to pass in the years just ahead as the government looks to pay for its many programs by raising taxes on the most productive of society.

While the Obamites, for instance, talk about modest tax increases on the rich, they fail to add into their calculations the impact of letting the Bush tax reductions expire. That one act alone will, over time, add the weight of hundreds of billions, trillions even, in taxes to the backs of the successful. And it will see a return of the estate tax, a tax that I find personally repugnant, given that the money it takes will have made it through the many tax harvestings I will have put up with throughout my career, making it to the finishing line only to have the state confiscate some large percentage of it rather than having it go to my far more deserving heirs.

And I suspect, politicking concluded, once the extent of next year's deficits is apparent, all promises about keeping taxes down will be swept aside for the hot air they are.

But with each new tax passed, the government increases the risk that the casket will be dropped.

How Long Will the Foreigners Support the Dollar?

With a U.S. government deficit in excess of $1 trillion next year, how long will foreigners be willing to invest in government T-bills and the like? Not overly long, we suspect. A suspicion heightened by the following item off the wires this week...

BEIJING (Dow Jones)--China should be very cautious in using its massive foreign exchange reserves to purchase foreign financial institutions, a senior Chinese official said Sunday.

Zheng Xinli, vice director of the China Communist Party's Central Policy Research Office, said at a forum that China should instead use its foreign exchange reserves to buy foreign resource companies, oil fields, and iron ore, copper and aluminum mines in foreign countries to meet China's demand for the resources.

China's foreign exchange reserves are the world's largest and last stood at $1.9 trillion at the end of September.

Zheng said the global financial crisis gives China a chance to internationalize the yuan.

He urged China to accelerate the pace of the yuan's convertibility reform, in an attempt to allow the Chinese currency to play a key role in the region.

On the topic of China, there was also this, this week... another of many signs that the Chinese remained focused on their future economic needs and are not afraid to act to take advantage of the current financial chaos to buy what they need on the cheap...

(Dow Jones)--China Development Bank may raise the small stake it holds in global mining giant Anglo American PLC (AAL.LN) as the value of the miner's shares has been falling on a worsening economic outlook, the South China Morning Post reported Monday, citing unnamed sources.

"CDB has a stake in Anglo American and it is actively looking at options for that stake," said one source.

"Alternatively, since it sees itself as a bridge between Anglo American and China, it could bring in other parties to take a stake," the source said.

The report didn't say how much China Development Bank owns in Anglo American, but said the bank "evidently" lent US$805 million to Chinese tycoon Larry Yung to fund his purchase of a 1.13% stake in Anglo American in 2006.

Anglo American spokesman James Wyatt-Tilby said in the report the terms of the financing placed ultimate ownership of the stake with CDB.

Credit Sucks and Don't Forget It

Friend and correspondent Sunni forwarded this in, this week.

On average, Americans have eight credit cards apiece and 20 percent of those cards are maxed out, reports CardWeb.com, which tracks the lending industry.

Americans now hold more than $850 billion in credit card debt, four times as much as in 1990. About 58 percent of cardholders do not pay down the entire balance each month. That group carries an average card debt of more than $17,000, according to the Consumer Federation of America."

This week, American Express announced that in the third quarter, they had suffered a 59 percent year-over-year decrease in net income from their credit card division.

This is yet another area in the economy we see getting much worse before it gets better.

Laughing Out Loud (When No One Else Is Looking)

Having received a nice response from you all after last week's humor installment, and having received an influx of new entries, I thought I'd repeat the exercise this week again.

This week's entry comes from friend Beth G... a revised definition of financial terms.

CEO - Chief Embezzlement Officer

CFO - Corporate Fraud Officer

BULL MARKET - A random market movement causing an investor to mistake himself for a financial genius.

BEAR MARKET - A 6- to 18-month period when the kids get no allowance, the wife gets no jewelry, and the husband gets no sex.

VALUE INVESTING - The art of buying low and selling lower.

P/E RATIO - The percentage of investors wetting their pants as the market keeps crashing.

BROKER - What my broker has made me.

STANDARD AND POOR – Your life in a nutshell

STOCK ANALYST - The idiot that just downgraded your stock.

STOCK SPLIT - When your ex and their lawyer split your assets equally between themselves.

FINANCIAL PLANNER - A guy whose phone has been disconnected.

MARKET CORRECTION - The day after you buy stocks.

CASH FLOW - The movement your money makes as it disappears down the toilet.

YAHOO - What you yell after selling it to some poor sucker for $240.00 a share.

WINDOWS - What you jump out of when you're the sucker who bought Yahoo at $240.00 a share.

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR – Past-year investor who's now locked up in a nuthouse.

PROFIT – An archaic word no longer in use.

Miscellany

I am running really, really late today... so I will sign off right after mentioning that Alex in Calgary, who technically sponsored the first phyle in his coffee shop, would like to organize an ongoing group. If you are interested, contact phyle@caseyresearch.com.

As I sign off, accompanied by Tchaikovsky's 1812 Overture (the song aficionados of the movie "V" will recall this from the pivotal scene), I see the DJIA is off over 400 points, and gold has pulled back from the abyss and is now trading at $730.

Frantic, exciting, challenging, and sometimes tiring times we live in.

Hang in there... until next week, thank you for reading and for subscribing...

Best Regards,

David Galland
Managing Director

The Room - 09/26/2008

David Galland — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:34:16 GMT

September 26, 2008

Dear Readers,

What a world I have returned to from my cloistered retreat at the beautiful Vivenda Miranda, scenically situated on a cliff outside of the quaint port town of Lagos, Portugal.

Everything has changed.

Everything is changing.

The storm we have so long tried to help you prepare for is upon us. At this point, I can only hope you have your sails rigged for the storm now breaking, because time is running out.

The violent volatility I warned of when last I wrote has arrived, with towering waves now rising up and smashing into the economy - and as an unavoidable consequence, our personal portfolios -- from all sides.

Overnight the holders of my mortgage, WaMu, failed, the largest bank failure in history. This week, the golf course that I usually play on was taken over by the government... last week it belonged to AIG.

As you don't need me to tell you, that same government now wants to spend over a trillion dollars to bail out Wall Street and to shore up the money market mutual funds - which have so far flown under the radar screen despite portfolios stuffed to the brim with bad paper.

While no one was paying attention, U.S. automakers used their election year leverage to win approval for $25 billion in low-interest loans.

As you can see in the chart shown here, the monetary base of the U.S. has surged, a topic we'll have more on in The Casey Report, which will be released next week. Even before the bailout, the government has begun doing what it knows best... pumping up the money supply in a desperate attempt to save the economy from the crash it so desperately needs.

According to Reuters, last week the Fed lent nearly $188 billion per day, on average, to banks and money managers.

Last week, as this fiscal prolificacy was underway, gold surged as we expected it to. This week, it has consolidated, holding its gains but not pushing higher yet.

We don't care.

Owning gold right now is the right thing to do, on multiple levels. Others are now quickly coming to that same understanding. This week, I have had two calls from people I haven't heard from in years, asking me how to buy gold. And then there's this...

From a correspondent in Switzerland...

So, we call Bank Cantonale Bern. The Cantonale Banks are like BofA in the States - it's a huge retail banking company with branches in most towns. We learn, yes, they have limited bullion for gold but no silver.

The surprise came when we arrived at the bank this afternoon. The bank has a teller window, segregated off to the side of the others, with a sign above the window that read,

"Change & Gold" (foreign currency and gold coins)

We had to wait in line. I bought the last of the one-ounce bullion they had - Krugerands. And there were people behind us in line. The woman who helped us said that the demand for gold has been so strong that they made it available via front-line employees, rather than through a bank representative in a private, "behind the counter" transaction. And they haven't had silver for several weeks. She said supplies of silver had been sporadic at certain branches in Zurich.

So there you have it. A retail bank where you can conduct business in gold just as easy as Swiss francs. A developing trend? One can only hope.

Just a few minutes ago, my dear friend Mr. Watson, whose birthday it was I went to help celebrate in Portugal, tipped me to this... from the Toronto Star.

Coin dealers from the U.S. to Canada have reported a surge in buying of bullion coins and other gold products as troubles in the financial markets prompt people to seek a safe haven in precious metals.

"Demand has exceeded supply for American buffalo 24-karat gold one-ounce bullion coins, and our inventories have been depleted," the mint said in a note to its dealers. "We are, therefore, temporarily suspending sales of these coins."

The trading herd will follow the physical buyers. The recent $100 surge was just a precursor. The lag in understanding - and action - is understandable. The global economy is in a true paradigm shift. People don't want to believe what their eyes and ears are telling them. And so, at this point the trading herd is standing en masse, eyes wide open, nostrils flaring, muscles twitching spastically, waiting for the news that will tell them which way to bolt for safety.

While they are only to be used by the attentive, and with great caution, I am now using a variety of options and futures strategies to leverage what's coming. I will never risk so much as to put myself in any real financial trouble. But, with that filter, I am now positioning myself for higher gold prices and a falling stock market (I suspect one more dead-cat bounce after the bailout is passed... then watch out below).

Higher interest rates are a sure thing, but there will likely be a lag between now and then as well. Structure things right, and you can ride through any possible downturn, then earn extraordinary returns as things move in your favor. But the key thing to remember is that, like hot chili sauce, a little leverage goes a long way... and a lot of leverage can burn you, badly.

Knowing where your money is has also become very important. In the upcoming edition of The Casey Report, we'll also be presenting a detailed explanation of how to be sure your bank will be one of those still standing after the storm.

Ed. Note

The Casey Report

Try our 3-month no-risk trial now.

Whatever the final form of the bailout, and I am convinced there will be one - the money may not flow in exactly the way that Wall Street wants, but it will flow nonetheless -- in the medium to long term, the die is cast. The hegemony of the U.S. dollar in international trade is coming to an end (more on that momentarily). Given the lack of a tangible alternative, namely one that is not solely faith based, a new currency regime will arise. It's impossible to gauge from this distance what it will ultimately look like, or who will sponsor it (there is talk of the IMF fulfilling the role), but it's safe to assume it will have to include gold and other tangibles.

We live in dangerous, yet exciting, times. We'll continue doing our part to keep you in the know, and on the right side of things.

Moving along, I want to share a front-seat analysis on this week's congressional hearings on the bailout from Donald Grove, our new Washington correspondent.

The Bailout: Behind the Scenes

By Donald Grove

I went to hear Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke testify this morning before the Joint Economic Committee (Chairman Chuck Schumer, D-NY), primarily on the Bush administration's capital markets intervention proposal. I thought I would pass on my observations, which will probably be different than what you read in the mainstream press. Bernanke has had it rough lately. He was testifying yesterday with Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and SEC Chairman Chris Cox before the Senate Banking Committee (Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn) and was scheduled to testify with Paulson later this afternoon before the House Financial Services Committee (Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass).

Schumer recalled that Bernanke last appeared before the Joint Economic Committee in April, following the narrowly averted collapse of Bear Stearns. He said "Most of us thought we had just witnessed an event that we were likely never to see again in our lifetimes. And yet, here we are, only six months later, and we are discussing a crisis many orders of magnitude greater." Schumer stated, as did others, that "we must act and we must act soon." Those statements were not without reservations, however, and I would add that not acting may be the more prudent course. There seems to be a compulsion on the Hill to do something, even if it's wrong. I guess that's what legislators think their constituents expect - and maybe they do. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg told NBC's "Meet the Press" that "nobody knows exactly what they should do, but anything is better than nothing." Not necessarily so - in fact, probably not so. "Expecting Congress to fix the current financial crisis is like expecting an arsonist to put out the fire he started," said Representative John Shadegg (R-Az).

Schumer told Bernanke that "Americans are furious" and that he and probably each of his colleagues have heard "amazement, astonishment, and intense anger" from constituents. No doubt, but why? According to Schumer, "over the last eight years, we were told that markets knew best, that financial alchemy had reduced risk to an afterthought, and that we were entering a new world of global growth and prosperity. Instead, what we have learned is that we now have to pay for the greed and recklessness of those who should have known better." Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. I personally recall hearing Schumer in a hearing on the Hill within the last eight years demanding that the less fortunate be given access to home mortgages so they, too, could realize the American dream. He was not alone. The former Fed chairman urged Americans to avail themselves of adjustable-rate mortgages. As was often noted during today's hearing, there is plenty of blame to go around. What worried me was the tendency to lay blame for this debacle on the free market.

As I noted above, I think doing nothing may be the best thing Congress can do right now. In fact, if Congress had done nothing in the past, we might have avoided a lot of these problems. It's never too late to stop meddling. Why not start right now? Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) suggested that we just let the free-market system correct itself. Of course the Fed chairman did not agree. He told Sen. John Sununu (R-NH) that we need to figure out what the price should be on complex securities so that private capital can come in and help buy them up so that banks can reestablish capital to make loans. Ron Paul, in prime form, said that most illiquid assets are illiquid because they are not worth anything. He added that price fixing prolonged the Great Depression, and that is what is being proposed now. He said that messing with prices risks socialism. Paul said the Fed is not smart enough to fix prices. Hear! Hear! Nor, I would add, is the Treasury Secretary or Congress. The free market, however, is uniquely able by its very nature to set prices just right, including, by the way, interest rates - the price of money.

Congressman Paul asked where this $700 billion will come from. Not from taxes or borrowing from China. He said it will come from us, presumably through the insidious tax of inflation. He explained that the downturn in housing is because housing is overpriced. Let housing prices come down, he said. He said, "We can't solve inflation with more inflation." Paul asked the Fed chairman where his authority comes from and noted that only 15% of Americans care about the Constitution or the rule of law - and less than that in Washington, D.C.

Bernanke conceded that price fixing was counterproductive but insisted that we have to somehow "discover" what prices are. Duhhh! That's what the free market is for! As to his authority, he cited the Federal Reserve Act ..... "now if you disagree with the Act...." Well, I do disagree, and I think Ron Paul also believes that the creation of the central bank in 1913 was where a lot of this trouble started. Nevertheless, I don't think the Fed has even been complying with the mandate and constraints of the Act.

Refreshingly, retiring Senator Jim Saxton, ranking member on the Committee (R-NJ), noted that it would be nice if we could go to a safe at Treasury and take out about 5% of GDP to bail out financial institutions, but we can't. We have to borrow it, he said (albeit probably surreptitiously from our unborn progeny). I am always heartened to see that someone on the Hill realizes that. Unfortunately, I suspect that a majority of Americans do vaguely suppose that there is something like a big safe with real money in it that the government taps to pay for things like this - kind of like believing that the Social Security Trust Fund is bundles of hundred-dollar bills stacked up in a cool, dry place.

Vice Chairman Carolyn Maloney (R-NY) asked if this proposal to intervene in the credit markets to the tune of $700 B would affect inflation and wondered if the Fed might have to raise rates. Bernanke said that this was not a stimulus. He said that if it helps the economy grow, the Fed may have to raise rates sooner, but the he did not expect it to have any effect on inflation. I'm speechless! Of course it's inflationary. I also have to wonder whenever I hear a comment like this, whether he actually believes that an expanding economy causes inflation - like some mysterious act of God - and that it is the Fed's role to counter that by raising rates.

He explained that this would not be an expenditure. He said it would be "acquisition of assets." If there is a loss, he said, it would be much less than $700 B. I think I agree with Ron Paul. We are basically trying to pretend that the real estate bubble never popped by saying that the debt instruments based on those inflated values still have value. Several legislators expressed their frustration over the fact that Hank Paulson added other toxic waste to the mix this weekend - car loans, student loans.

Congress is trying to add its own unique signature to this boondoggle. For example, there is talk of coming up with the money by placing a surcharge on those making over a certain amount per year (I think $1M). There is also a move to restrict the compensation of financial institution executives. Amy Klubuchar (D-MN), said, "There should be a limit on what you can make when taking our money." Bernanke said there has to be an incentive for risk taking. "For this to work," he said, "we need a wide range of participation. If we stigmatize institutions that participate, they won't participate." Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) suggested a $200 B tranche with Warren Buffett at the head of the board of some administering organization to "get these institutions functioning again." Bernanke noted that Buffett had invested $5 B in Goldman Sachs and that the Oracle of Omaha had said that we "go over the precipice if Congress does not act."

There was also a bright side to proposals from legislators. Kevin Brady suggested that Congress look at a holiday on the capital gains tax or temporarily lowering repatriation road blocks since taxes now make it too expensive to bring capital home from overseas. He noted that three years ago, $300 B came home when the tax barriers were lowered. Bernanke said these actions alone will not solve the problem. Again, I am not holding my breath - more likely that we will see exchange controls.

Representative Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) noted that although Bernanke says he will be "acquiring assets," he has asked Congress to raise the debt limit to do it and is acquiring the assets because they are toxic waste and we don't know what they're worth. "In Texas," he said, "we say ‘those chickens are coming home to roost.'" Then he thought better of it and said "vultures are coming home to roost." He said we have a bankrupt ideology. I'm not holding my breath waiting for taxpayers to get their $700 B back. Ron Paul later said that after Doggett's comments, he can't tell who the conservatives are.

As is often the case in exchanges with the Fed chairman, there was an emphasis on market psychology, not real sound money practices. The whole concern seems to be for creating the illusion of economic stability as if stability could not actually be achieved, so the illusion is the best we can do. For example, Schumer asked whether a $150 billion installment, with the rest to come later, wouldn't be enough to assure markets that Congress is serious. Bernanke agreed that it is about psychology and said $700 B is what the administration thought it would take to provide psychological reassurance. Representative Carolyn Maloney asked where he got that figure. He said it was not science. It's about 5% of the $14 trillion in outstanding residential and commercial mortgages, on which the loss rate is about 5 %. I couldn't help thinking that returning to the gold standard would certainly show the market that Congress was serious and would allow real financial planning instead of trying to guess at the unintended consequences of clumsy government intervention in the free market.

There was a lot of discussion of the technical aspects of getting banks lending again - putting taxpayers first, strong congressional oversight, enticing financial institutions, including foreign institutions, to participate in the auction of these troubled securities, fire sale vs. hold-to-maturity prices, the Fed paying a premium for them. Senator John Sununu asked if firms would be willing to sell at below book value. Bernanke said (apparently now agreeing with Ron Paul) that "over time there is no way to hide the real value of an asset." I think that was a "yes," but I found myself wondering whether the objective here isn't to pay above-market value for these securities with taxpayer's money. I think it is.

Bernanke said this is the most significant post-war economic crisis for the United States and the world. He noted the hardships for those on Main Street if banks can't lend - consumer credit dries up, car and small business loans are unavailable. Baron Hill (D-IN) asked Bernanke what he should tell his constituents who asked if their stock portfolios and 401(k)s were going to lose value. Bernanke said "yes," they would lose value if Congress does not act. He said the credit system is like plumbing that permeates the economy. He said choking credit takes the life blood out of the economy. That may be, but perhaps it should not be. It occurred to me that there are two components to interest: opportunity cost and risk of lost purchasing power. If you take away the latter, I think the credit system becomes quite simple and we don't have to go through all these contortions, and probably don't need the Federal Reserve. Inconveniently, the government would have to live within its means like the rest of us.

Bernanke said the pain on Main Street would be very significant if Congress does not authorize this plan. He urged Congress to solve this problem now and come back later and look at reforming regulation. As Representative John Shadegg said, however, you can't expect an arsonist to put out the fire he started. There is no way we are going to avoid pain at this point. It seems to me that each time Congress tries to avoid it, the inevitable pain gets worse. Let's bite the bullet and get it over with and for God's sake, no more regulation!

Jim DeMint (R-SC) said that unbridled capitalism is not at fault. He said this problem was caused by the government and its implied guarantee. He said we removed accountability for risk from the enterprise system and that this was a failure of government intervention, not a failure of the free market. Bernanke tried to clarify that he was not talking about heavier regulation, just reformed, smarter regulation - maybe even less regulation. I'm afraid I have evolved from a libertarian into an anarchist and find not the slightest comfort in those words. I was happy to hear DeMint point out that some of the institutions that Bernanke found too big to fail were government-created GSEs. He said that none of these programs support free-market activity. He noted that the Sarbanes-Oxley "monster" chased capital off shore but failed to tell us about Bear Stearns. He concluded that "no amount of government regulation will eliminate corruption if risk is removed." Bravo!

Rep. Phil English (R-PA) was troubled by the extraordinary power this proposal would give to the Treasury Secretary, an unelected official. He suggested that this was the path to "Crony Capitalism." I will add that the next Treasury Secretary will inherit this power and will not only be unelected, he or she has not even been named.

Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) observed that Bernanke and Paulson went to the White House with this problem last Thursday but had to have known about it before that. He wondered why Congress had been kept in the dark. Bernanke cited efforts taken to correct the problem, including the discount window, CDSs, and the market's natural healing process. Hinchey said he was skeptical in April when Bernanke and Paulson told the Committee that the economy was growing and that our financial institutions were healthy. He said there was motivation to keep this under cover and that we are seeing manipulations and distortions of the mortgage market. Bernanke cited the sharp interest rate cuts in January. Apparently he was still hopeful that they would work in April and did not want to alarm the Committee. He suggested that Congress "should look at substantial regulatory reform." He suggested a "1-2 punch. Stabilize and then fix it so it does not happen again." Again, I say that fixing it will take more than adjusting a few dials or fine tuning some regulations. The overhaul necessary to fix this I suspect no one on the Hill has the guts for except Ron Paul, maybe Tom Coburn.

In conclusion, I would say it sounds like this bailout may not be a done deal. Constituents are ringing phones off the hook, telling their legislators "don't do it." Many are suspicious that it came up so quickly and that they are being asked to act so quickly. Representative Mike Pence (R-IN) told CNN, "There are those in the public debate who have said that we must act now. The last time I heard that, I was on a used-car lot. The truth is, every time somebody tells you that you've got to do the deal right now, it usually means they're going to get the better part of the deal."

Always the optimist.

Regards, Don

More Views on the Bailout From the Washington Post...

During testimony before the House Budget Committee, Peter R. Orszag -- Congress's top bookkeeper -- said the bailout could expose the way companies are stowing toxic assets on their books, leading to greater problems.

"Ironically, the intervention could even trigger additional failures of large institutions, because some institutions may be carrying troubled assets on their books at inflated values," Orszag said in his testimony. "Establishing clearer prices might reveal those institutions to be insolvent."

In an interview later yesterday, Orszag explained using the following example: Suppose a company has Asset X, whose value is recorded on the books as $100. Because of the current economic decline, Asset X's real value has dropped to $50. If the company takes part in the government bailout and sells Asset X for $50, the company has to report a $50 loss on its books. On a scale of millions of dollars, such write-downs could ruin a company.

Such companies "look solvent today only because it's kind of hidden," Orszag said. "They actually are insolvent" already, he said.

From Ron Paul...

Dear Friends,

Whenever a Great Bipartisan Consensus is announced, and a compliant media assures everyone that the wondrous actions of our wise leaders are being taken for our own good, you can know with absolute certainty that disaster is about to strike.

The events of the past week are no exception.

The bailout package that is about to be rammed down Congress' throat is not just economically foolish. It is downright sinister. It makes a mockery of our Constitution, which our leaders should never again bother pretending is still in effect. It promises the American people a never-ending nightmare of ever-greater debt liabilities they will have to shoulder. Two weeks ago, financial analyst Jim Rogers said the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made America more communist than China! "This is welfare for the rich," he said. "This is socialism for the rich. It's bailing out the financiers, the banks, the Wall Streeters."

That describes the current bailout package to a T. And we're being told it's unavoidable.

The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences - predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics - are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!

The Treasury Secretary is authorized to purchase up to $700 billion in mortgage-related assets at any one time. That means $700 billion is only the very beginning of what will hit us.
Financial institutions are "designated as financial agents of the Government." This is the New Deal to end all New Deals.
Then there's this: "Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency." Translation: the Secretary can buy up whatever junk debt he wants to, burden the American people with it, and be subject to no one in the process.

There goes your country.

Even some so-called free-market economists are calling all this "sadly necessary." Sad, yes. Necessary? Don't make me laugh.

Our one-party system is complicit in yet another crime against the American people. The two major party candidates for president themselves initially indicated their strong support for bailouts of this kind - another example of the big choice we're supposedly presented with this November: yes or yes. Now, with a backlash brewing, they're not quite sure what their views are. A sad display, really.

Although the present bailout package is almost certainly not the end of the political atrocities we'll witness in connection with the crisis, time is short. Congress may vote as soon as tomorrow. With a Rasmussen poll finding support for the bailout at an anemic seven percent, some members of Congress are afraid to vote for it. Call them! Let them hear from you! Tell them you will never vote for anyone who supports this atrocity.

The issue boils down to this: do we care about freedom? Do we care about responsibility and accountability? Do we care that our government and media have been bought and paid for? Do we care that average Americans are about to be looted in order to subsidize the fattest of cats on Wall Street and in government? Do we care?

When the chips are down, will we stand up and fight, even if it means standing up against every stripe of fashionable opinion in politics and the media?

Times like these have a way of telling us what kind of a people we are, and what kind of country we shall be.

In liberty,

Ron Paul

Quotes from the Quislings

Not to be indelicate, but the working title I had chosen for this next section was "FCUK YOU!"... that, by virtue of my feeling that strong words are in order for the quislings who purport to be free marketers and who have been lined up to support the government's bailout.

Here's my Rogues List...

Laurence Fink

BlackRock Inc

"If this plan works, taxpayers are not going to be out money," Fink, a pioneer of mortgage-backed securities, said in an interview with Bloomberg TV.

... Based on current prices, buyers of distressed debt, including the government, will earn "strong returns over the next five to seven years," said Fink, who declined to say whether his New York-based company will bid on contracts to manage the proposed Treasury fund.

And there's the well-regarded Mr. Buffett...

"I am betting on the Congress doing the right thing for the American public and passing this bill," Buffett said on cable channel CNBC today. "I certainly have a vote of confidence in Goldman and vote of confidence in Congress."

Of course, Buffett didn't mention how much money his company stood to lose if the government failed to rush into the breach. Or how much extra money he'd make by trading his good name to Goldman for a sweetheart deal that will form a footnote in all future books on financial topics... but only if the bailout goes through. Among other kisses, Buffett's coup includes perpetual preferred shares that pay a 10% coupon. Simply, that means if the U.S.G. bails out Goldman, Buffett will collect $500 million a year on his $5 billion investment, and his payments will come before those sent to any other shareholders. He also gets under-the-market warrants on another $5 billion worth of shares.

Goldman never would have agreed to this deal unless their feet were roasting in the coals of calamity. One can hardly blame Buffett for making his move (it's not like he couldn't withstand the loss of $5 billion, should the worst come to pass), but now that he is so handsomely positioned, his cheerleading should be viewed as the disingenuous self-dealing that it is.

And then there's this, from the Washington Post, quoting mega-bond manager Bill Gross...

"The Treasury proposal will not be a bailout of Wall Street but a rescue of Main Street, as lending capacity and confidence is restored to our banks and the delicate balance between production and finance is given a chance to work its magic. Democratic Party earmarks mandating forbearance on home mortgage foreclosures will be critical as well. If this program is successful, however, it is obvious that the free market and Wild West capitalism of recent decades will be forever changed. Future economic textbooks are likely to teach that while capitalism is the most dynamic and productive system ever conceived, it is most efficient over the long term when there is another delicate balance -- between private incentive and government oversight."

On that last bit, I feel it's worth mentioning that Freddie and Fannie may have "enjoyed" more government oversight than any other two institutions on the planet.

If there is one certainty, and there are several related to this fiasco, it will be that the free market will be made the patsy, and the result will be a public outcry for more, not less government.

In the end, now that the government has broached the topic, the $700 billion is going to get spent... whether it starts by going into the pockets of the Wall Street, or is cycled back into the public pocket through the vehicle of FDIC guarantees, or making the money market funds whole, or giving millions of householders a free ride on their mortgages... or simply writing checks to consumers... it, and a lot more is going to get spent.

For my money, and it is my money (and yours), the best argument for the bailout was offered by none other than President Bush, who succinctly opined in a meeting yesterday of congressional leaders, "If money isn't loosened, this sucker could go down."

Unfortunately this sucker, aka the economy, is going down no matter what they do at this point.

At this point, all we can do is to wait and watch. Focus on liquidity for your personal portfolio and prepare for the worst. It's coming.

About Those Foreigners...

In all of the frenzy, the U.S. Government seems to be largely ignoring the foreign holders of our many trillions of dollars. This is also, as we have repeatedly said would be the case, because foreigners don't vote, and if they do decide to dump their dollars - as we expect they will (and actually are) - they will only hurt themselves. Or, so runs the logic of desperate policymakers, relying on MMAD (Monetary Mutual Assured Destruction) to rationalize their massive unleashing of dollars.

If you've voted for any of the clowns running our country for the last 40 or so years, you might want to take a moment to apologize to your children and, if you have them, your grandchildren as well. (Ron Paul supporters, you can take a pass on this.)

That's because, as I mentioned above, the U.S. Government has managed to squander the unbelievable advantage of being the suppliers of the world's de-facto reserve currency... an advantage made almost miraculous given that it was backed by nothing.

All the bureaucrats had to do was show even modest restraint and occasionally take a few moments to remind themselves of the principles of self-reliance and open opportunity that made this country what it is. Instead, the political class, cheered on by the voting public, fell in love with virtually every perfect-world social program, every new make work, corporate suck-up and pork barrel program waved in front of their snout-bedecked faces these many years. In the process, they have traded away something that no nation will again enjoy... a global blank check.

Bud Conrad is assembling the eye-opening hard data showing the trend reversal in foreign investment in U.S. dollar assets for the next edition of The Casey Report.

In the meantime, the anecdotal evidence is beginning to mount, an example being this item from MarketWatch this week..

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) -- Chinese regulators have asked domestic banks to stop lending to U.S. financial institutions in the interbank money markets to prevent possible losses during the financial crisis, the South China Morning Post reported Thursday. The China Banking Regulatory Commission's ban on interbank lending of all currencies applied to U.S. banks, but not to lenders from other countries, the report added, citing a source.

I don't need to tell you that the Chinese government operates on group-think. For an official arm of the government to take this step is a howitzer shot across the bow of the U.S. ship of state.

Meanwhile, the current administration has managed to almost entirely alienate the Russians with our persistent meddling overseas ("Avoid foreign entanglements," said George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. "Take over the world," answered a succession of modern politicos). Not shy about giving as good as they get, the Putinistas are moving game pieces closer to home ground.

The memorandum was signed on Monday in Caracas, as a Russian Navy squadron, including the heavy cruiser Peter the Great and three escorts, set sail from St. Petersburg to join Venezuelan vessels in the first show of Russian naval power in the American hemisphere for many years.

They have been preceded by the Russian Air Force, which dispatched a pair of long-range bombers to Venezuela for the past week. A Russian naval spokesman told Mineweb the squadron will operate in the Caribbean, and will enter the sea from the Atlantic Ocean.

And the official mouthpieces of the Russian government, this one from the Russian News and Information Agency, are firing torpedoes at the U.S. dollar. This excerpt from an article entitled "Time for a gold rouble" published yesterday...

Second, the Russian leaders might also consider making their own currency, the ruble, convertible into gold. The idea of gold convertible currencies is extremely unpopular among most economists; they dismiss gold as a "barbarous relic" (to use the famous phrase of John Maynard Keynes) and suggest either the present regime of paper currencies or, at best, a link to a basket of commodities.

Both these solutions are highly artificial and based on the same level of state control which has now just so spectacularly failed. Indeed, which is more "barbarous" -- the reintroduction of gold as an instrument of payment, or the practice of amassing huge quantities of the precious metal to keep it locked underground in the vaults of central banks? The contempt of the Keynesians notwithstanding, it is an indisputable fact that gold does remain the ultimate store of value, which is precisely why states own so much of it.

At this point, even our "friends" are starting to make excuses and reach for their coats. This from a Reuters report on the strong words falling out of the mouth of the German finance minister...

In some of the toughest language since the crisis worsened this month, German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck told parliament the financial turmoil would leave "deep marks" but was primarily an American problem.

"The world will never be as it was before the crisis," Steinbrueck, a deputy leader of the center-left Social Democrats, told the Bundestag lower house.

"The United States will lose its superpower status in the world financial system. The world financial system will become more multi-polar."

It is impossible to fully appreciate, let alone understand, the implications of the loss of the dollar's global reserve status... but it's a topic we'll be digging into. It won't happen overnight, but it will happen.

A Musical Interlude

For something a little lighter, I want to share some of the musical recommendations that were sent by readers in response to my recent solicitation.

Before getting to your recommendations, however, I'll tell you that today I have been listening, repetitively, to the soundtrack from "Once," an excellent film we watched earlier this week. Our own Louis James had first recommended it, followed by another friend, and so I thought I should check it out. It is a simple, beautifully executed, romantic little film... overlaid with powerful music.

The track I'm currently listening to is one of my favorites, "When Your Mind's Made Up." You can listen to it and see a scene from the film, compliments of YouTube, by clicking here. It starts slow, then builds to the point where it pretty much blows me away -- just the kind of music I love.

Okay, so that's my entry this week... now here are yours.

Explosions in the Sky

The Birth and Death of the Day

It's Natural to Be Afraid

All of a Sudden I Miss Everyone

My All Time 5 Favorites... Foo Fighters - Pretender - awesome video where they fight the riot police, btw...

KRS1 - Sound of Da Police ...

NWA - F*** Da Police

Pink Floyd - Another Brick in the Wall Pt. 2

Public Enemy - Fight the Power.

As you may have noticed, I like my music with a message... Music to overthrow your government by! Jeff B.

JS Bach's Toccata and Fugue

It is surpassed only by Hector Berlioz's Requiem, scored for full symphony orchestra, a double choir, and a brass band in each of the hall's four corners. Despite its title, it's a rouser! If you have a good sound system, open

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=berlioz+requiem&search_type=&aq=2&oq=berlio

Start with Requiem et Kyrie, and keep going. C V.

First off, the Isley Bros, in general, are hard to beat. For passion and purity of voice you gotta hear (the late, due to cancer) Eva Cassidy, not exactly rockin' music but well worth the listen. I was delighted to actually find recordings of her live performances on YouTube, though her best album was Songbird.

Other mentionables from assorted categories that are worth a listen and whom you may or may not be familiar with (we're about the same age) are Dan Hicks and His Hot Licks (hippie country rock), Zap Mamma (world), (the late due to dying) Shirley Horn (torch jazz), and early John Mayall (blues).

www.generalfuzz.net

Thanks for all the great insights so far. . . James

So here is my must have for you and maybe you are already enlightened... Yo La Tengo. Writing beautiful rock and roll for 20 years. Check Youtube "Today is the day" and listen to the live performance on John McEnroe's show. Then graduate to "Blue Line Swinger" It is a 9 minute song and the first time you hear it, by minute 4 and 20 seconds your foot will be tapping, the second time I think it will be tapping the whole time. John W.

Gypsy Soul

Obsession Confession

Slash

While speaking of songs that get me movin' (and STOP me from working), I might mention one called Orinoco Flow (Sail Away) by Enya. Sounds as if it would be rather staid if you know anything of her, but there again is something about that song... it got airplay at a time when I was training for powerlifting at some ungodly early time in the morning before work. Whenever that song would come on, I would have to wait to start my set, but I was awake and movin' by the end of it.

How about Classical Gas for a movin' song?

Country music provides the bulk of the really good guitar playing (and I honestly am not that impressed by most rock guitar playing). Roy Clark has been my favorite since I was a kid (although I don't really care to have him sing). And if they were to map my DNA, I believe they would discover a Boogie gene.

And on that note, give a listen to an Aussie flatpicking champion named Tommy Emmanuel.

Now back to work (me, not you). Matt B.

A tune that is a favourite of mine and in keeping with the problems at present (Chris Rea's Highway to Hell) (listen carefully to the lyrics) for your entertainment. Chris M.

David again, I have many more... and will try to cycle in your recommendations in future editions. But for now, time is running short and I need to move on. Thanks to all of you who have contributed... my musical horizons have been expanded.

McPalin Is Toast

This week I finally found the time to spend a little time, figuratively speaking, with Sarah Palin (encouraged by an article Doug Casey is preparing for The Casey Report on McCain's surprise running mate).

I have to say, I was pretty shocked. As I think many Americans will be, as they watch the candidate in action in the weeks just ahead.

The following quote is from Palin's interview with Katie Couric, in response to a question on the bailout.

"That's why I say, I, like every American I'm speaking with, we're ill about this position that we have been put in [fumbling for words to continue] where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the healthcare reform that is needed to help shore up our economy. Um, helping, oh -- it's got to be all about job creation too. Shoring up our economy, and putting it back on the right track. So healthcare reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions, and tax relief for Americans, and trade, we've got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, um, scary thing, but one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today. We've got to look at that as more opportunity. All of those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that."

Huh? What?

Listen, I know there are McPalin supporters out there and, I will say it again, strictly from a personal perspective - i.e., I really don't want to pay any more taxes - if I were forced to pull a lever, it would be for McCain (because a victory by him would mean gridlock, that glorious state where the government's power to "do good" is curtailed). So, don't get angry or send me emails accusing me of being some sort of commie-sympathizer or member of the left-wing media conspiracy.

I'm sure Sarah Palin is a perfectly wonderful person, but she is way out of her league here. And, shortly, the boomerang effect of her media appearances is going to smack McPalin upside the head.

If you don't believe me, watch the following excerpt from the Couric interviews, this one on Palin's purported experience in foreign affairs. (You may have already seen this, because it's starting to make the rounds on the net... which is exactly the problem.)

At this point, I can't see any conceivable way McPalin wins. Which means, get ready for a serious asset stripping come next year.

Miscellaney

Phyling On

phyle

In any event, Herb in Jacksonville, FL is looking to start a phyle.

And the next meeting of the Sacramento phyle is scheduled for September 30th with Ron Parratt of AuEx (one of my favorite explorers) as a guest participant.

And the Toronto group, one of the most active, will be held on October 3... with our own Doug Casey sitting in.

For more details on any of these get-togethers, or any of the other phyles now up and running (this is all happening organically, by the way... all we're doing is facilitating the introductions of the new members to the organizers), contact Kristen at phyle@caseyresearch.com.

Well, that's all that time allows for today. It has been a long and immensely interesting week. We are living through a crisis of a magnitude seen only once a century. While one might take satisfaction by being able to say "I told you so" to sundry friends and associates - you know, the ones who have habitually rolled their eyes and parroted the "all is well" mantra of the financial talk show hosts whenever you have tried to warn them about what's coming... the reality is that these are dangerous times. Even for the prepared.

So, be careful. Especially when discussing topics related to wealth and precious metals ownership. Those who "have" could easily become targets for those who "have not" as this crisis unfolds. Mum's the word.

As I sign off, stocks are largely flat and precious metals are up nicely, to $888. If I were to guess what's going to happen next, it will be that an agreement on the bailout will be announced, the stock market will have another dead-cat bounce... after which it is going to start on a sharp slide.

As always, I greatly appreciate you using some of your valuable time to read this column, blog, musings - whatever it is. Your comments and suggestions are always welcomed, and often directly responded to, by writing david@CaseyResearch.com.

A final note. If you have friends who you think might benefit from our service, we would take it as a great favor if you'd tell them about our services and suggest they take us up on our 3-month no-risk trial subscription for The Casey Report. The next three months should be particularly important, so now's the time to act. You'll be doing them a favor, if for no other reason that our analysis is unbiased because it is beholding to no one except you, our subscribers.

As for the money managers and other talking heads now cheering for the bailout versus warning the people who listen to them to run for cover... well...

I'll leave it at that...

Until next week,

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

Where Is the Economy Going in the Next Six Months?

David Galland — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:04:21 GMT

By Bud Conrad
Chief Economist,
The Casey Report - Casey Research

As investors, the question we have to focus most of our attention on just now is what impact the credit crisis, the bursting housing bubble and the actions of the U.S. government will have on the economy and investment markets in the next six months.

We have seen the Fed and the federal government move to panic mode as they try to keep the system afloat. As expected, they have cut rates, as well as having given away checks and rearranged the Federal Reserve's entire balance sheet.

The underlying problems have not been fixed with this massive bailout. There are still many credit pot holes out there and new lending remains highly constrained. Even the government tax rebate checks, rather than boosting the domestic economy, were largely absorbed by higher oil prices. The resulting cut-back in consumer spending, coupled with ongoing constrictions in lending, will cause a severe slowing of the economy.

But the much bigger implication is that the Fed is busy pouring more gasoline on the fire by fighting the collapsing housing bubble, a housing bubble created by excess liquidity, with yet more liquidity. That is the key point that should be taken from this mess. The dollar is now firmly on an even steeper slope to its ultimate demise. Other currencies will be sliding down the same slope, so another paper currency is not the answer.

This, then, is a high-level context for many of our investment recommendations in the months ahead.

Short Term Projections

1. The housing decline is not yet done, because we will need another year to unwind foreclosures in the pipeline. In addition, the exuberance shown by appraisers at the height of the housing bubble still has a long ways to go to fully deflate. What is that house on the market down the road really worth? At this point, no one knows... and no one will know until it and many others are bought by willing buyers (as opposed to unwilling lenders taking them onto their books in a foreclosure).

2. Consumers in the U.S. are not able to expand credit and are increasingly concerned about the outlook for the economy, so they will slow spending both at home and on imports.

3. The financial/banking system is weaker than understood. The complexity of the global system and the ubiquitous presence of interlocking financial and credit instruments and literally trillions of dollars in derivatives has left the world's banks teetering on the edge.

Adding a push from behind, we have broadly rising inflation and soon the persistently higher interest rates that are the bane of fixed-income investors and financial institutions in general. As the dollar continues its fall, and the banks continue to come under pressure, the lack of confidence in these keystones of the modern financial system will deepen. Already, the Sovereign Wealth Funds that rushed in early in the credit crisis to prop up the big investment houses are now signaling that, at least for the time being, they are going to step back and watch how things shake out.

4. A slowing economy - recession - coupled with inflation, creates a condition often referred to as stagflation, presenting much bigger policy challenges for the government than one or the other alone.

5. The food crisis. Shortages of food production come from rising energy and fertilizer costs. Rising demand comes from a shift in diet, especially in emerging markets, where increasing prosperity leads the citizenry to add more protein to their diets. Important shortages in grains have arisen that don't allow for a bad crop year. Most concerning is that these shortages are occurring despite good crop production last year, an occurrence that can be blamed, in part, on the diversion of some agriculture production for ethanol and bio-diesel.

These food shortages have already contributed to a doubling and tripling in the price of grains over the last two years. But even these elevated prices have not been sufficient to offset the higher costs of the energy required to produce the crops. And, despite today's higher prices, agriculture still lags the price increases seen in many other commodities.

[For more information on the subject of food, watch my recent appearance on FOX Business News here.]

The result of this is that the inflation rate, interest rate, food, energy and precious metals are heading higher as the dollar is debased.

Higher rates are not good for housing and stocks. In the long term, they will recover in nominal terms, though not in actual terms. That's because, while their nominal prices may return to current or near current levels, the dollars used to express their value will have much reduced purchasing power... making those assets a mediocre investment for the foreseeable future.

Finally, it is important to recognize that the world remains in the throes of a deep and serious crisis. While many analysts will express the view that the worst is over or that, after a modest downturn, things will bounce back just like they always have, our view is that what we will actually witness going forward is a fairly steady occurrence of crisis and panic. The crisis will accelerate, moving faster, even, than in previous major shifts such as that witnessed in the 1970s.

While history may find we are too pessimistic at this point in time, in our view it is far better to prepare for a worsening crisis and hope that it does not materialize, than to expect business as usual.

Bud Conrad is the Chief Economist of Casey Research, LLC., publishers of Doug Casey's International Speculator which provides unbiased research and recommendations on the highest quality junior exploration companies.

Casey Research has also recently launched a brand new monthly advisory, The Casey Report, which focuses on the most powerful trends now driving the U.S. and global economy, and how to profit from those trends. As a special introductory offer, when you subscribe to either the International Speculator or The Casey Report before the end of July 2008 you will receive the other free of charge for as long as you remain an active subscriber. Plus, your subscription comes with a full three month money back satisfaction guarantee... so you have nothing to lose when you try these publications today. Learn more about this special offer now.

The Battle for $900 Gold

David Galland — Tue, 06 May 2008 15:23:36 GMT

by David Galland Casey Research- International Speculator

The current "battle" in the gold market is around the $900 level, a fairly steep retrenchment from the recent highs of $1,011.

Some investors, their hopes dashed that $1,000 would be quickly and decisively overrun, are seeing disaster in this correction and dropping their gold as they run for cover.

So... do we at Casey Research think we're now seeing a reversal in gold's fortunes?

In a word, no.

I'm not going to go into meticulous detail here, because that sort of coverage is found in our Casey Research paid publications. But I do want to share some thoughts with you that may be of some use... if for nothing more than playing them back to me in sarcastic emails several months down the road if we're proven wrong.

A few key things to ponder as the battle for $900 gold rages...

1. The current correction is not yet exceptional: Since the current bull market began in earnest in 2001, there have been 9 corrections in excess of 8%.

During the three worst pullbacks, gold fell 15.98%, 18.27%, and 27.7%, respectively. And the average of those corrections is 13.6%, so the latest, which touched 18% at its worst, is only marginally worse than average.

Put another way, for the current pullback to match the sharpest correction to date, a drop of 27.7%, gold would have to fall to about $730. Could it happen, again? Sure, why not?

And if it does, rest assured that, just as they did when gold moved down by that percentage in May of 2006 - falling from $725 to $567 - analysts will line up to say that the back of the gold bull has been broken. But if you had listened to the naysayers back then and bailed out at the bottom of that correction, you would have missed a rebound of close to 100%.

I mention this to stress that the fits and starts we are currently experiencing are nothing unusual. Quite the opposite, they're the norm for any sustained bull market. In the 1970s' sustained gold bull market, a similar pattern occurred.

The bottom line is that if you are going to invest in the resource sector, you need to take a long view. And, I would stress once again, you have to be invested with money that you can afford to lose a substantial portion of and not be overly concerned. Otherwise you'll invariably become shell shocked during periods of volatility and be prone to breaking ranks and selling at the worst possible time.

2. The big gold companies are delivering: One of the largest mining companies in the world, Newmont Mining, just released its first-quarter 2008 financials, the first of the big gold producers to do so.

As we have been forecasting, they had record sales of $1.94 billion, realized a record price of $933 per ounce sold, and saw their cash operating margin soar by 119% from the same period last year. Further, net income was up 444% from Q1 last year. And the company's cash operating margin rose to a record $537 million in Q108 over the prior record $419 million earned in the previous quarter.

Over the next couple of weeks, we'll see a string of similar results from the other major producers, offering a stark contrast to the billions upon billions in losses being suffered by the banks, investment houses, housing industry, airlines, etc.

So, what happened to Newmont's shares on releasing its financials? They fell, albeit modestly, victim to this week's softening gold price and a dumb remark by the minister of mines of Ghana - where Newmont has significant projects - about the need for mining reform in that country. More on that latter topic momentarily.

The key point is that the increase in the profitability of the gold miners, a prerequisite for the entire gold share complex to get moving, is now materializing.

3. Oil is stubbornly holding on over $100 and food prices are on the rise everywhere. This is simply the most visible evidence of the inflation now gripping the world.

We've said for years that there is a very tight correlation between rising oil prices and rising gold prices. While oil prices may moderate at some point - because, again, no market goes straight up or down - the trend is clearly for sustained high prices. This is additional support for gold in our view.

So... given gold's correction, you might go right ahead and sell your gold. I'm hanging on to mine. And if I'm hanging on to my gold, I'm hanging on to my gold stocks, because that's where the real juice will be.

When I look at the alternatives and the amount of risk I have to take to get even a 10% return right now, I am comfortable biding my time, continuing to buy gold and gold share bargains with the expectation that the 100%, 200%, 500% gains down the road will catch me up in a hurry.

Good investing,

David Galland

David Galland is the Managing Director of Casey Research, publishers of the Daily Resource PLUS, a free e-letter offering a concise recap of the 24 hour action in gold, silver, energy, base metals, currencies and more... as well as Doug Casey's monthly International Speculator advisory, presenting comprehensive, unbiased research on undervalued gold and other resource stocks.

A three-month 100% money-back trial is available that allows you to view all current recommendations and decide for yourself whether the International Speculator is right for you. Learn more.

The Room 4/14/08

David Galland — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:05:18 GMT

Written: April 11, 2008

Dear Readers,

No question about it, we humans like to keep things simple. And no wonder; if the world is anything, it is chaotic.

And so we look for our philosophy in un-taxing nuggets, the sort, perhaps, that might grace the back of a cereal box, be squeezed onto a bumper sticker or unfold fully contained in a 5-second sound byte on the evening news.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country" pops to mind.

As does, "You are either with us, or against us."

But few hold a candle to, "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."

Thus wrote Karl Marx, by reliable accounts a penniless, unpopular, slovenly loser throughout the entirety of his miserable existence. Yet, avoiding any deep contemplation, the masses gravitated to his slogan, resulting in hundreds of millions of deaths and untold misery that carries forward even to this day.

This willingness, nay, rush, to unthinkingly embrace the simplistic is very possibly coded into our DNA. And for good reason.

After all, if our club-bearing ancestors had paused to inquire more closely into the root reason that the rest of their hunting group was running screaming from the large growling sound emanating from a nearby bush, then we wouldn't be having this chat today. Instead, they took the cue and dedicated themselves to outrunning their companions (a race that our very presence here today attests they won).

Millennia of similar experience, and the need to efficiently sort through the daily onslaught of input our poor minds receive, has resulted in a tendency by humans to think in one of two ways, depending on our individual temperaments and the need at hand.

The first form of thinking is cue-based, or heuristic. The second is termed "systematic." To understand the difference, consider the process you might go through when looking for a new computer. You could do all the hard research yourself; that would be thinking systematically... or you could simply pick up the current edition of some suitable buyer's guide and flip straight to the "Best of 2008" award and you are done.

While we all think in both modes, most tend to shift between the two, some more frequently than others. And because it is more difficult, most of us look to reduce the amount of systematic thinking we are required to do by delegating that responsibility to those who are good at that sort of thing. For example, we might pay an accountant to do our taxes. Likewise, if you are collared for some real or imaginary offense, you could immerse yourself in all the various case laws that apply to your situation, or you could pick up the phone to call a lawyer.

In my view, it is essential in this modern age to keep this aspect of our human nature in clear perspective as you listen to all the electioneering, posturing and pontificating that now competes for your daily attention.

Or, put another way, when confronted with convenient explanations or fine-sounding platitudes, make a concentrated effort to shift into systematic thinking mode.

While I could point to literally hundreds of jingoistic but empty ideas floating through the ether just now, our globe-trotting chairman Doug Casey has just written in from Argentina with a good example , one that has specific relevance to us as investors. Namely that today's inflation is being caused by rising commodity prices.

Rising Commodity Prices and Inflation

By Doug Casey

Many people blame inflation on higher prices of gasoline, wheat, copper, or what have you. This is an old, idiotic, and tragic economic fallacy.

It's idiotic because it confuses the consequences of currency inflation with its cause. And tragic because it blames inflation on those who produce real wealth, as opposed to the government, which is the actual cause.

In today's world, governments, through the central banks, control the amount of money in existence. If they double the money supply, the general price level would double. Of course not everything rises at the same rate. Since inflation initially makes people feel richer, perhaps the prices of Ferraris would go up a lot - but the prices of old Chevys would drop - who wants old cars when loans are out there for a new one?

If the money supply is stable, and one commodity goes up a lot, the price of others must drop - the general price level, in terms of dollars, stays the same.

Inflation causes people to save less. That means there's less capital to invest for new production, even while it encourages more consumption now (to beat anticipated higher prices). This is the main reason inflation causes the standard of living to drop - in addition to causing the business cycle.

Bad Speculators

David again, though continuing on the same theme. This morning I heard an interview between a National Public Radio host and Robert Zoellick, head of the World Bank, about that august body's recently released report on rising food prices and the social unrest now beginning to break out as a result.

I have to say, while I tend to be very skeptical of supra- organizations such as the World Bank, Zoellick impressed me as a reasonable man when he failed to rise to the bait of the interviewer who must have asked the same question 5 times, along the lines of "How much are speculators having to do with the food price run up?"

It was only after much more of the same that the conversation turned to the actual biggest culprit identified in the World Bank survey; the shift toward redirecting food crops, and the land used to grow same, to the production of biofuels. A misallocation that would not have been made without government mandates and massive subsidies.

I recently read a pretty good book on the history of the U.S. dust bowl that has become iconic, along with soup lines, of the Great Depression of the 1930s. The book, titled The Worst Hard Time, was quite revealing... for example, of the stubborn optimism of certain people who -- despite year after year of failed crops and dusters that would cover the floors of their shacks in a foot of fine dust, kill the cattle and even close family members -- refused to move away, figuring it couldn't last forever.

If, in fact, they had done a systematic evaluation of the climate of the dissected areas where they had been encouraged with free land by the government to set up their farms in order to meet global food demands triggered by World War I,they would have found that drought in the Texas panhandle is the norm, not the exception.

In the latter years of the disaster, the Roosevelt administration commissioned an extensive study to reveal what had gone wrong. According to the author, Roosevelt and his merry men expected to find it was caused by climate change coupled with excessive speculation. What the study's leader eventually reported, however, was far less pleasing: it was the government's own well-intentioned but poorly considered machinations that were behind the dust bowl. That's because without the subsidies, the mass migration to an area that was climatologically ill suited to agriculture would never have happened.

Not one to suffer second guessing, Roosevelt pretty much disregarded the study. In fact, he went further and, disregarding the whole "climatologically ill suited to agriculture" part, attempted to solve the problem by ordering the planting of millions of trees... virtually all of which quickly died.

But back to the present. As food prices rise, along with virtually everything else, the sloganeering and rhetoric are going to reach a shrill pitch. The government will begin to point the finger at anyone and anything other than the real causes, starting no doubt with "speculators," who will be portrayed in the same light as war profiteers.

The practical implications of this -- other than stirring up the class warfare so fondly anticipated by Marx as he sat in his grubby chair scrawling a screed against the capitalists -- will be to unleash any number of government "solutions" that will sound high minded, but lead to low results. Price controls... interference in the free flow of foreign capital... trade sanctions... changes in margin requirements for commodities accounts... higher capital gains taxes. It's all coming.

At our recent Scottsdale Summit, one of the more memorable thoughts was shared by Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute when he pointed out that the government was increasingly using higher taxes on tobacco to raise the costs and therefore curb the habitual use of the noxious weed. "And, you know what, the government got it right. Higher taxes do reduce consumption," Mitchell commented, adding, "So why is it the politicians don't understand that the same principles also apply to commerce and investment markets?"

A good question, but one that most people won't ask themselves as they applaud President Obama's proposed near-doubling of the capital gains tax from 15% to 28%.

Take cover.

Guess Who Will Soon Own 1,000,000 Homes? You Will!

A couple of weeks ago, I mentioned the view of real estate pro Andy Miller that, absent government intervention, the real estate meltdown would be incredibly painful, but relatively short lived. But if the government rolled up its sleeves and set about "fixing" things, the pain could stretch out 10 or even 20 years.

At this point, the odds greatly favor the latter.

In fact, we seem to be in a race to the bottom for the candidates, egged on by the professional posturers that hold forth in Washington.

Case in point, House Finance Committee Chairperson Barney Franks, maybe the least financially savvy human being I have ever heard discourse on the topic of finance, has teamed up with Senator Christopher Dodd to propose the nation set up a special $400 billion taxpayer-funded pool for the sole and specific purpose of buying non-performing loans from troubled lenders.

When confronted by such largess in the past, I have been known to make indelicate remarks. A plan of this degree of sheer disregard for anything remotely resembling the free enterprise system leaves me nearly speechless. $400,000,000,000 is a lot of money, no matter what anyone tells you.

And the democrats are not alone. Even John McCain, bending to the anticipated wishes of the voters this next November, has just done a brisk about-face and announced his own bailout plan. A plan that but for some modest window dressing, is almost identical to that which has been proposed by Mssrs. Barney and Dodd. To quote Bloomberg,

The (McCain) plan would retire old loans that homeowners no longer can pay and replace them with less expensive, 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages that are federally guaranteed. McCain said families would gain "the opportunity to trade a burdensome mortgage for a manageable loan that reflects the market value of their home."

Karl Marx would be proud.

But am I being too harsh in condemning government action? After all, when we are talking about collapsing housing prices, we are talking about real hardship being felt by real people... with lots more to come.

It's a good question, even though I asked it myself. But the answer is relatively straightforward, albeit in the form of another question.

"Which economic system has history proven to provide the maximum reward to the maximum number of people over a sustained period of time?"

I think the answer is clear. So, faced with an economic distortion encouraged by decades of government meddling, do we step further away from free-market capitalism and toward yet more meddling? Or, do we accept that there is a price to be paid and the longer the bill remains unpaid, the steeper it inevitably will be?

Humankind is remarkably adaptable and, when pushed to it, resilient. If the government could resist doing anything at this point, lenders would fail, house prices would return to a market clearing level, people in the housing trades would find other employment... but the world would not come to an end.

That said, I can't see any way that the government is going to be able to resist organizing a big bailout... so all I can do is the next best thing: position my portfolio to profit by betting on the inflation that such a bailout makes inevitable.

The Ascent of Humanity

My friend and favorite partner of all times, Doug Casey, is well known to be a pessimist in the short term, but is, I can assure you, equally so a raving optimist in the longer term. Viewing the world through his longer lens, he sent me an interesting, albeit brief, essay from John Robb this week.

It is an update of sort on humankind's progress in trying to create artificial intelligence. Robb's thesis has it that we are very, very close – a few years at most – from being able to reliably duplicate the intelligence of an insect. Within a decade, he expects we will have reproduced the intelligence of a mammal. Say, a rat. And by the end of the next decade, we will have succeeded in duplicating the intellect of a human being.

Each of these milestones, according to Robb, will change the face of the world as we know it. You can read his full essay by following this link here: http://www.blogdimension.com/en/cache?s=36282661-of-rats-and-superempowerment

In making his case, Robb links to a video of the Big Dog robot, which is quite amazing. You can skip straight to the You Tube clip by clicking here. www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1czBcnX1Ww

And this is just one of many areas where humans are making rapid progress toward a more promising future. For instance, if you credit the reports out of the Swiss firm, CERN, they have figured out how to make the Internet 10,000 times faster.

Given that I am already able to use the current version of the Internet to view a wide selection of movies from Netflix, near instantly, it's hard for me to fathom the possibilities inherent in an exponentially faster Internet.

The new system will be available to universities this summer and, I have to believe, will roll out pronto thereafter.

Is there an investment angle in this stunning new development?

While a topic for greater exposition than time allows now, there are two companies (in addition to CERN) that are standing squarely in the path of this breakthrough, and both are related to fiber optics, which is a prerequisite for delivering information at this speed. The first is JDS Uniphase (JDSU), the leader, by a wide margin, in the manufacturing of fiber optics switching equipment. The second, my friend Porter Stansberry told me last week on Jekyll Island, is Verizon (VZ), which has been spending the majority of its revenues in recent years building out the most extensive fiber optics system in the United States. The build-out will soon be done, allowing the company to redirect the billions they have been spending on infrastructure back to the bottom line. And, more importantly, to sally forward as a primary beneficiary of the new and vastly improved Internet.

Watch Out Below

As predicted by our own Bud Conrad, bond insurer MBIA, Inc. was downgraded this week by Fitch Ratings to AA from AAA.

The knock-on effect of this has yet to be felt, but the way these things work is that any of the AAA bonds insured by MBIA will now have to be similarly downgraded, because no bond can have a higher rating than the company that insures it. Holders of these bonds now have to revalue them in their portfolios, especially if, as expected, the other rating agencies follow suit.

For a quick snapshot of the sort of turmoil this could unleash, here is an excerpt from the January 2008 edition of the International Speculator.

Credit Insurance. The smaller corporate and municipal borrowers (which together represent a large segment of the bond market) depend on credit insurance. Now the credit insurers are in trouble. S&P cut the credit rating of ACA Capital Holdings by 12 levels, to CCC (junk), after the company posted a $1.04 billion third-quarter loss in November. ACA has $1.1 billion to cover potential losses on $7.1 billion of bonds it insured. It turned itself over to the regulators for protection in late December. The credit rating companies are now reviewing MBIA Inc., Ambac Financial Group Inc. and other bond insurers because of concern they don't have enough money to cover losses on accelerating downgrades of the debt they guarantee. Weakness in these companies would endanger the value of $2.4 trillion of securities they've insured.

It goes on and on. Certain money market funds have been hurt by the commercial paper meltdown. More may follow. Because of their bond investments, some insurance companies are in the crosshairs as well. Stay tuned...

China's Olympic Torchture

In the March 14, 2008 edition of this weekly feature, I touched on the decision by the Chinese to hoist the Olympic torch to the top of Tibet (Mount Everest, to be more specific) as possibly being one of those accidents of history with serious repercussions.

But I didn't foresee how fast and how far things could have gone off the tracks. In the lead-up to previous Olympics, being selected to run with the torch was a high honor. The sort to be photographed for your personal posterity and dropped in passing into every cocktail conversation you might be drawn into. This time around, however, carrying the torch is akin to being selected by Native Americans of antiquity for the dubious honor of running the gauntlet. You might survive, but it's no sure thing. And it is certainly nothing you'll be bragging about to anyone in particular, lest you be accused of being a keen supporter of oppression.

Even if the Chinese, who have assigned a cadre of toughs to protect the flame, go one step further and borrow the Popemobile to finish delivering the torch to Beijing, the public relations damage they are suffering is akin to the death of a thousand cuts, with each step along the route bringing another cut. (For those of you with strong stomachs and curious about the origins of that term, I provide this link... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow_slicing)

While we can't yet know how the Chinese will react to their global humiliation, if you look at the language used by China's foreign ministry in objecting to a U.S. resolution calling for China to stop beating up the Tibetans, you can get a sense of the emotions involved...

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu labeled the resolution passed Wednesday by the House of Representatives anti-Chinese, saying it "twisted Tibet's history and modern reality... seriously hurting the feelings of the Chinese people."

(I suspect that whoever it was that conceived the idea of taking the torch to Tibet has already received some indication of the leadership's displeasure.

I can imagine a short conversation along the lines of, "Mr. Han, please come in. We would like to talk to you about that idea you had about taking the Olympic torch to the top of Mt. Everest. No need to sit down; in fact, if you'd be so kind to just stand up against that wall over there... yes, that should be fine.")

Given the clout that the Chinese currently have in the global economy, and given the fact that they are actively competing for all manner of natural resources with many of those nations whose spokespersons are now lining up to condemn them over their human rights record, this is definitely a geopolitical situation to keep an eye on.

On that latter point, this week the news came out that China is looking to buy 9% of BHP Billiton, the world's largest mining company... a move that follows their purchase of 9.3% of Rio Tinto in February for $14 billion. And last week it was revealed that they had dropped $2.8 billion to buy a stake in Total, the French oil producer.

This week the market was moved by news that the Chinese are on the hunt to acquire Canadian uranium companies. Referring to its quest for uranium companies, according to Bloomberg...

State-owned China National Nuclear is considering options including takeovers and supply agreements that range in value from "several hundred million dollars to more than a billion," Cui Jianchun, general manager of subsidiary CNNC Finance Co., said in an interview yesterday in Toronto.

Call it what you will, but I think you can safely call it a War for the World's Resources, with U.S. dollars being used as ammunition.

It is too early to discern what will be the ultimate consequences of China's Olympic-sized embarrassment – which will continue through the event's closing ceremonies on August 24 – but they could be serious.

[Ed. Note: In my reading this week, I came across a pretty good essay on this topic on the BBC web site. You can read it here... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7339764.stm]

And There's This...

While we are on the topic of China, I thought I would share an email from one of our many fine subscribers. He penned the following in response to my previous skeptical musings on what I see as the myth of Chinese invincibility....

Dear David,

I have been a Casey subscriber for a number of years now and find that one of the highlights of my week is 'The Room.' Your easy style is always a pleasure and it never detracts from the clarity of the underlying message; however, when discussing China - its massive (and growing) economic influence and the ability, or otherwise, of its ruling elite to "manage" the immense changes taking place - I find it odd that no mention is ever made of the demographic time bomb inherent in the One Child diktat.

My wife and I traveled through China in the mid-1990's and wherever one went, you would see groups of parents and grandparents fawning over a single child. Fast forward to today and consider the consequences. Those children have no uncles, aunts or cousins. A typical family would now comprise - in it's entirety - one grandchild, two parents and four grandparents! Also consider the fact that traditionally, boy children are preferred to girls. The result is a significant gender imbalance eventuating in a preponderance of males.

In a society where security in old age has always depended on the support of an extended family, an intolerable burden is now placed on a single grandchild and that grandchild, if it is a male, is also going to have a tough job finding a wife! As this imbalance works its way through the Chinese population, we can expect severe, and unpleasant, consequences.

Yours sincerely,
R.H.

Not a new story, but one that has yet to really play out. Food for thought, to be sure.

Miscellany

Lunch Money. Follow the link here to read another reason for keeping some of your money in gold. I love the bank's response, which is pretty much, "Sorry about that." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7334033.stm

Out of Silver? There has been a lot of discussion in the blogosphere about the lack of silver coins at dealers. We did some research on the topic and the situation appears to be nothing more than a miscalculation by the mints leading to a temporary shortage in the circular blanks required to make coins. Proof of that point comes from one close acquaintance of ours who placed an order for $1M in silver the week before last and had the bars promptly delivered.

A Solution for Global Warming! I had a good chuckle this week when reading a story by Bloomberg on a study issued by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences about the possible consequences to the environment by a nuclear war involving "100 Hiroshima-size bombs." The story relates how, should such a conflagration occur, it would cause damage to the ozone layer, resulting in an increase in skin cancer, eye damage and similar illnesses caused by more extreme exposure to sunlight. But nowhere in the story was there a single mention of the straight-up death and destruction caused to people by "100 Hiroshima-size bombs" going off, or the ill effects of the clouds of radiation that would soon blot out the sun. They did mention, however, that one possible outcome was that global land temperatures would drop. So, there's that to look forward to.

* Errata. Last week, while writing in the fog of early morning, I misplaced a decimal point when discussing the percentage of GDP represented by Mexican oil exports... which, based on the Export Land Model, should cease in, or before, 2014. While the error was fixed on Monday morning -- to more accurately reflect the total at about 6.5% of GDP versus the errant 65% -- if you viewed this missive over the weekend, you might have seen the erroneous number and so have sallied forth with poor information, for which I apologize. While not nearly so significant, the lower number is still very significant.

That's It for This Week

As I prepare to sign off for this week, it came across the screen that consumer confidence in the U.S. has now fallen to a 26-year low. One of the drivers of this pessimism, according to the report, was the price of gas... a commodity that indeed hits consumers straight in the pocket. Earlier this week, I read a report by the International Energy Agency that they expect oil to remain above $100 per bbl for the rest of the year.

This is one of those stubborn economic inputs that the U.S. government, despite all its real power, is helpless to affect. That's because the U.S. imports over 65% of its oil. We can't, therefore, force producers to sell it cheaper to us... because the Chinese, among others, will simply step in and pay the market price. Confronted with consumer backlash, the only real action I can see that is left to the U.S. government, should it wish to be seen as "doing something," is to subsidize prices. In other words, reach into the public coffers to pick up some of the tab. But that, of course, simply adds fuel of a different sort to the inflationary fires. There is no positive way to view this situation, especially for those who have a long commute, or for businesses – airlines for example – that are so solidly impacted by persistently high fuel prices. On that last point, you might want to check your portfolio for exposure to any companies where fuel looms large in their P&Ls.

As always, thank you for reading, and for subscribing to a Casey Research publication. (If you had this edition passed on to you, and you would like to subscribe... visit us at www.CaseyResearch.com).

Sincerely,

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

The Room 3/24/08

David Galland — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:52:56 GMT

Dear Reader,

It used to be of no little pride in the small New England town where Casey Research is headquartered that school went forward, no matter the weather. Hail, 8-foot-high snow drifts, ice rain and, should they have occurred hereabouts (which they didn't), I am fairly sure that even hurricanes and tornadoes would not have kept the school administration from its daily labors in the brainwashing of innocent youth.

That all changed when, earlier this winter, a school bus missed the turn on a gently sloping hill and rolled onto its side, fortunately causing no serious injuries (for some reason, which continues to baffle me, the police will stop and ticket you for driving without a seat belt, yet school buses are systematically unequipped with same).

The accident, no doubt, made the school officialdom aware of some previously unexamined legal consequence because the school now delays the morning opening or closes down tight on what appears to me to be so much as a semi-reliable report that a single threatening snowflake has been observed in the general vicinity.

And so it is that, with a modest snowfall in process, the kids are home again today, lounging about and, because it is Friday when I write from home, crowding me out of my office (which counter-intuitively also serves as their toy room). Which leaves me to write to you from a couch upstairs, with stern instructions to the kids that while I may appear to be in residence, they should assume I am a figment of their youthful imaginations until I have finished writing this weekly epistle.

While it is typically with a good deal of pleasure that I sit down to reminisce about the action of the week just ending, this week again, the volume of news coupled with the magnitude of that news makes the task daunting. But no amount of dithering will make the task go away, so here we go.

"Commodities Drop, Rally in Dollar, Stocks Vindicate Bernanke"

That headline is not mine, it is from Bloomberg this morning. Bloomberg's enthusiasm is based, as hard as I find it to believe, on little more than that the Fed cut the rate it charges banks to borrow by "just" 75 basis points this week, and that the stock market rallied, then fell, then rallied again in response.

The herd was, apparently, expecting 1%. Further, not only were they expecting this, they were mentally prepared to accept a 1% cut as a sign that the economy remained in dire straits and that, as a result, the Fed would have to continue its loose money policy. According to the punditry, a 75 bps cut indicates that Bernanke and Co. have drawn a line in the sand, signaling they were going to be restrained in their approach to the crisis now stalking the land. Further, this show of confidence portends that the worst of the crisis is nearly behind us.

Ready to push the trigger to buy more commodities on a 1% rate cut, the market instead rushed into buy stocks and sell commodities... then changed its mind and sold stocks and commodities... then bought stocks again, but still sold commodities.

Gold, silver, oil, grain... you name it, if it shows up under the heading Commodities in the back of your favorite paper, then it got hit.

But of course, there was a whole lot more going on this week. We'll come back to the commodities momentarily. First, however, we need to walk up a few floors to get a better view of the bigger picture.

Problem Solved?

Now, you will excuse me if I seem a touch skeptical, but I can't help but notice that short of climbing aboard helicopters rigged to carry pallets of dollars, the Fed is now doing exactly what we have been expecting it to: provide all the liquidity it can muster using its near mystical powers of money creation.

In addition to yet another deep cut in the Fed Funds rate, they are now making the almost unprecedented move (at least since the Great Depression) of lending money to non-commercial banks, in the process effectively putting taxpayers on the hook for $30 billion in suspect collateral from Bear Stearns.

And that's just one of many moves of late, including cutting discount rates by a total of 1%, to 2.5% over the past week alone, and opening up new lending facilities that allow the investment banks to borrow directly from the Fed using as collateral the same sort of suspect paper that brought down Bear.

Playing their part, three of the biggest investment banks, Goldman, Morgan Stanley and, importantly, Lehman, announced that they were going to access this new lending facility, whether they need to or not, in order to remove the "stigma" (their term) of stepping up to the window, so to speak.

Give that some thought for a second. What they were saying for all the world to hear was that they were going to engage in what is effectively an institutional shell game... a deliberate attempt to obfuscate which of the banks are actually in trouble. As a shareholder in one of these companies, you won't have any idea whether your bank is accessing this emergency facility because it is, in fact, in trouble.

Given the estimates that the assets being carried as capital on the books of Bear Stearns were worth only 10% of what was being posted, and the herd-like business practices of the big investment houses, the odds are fairly high that Bear Stearns is not the only institution teetering on the brink.

Yet this week investors seemed to actually buy the idea that the worst is now over, and that the all-clear signal will soon be sounded.

What to believe? Whom to believe? Could the Fed have finally figured out the right combination to re-open the safe of prosperity? And what of the commodities, especially gold?

This week I have received a larger than usual amount of incoming emails presenting all sorts of theories. Some have it that JPMorgan, the world's largest bullion bank, was in real trouble with shorts on gold and had been buying the metal back, helping to fuel its meteoric rise of late, but that the liquidity provided by the Fed has now taken the pressure off and allowed them to stop or slow their buying (our own Bud Conrad has been looking into this notion, but so far has uncovered no solid proof).

As for the financial sector and, by extension the rest of the market, we can't know for sure what's going on behind the scenes, because the government and the big banks are playing it very close to the vest. But we can, from our higher perch, try to sort the unknown from the known, and start with the latter.

This week we had a major bank failure (as predicted many months ago by Bud). Despite Jim Cramer's firm belief in the firm, Bear Stearns, the fifth largest U.S. investment bank and a firm tightly connected as a counter party to hundreds of billions in derivative agreements, suffered a good old-fashioned meltdown.
We know that the share price of Bear Stearns has fallen from over $150 last year to as low as $2.00, and what is left of the firm is now being sucked into JPMorgan, but only because the Fed has agreed to stand behind the deal to the tune of $30 billion, an intervention the likes of which was last witnessed in the Great Depression.
We also know that the vultures were starting to circle Lehman, another member of the big five U.S. investment banks. Absent the Fed's aggressive intervention, the odds were fairly high they would have been next to get hit with the equivalent of a run. This is why the Treasury and the Fed worked so hard to get the Bear Stearns deal cobbled together over a single weekend, before the markets reopened and Mr. Market could recommence beserking. From where I sit, it appears that we came within hours of seeing another of the nation's largest financial institutions crash, potentially taking down the whole house of cards.
And we know the Fed dropped the Fed Funds rate by 0.75, only the second time in the last decade that it has cut rates by an amount that large.

We know some other things as well. For instance, that commodities have been on the equivalent of a one-way-up escalator in recent months. And we know that no market goes in only one direction for any sustained period of time, and so a correction was inevitable. Gold, oil, the grains... they all had to take a breather. And so they have.

But Let's Try to Keep This All in Perspective...

What has actually occurred over the last month, between February 21 and March 20?

	Gold	Silver	Copper	Oil	Bear Stearns	JPMorgan	Lehman
21-Feb-08	$945.00	$17.98	$3.77	$98.39	$82.23	$43.07	$54.14
20-Mar-08	$925.75	$17.53	$3.62	$104.49	$5.96	$45.97	$48.65
Gain or Loss	-2.0%	-2.5%	-4.1%	6.2%	-92.8%	6.7%	-10.1%

Okay, so gold and silver are off a little, copper a bit more, oil is still up, Bear Stearns is a smoking hole in the ground, JPMorgan is up a bit, and Lehman is down 10%. Other than Bear Stearns and, to a lesser degree, Lehman, I'm not seeing anything so earth shattering. (Sure, gold recently took a high dive off the $1,000 per ounce mark... but it is still over $900, a level that not one in ten thousand investors, if asked a year ago, would have expected it to trade at. And oil over $100? Forget about it.)

There are a few more things we know. For instance, that consumers are debt strapped and the housing bubble has burst and is deflating rapidly. And that falling home prices are wiping out the net worth, discretionary spending power and positive sentiment of the U.S. consumer who has, heretofore, shown a seemingly unlimited willingness to go into debt up to their eyeballs to keep the world economy afloat. That is now changing.

We also have proof, if proof was needed, that the government will do whatever it takes to avoid a meltdown. While they are shoving the walnut shells around so fast that it's hard to figure out where the pea is these days, what is increasingly clear is that there is only one real plan at this point: to apply as many billions of dollars as they feel is necessary to keep the ship of state afloat.

And while some might like to think that the country is not in a recession, at this point I am going to put it down as fact that a recession is now underway and that we need to be worried about it becoming much uglier than that.

Blame it on Smokey the Bear

A good way to understand both the degree and the nature of the current crisis is to look at the state of the nation's western forests. Before the 1940s, forest fires were allowed to run their course, just as they had over the millennia. But then the government adopted a policy to fight every fire, a battle epitomized by the introduction of the iconic Smokey the Bear. What has happened since is a massive build-up in the fire risk in federally managed forests.

The following is from a CATO Institute document on the topic...

Since the advent of the Smokey Bear era in the 1940s, tree density in federal forests has increased from 50 per acre to as much as 300 to 500 per acre. Federal forests are filled with dense stands of small, stressed trees and plants that combine with dry deadwood to provide virtual kindling wood for forest fires.

According to Forest Service statistics, some two-thirds of federally held forested lands are in deteriorating health.

The consequence of governmental meddling in the forest is that when a fire now breaks out, it is exponentially larger, more dangerous and more expensive to fight. Nationwide, the forested area now at extreme risk is equal to an area about the size of the state of California.

One of these days, and probably sooner rather than later, there will be a forest fire of biblical proportions... and Smokey's real-life brethren, along with houses and all that moves or doesn't, will go up in smoke.

Similarly, by continuously tampering with the business cycle, the government has led us to the point where the dried underbrush is piled high and just waiting for a match. The Fed was able to throw a quick tanker load of water onto the Bear Stearns fire... but that doesn't mean we are anywhere near out of the woods. (Don't you just love it when your metaphors snap so nicely in line? I sure do!)

Which Brings Up an Interesting Question

Given virtually unlimited power, including the ability to create money out of nothing, or to change any rule or law or convention, bend any arm, or ban or hinder trading in any commodity... just how much power can the U.S. government apply to the problems now besetting our economy and, by extension, the world?

Or, looked at from the reverse angle, given its unlimited power, is there any way Paulson, Bernanke, et al can fail to stabilize things?

It is an interesting discussion, and one that requires more analysis and data than I'm in a position to provide sitting here on my couch on a Friday morning. (We will go into it in more detail in a special report on the crisis that is being worked up for paid subscribers, and which should be issued following our Scottsdale Crisis & Opportunity Summit next week.)

I will, however, comment just a bit further.

Let's start with the proposition that the government has absolute power, which is largely the case these days, especially because the populace is so numb to large numbers that outrage at the beggaring of future generations no longer seems to be of any concern to anyone.

So, the Fed can effectively pump out all the money it needs to "get her done" and if that doesn't do it, then the Treasury can step back in. This approach, from a policy maker's perspective, is quite attractive because it essentially papers over the problem. Look at it this way. If housing prices fall, on average, 20% nationwide, but the currency depreciates at the same level, then housing weakness would be masked... ditto 20% of stock market losses. In case that point is not clear, look at it like this. If your house is worth $100,000 and it loses 20%, its value would fall to $80,000. But if the dollar was to simultaneously lose 20%, then the price of the house would remain $100,000. The average person would be clueless they have just taken a 20% haircut. Pretty cool, eh?

Unfortunately for the government, there are natural limits to everything. In this case, the most immediate threat to this plan resides in the trillions of dollars held by foreigners.

In recent decades these foreigners, trading partners mostly, have been willing to swap our inflation in exchange for market share within the U.S., the greatest consumption engine on the planet (as an FYI, the eurozone just surpassed us).

But that inflation is beginning to be felt back home: in China, in the Middle East, Russia and everywhere between. At some point, the pain, and the realization that inflation in the U.S. is only going to get worse, is very likely to make these dollar holders get serious about breaking their links with the dollar, and dumping the trillions they now hold.

And while U.S. consumers are well aware that everything costs more these days, no matter what the jury-rigged CPI tells them, it is when the foreigners start repatriating our dollars that the real pain of inflation will begin. At that point, the fire starts in earnest.

I call this the Point of Mugabe, named in honor, of course, of Robert Mugabe, the supreme overlord of Zimbabwe. A dictator with absolute power in all matters, Mugabe's maladministration of his country's economy has finally reached the point where today, as much as he dictates against it, inflation runs in excess of 100,000% annually. While the sheeple of that country seem either particularly stupid, beaten down or tolerant, sooner rather than later Mr. Mugabe's ridiculous regime will come to an end, and probably not in a manner that he will find personally pleasant.

In the final analysis, I remain convinced that the praise of Bernanke et al based on their extreme actions this past week will find its way into the history books along with quotes such as these...

"The end of the decline of the Stock Market will probably not be long, only a few more days at most." --Irving Fisher, November 1929

"I see nothing in the present situation that is either menacing or warrants pessimism... I have every confidence that there will be a revival of activity in the spring, and that during this coming year the country will make steady progress." --Andrew W. Mellon, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, December 1929

And, of course, my favorite recent example... Jim Cramer's rant that people should not take their money out of Bear Stearns, just a day before that firm collapsed. You can watch history in the making by clicking here.

We'll have a lot more on this topic in our upcoming special update report on the crisis, which will be sent to all paid subscribers the week after next.

What's Coming

In my reading for the above, I came across the September 2007 edition of the International Speculator and its lead article, Preparing for Crisis . I thought the following excerpt was worth sharing, not just because it shows how spot-on Bud Conrad, the chief economist of this operation, has been in forecasting the specifics of the unfolding crisis, but because it is still as useful today as then in understanding how things are likely to keep rolling out (the full article has much more detail, well worth reviewing). Here's the excerpt.

The credit crisis will not end soon. Here's what we think is coming.

More Defaults. The bulk of the subprime loans are adjustable rate mortgages. The continuing reset of up to $50 billion per month of subprime ARMs will keep mortgage defaults growing, which will keep home prices falling, which means that more of the defaults will turn into unrecoverable losses for the investors holding the paper. The hedge funds that haven't thrown in the towel on subprime mortgages will collapse one by one.
The economy will slow down. Lending to risky customers has dried up. Earnings of most corporations will slide because consumers, who can no longer turn to home equity loans and whose credit cards are already maxed out, will cut spending. The mounting losses in CDOs and the continuing defaults in the housing industry will precipitate a severe credit crunch. The capital of many banks is about to shrink, which will hamper their ability to lend.
Stocks will fall. The next phase down in the stock market will come from reduced earnings estimates for 2008. We could see an auto company or a big bank announce insolvency. Fear, and then the fear of fear itself, and the fear of being the last one out the door will take over. Big, 300 or 400 point moves - mostly down - will become regular events. People have forgotten, but they are going to be reminded, that stocks have, until fairly recently in history, normally yielded about twice as much as bonds, simply because they're riskier.
Dollar down. While U.S. citizens are looking to build cash - another source of pressure on spending and investment - few foreigners now want U.S. dollars or dollar-denominated debt. After the failure of large U.S. institutions begins and the Fed turns the printing presses on full blast in an attempt to keep liquidity in the system, flight to safety will mean a flight from the dollar. How fast they will print is hard to guess. They've already started, but will probably panic as the economy slows, and then turn the presses to high. The dollar will fall in purchasing power. Interest rates will rise across the board, with low-quality paper hurt the worst.

If you are not yet receiving the International Speculator, now is a great time to sign up. With the 3-month risk-free guarantee, you can take a leisurely look at the publication to see if it's right for you. Check it out.

Show Me the Money!

This week we have, as you'd expect given gold's steep plunge, received some email wondering when the junior gold stocks we tend to favor in the International Speculator (among other investments that we feel are appropriate to the current environment) will pick themselves off the mat and get on with the business of making serious money.

This is, of course, a topic I have discussed at some length recently, so I won't go into the topic much again here (look back over the past couple of issues, using the archive link below).

But I will say, again, that I remain convinced that the next big move in the junior explorers is still ahead, and will come as the big gold stocks once again confirm the new reality that they are becoming cash machines. And they begin using their newly beefed-up balance sheets to acquire the deposits needed to replenish their depleting reserves. If you keep selling ounces without replacing them, in time, you are nothing but a shell... and so replacing reserves is a business dictate.

On that front, Barrick just announced that it will spend $10 billion to acquire new mines and resources over the next little while. You can read the story here:

And there's this. This week, PricewaterhouseCoopers released its Mining Deals 2007 Annual Review... which, among other prognostications reported on in an article on same by the folks at MineWeb, included these...

"2008 looks set to see mining deals reach very high record levels as super-consolidation takes place in the market."

Despite the credit crunch, the report finds "little evidence of a slowdown in [mining] deal activity."

"Underpinning these trends is the quest for world scale, resource acquisition and resource diversification," the analysts asserted.

The study noted that exploration costs are at all-time highs, permitting takes longer, and mining companies are facing skills' shortages. "These are significant barriers to meeting what is a major upturn in world demand."

(read the full MineWeb article on the topic by clicking here.)

This is all just the tip of the iceberg if you ask me, and it bodes very, very well for the juniors that are already sitting on a discovery. Yes, it is frustrating that some of our favorites have fallen with the broader markets lately... but this is a sector you need to be patient with.

On that topic, yesterday someone asked me if our subscribers were early adopters. And, after a moment's thought, I answered, "Yes. They are looking to get in early on a trend, and in investments that will provide far bigger returns than average."

Early adopters, however, have to possess both patience and a tolerance for risk. If not, then you may be invested in the right sector, but with the wrong temperament... a recipe for disaster. To wit, you won't have the emotional staying power to get you through the inevitable down swings and so you will invariably sell at exactly the wrong time, on a big setback. By contrast, an individual with the right temperament will continually look to buy under the market and, when that corner of their portfolio dedicated to the quality gold juniors is topped off, will look to continually upgrade at lower prices. Because they won't be chased out by the volatility, they'll still be there to collect the big profits as the endgame unfolds.

This is also why investing only with money you can afford to lose and still sleep well is so important. It assures you don't get over-emotional and greatly improves your odds of staying the course. And in the worst case that we are wrong and these stocks only head down to more or less a total wipeout, you might be discomforted, but you won't be put out of the house.

I guess what I am saying is that we have never made any bones about the volatile nature of these stocks. Please be clear on why you are buying them, and don't kid yourself into thinking they couldn't go down 50% even from here. They can. But we wouldn't be recommending them, or investing in them ourselves, if we didn't think this was a play that will blow the doors off almost any other investment you could be making just now.

Energy Chart of the Week

Public displays of hand wringing over America's dependence on foreign oil have become very popular, but little attention has been paid to how natural gas imports fit into the U.S. energy equation.

[click to enlarge]

Twenty years ago, the United States' natural gas production met nearly all domestic demand, but that is changing - and quickly.

The current situation is nowhere near as dire as America's predicament with oil supplies, of which 60% come from net imports. But the trend of imports making up a greater share of consumption is accelerating at a more rapid pace for "natty" than it is with crude oil. From 1985 to 2007, America's reliance on crude oil imports doubled, but its reliance on natural gas imports has nearly quadrupled.

Because the vast majority of natural gas imports come from Canada - normally considered a safe source of supply - little fuss has been made. If America has to buy more natural gas from its neighbor to the north, what's the big deal? They've been a steady supplier in the past, and it's not the sort of place where rebels run amuck blowing up pipelines, disrupting the supply chain (as has been the case in Mexico).

Under NAFTA's proportionality clause, Canada is bound to send 60% of its natural gas to the United States. The problem is that Canada's natural gas production is declining. Making a bad situation worse, the tar sands require huge amounts of natural gas to ramp up their heavy oil operations. Canadian winters aren't getting any warmer either, which - coupled with a growing population - has meant steady growth in Canada's natural gas consumption.

At recent debates, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have been arguing over who would be most qualified to tear up the NAFTA agreement. Lost in this storm of campaign rhetoric was Canada's response. "You might not want to renegotiate NAFTA if you knew how badly you need that oil and gas" was the message from Jim Flaherty, Canada's finance minister. The Canadian government would jump at any chance to wiggle out of NAFTA's proportionality clause, and a Democratic president might give them the opportunity.

The good news is that natural gas imports no longer arrive solely via the pipeline; they also arrive by ship through the emerging global market in liquefied natural gas (LNG). So the United States is not restricted to Canada when looking for natural gas supply, as it was even just twenty years ago. The bad news is that many of the biggest suppliers of LNG are located in the Middle East and Russia - precisely the regions that America wants to become less reliant on for its future energy needs.

[Ed. Note: Over coffee early this morning, I re-read the latest edition of the Casey Energy Speculator. In addition to a number of other excellent articles, it included a fascinating article on "run of river" energy projects, a "green" energy technology that has tremendous upside. It produces power from rivers, without damming them, and with relatively minor disturbance to the environment. The article includes two recommendations, one low risk, one high risk. If you are not yet a subscriber, learn more about giving it a trial run. ]

China Still Is Selling Us More and More

Bud Conrad took a break from his preparations for our sold-out Scottsdale Summit to send over the following chart he thought you would find of interest.

[click to enlarge]

There are a couple of take-aways from that chart, but the one that pops out at me is that it is a picture of American manufacturing being shipped overseas. As a result, while there is no question that a weakening dollar will help American manufacturers, the fact that their ranks have been reduced to such a degree, will likely mute the benefits.

Real Estate, Real Trouble

I ran into the mother of a close friend and a former partner at the store the other day. I don't think I would be exaggerating if I said she was the powerhouse real estate broker here in the resort town that is the headquarters of Casey Research. She is the quintessential über-agent, "can do," "get it done" and "never say die" kind of individual. Always an upbeat word about the local market and tough as nails, when needs to be, to get the sale. Yet, in our check-out conversation she made no bones about the fact that her views on the local real estate market are far less positive these days. In fact, her words were along the lines of, "I don't think that house prices are going to come back for another decade."

In a discussion on the topic of real estate with my mother, who holds down the family fort on the Big Island of Hawaii, she related a tale that I had heard before, but thought relevant to the current market, and so asked her to write down the facts of the case. Here they are:

"Grandpa bought a large house in August of 1929. The address was 10 Sutherland Road, Montclair, N.J. The price was about $45,000. He finally sold it for slightly less in 1945 after trying for years. I have an excellent photo of the house but can't send it until later today when (and if) I manage to reinstall another all-in-one with scanner. Love, Mom"

Could real estate really go down and stay down for 20 years? As hard as it seems to imagine, the answer is yes. This is a topic I'll have more on next week, when I share an interview with one of your fellow subscribers who is a professional real estate appraiser of many years and great experience from Northern California.

And That, Dear Readers, Is It for this Week...

I'm off tomorrow to our Scottsdale Summit. Next week's edition, written on the fly (literally) will likely be a bit reduced. The U.S. stock market is closed for Easter, but I can't even begin to imagine what thrills and chills it has for us next week.

We live in interesting times, indeed.

As always, thank you for taking time to read these hastily assembled thoughts... and, of course, for subscribing.

Warm regards,

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

The Room 3/17/08

David Galland — Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:33:53 GMT

Dear Reader,

You don't need me to tell you, but the $1,000 mark is the latest to fall beneath gold's mighty rise.

Even so, as a benchmark, the number $1,000 is meaningless. It represents no new high in the inflation-adjusted prices that count. And it is not attached to a magic switch that assures, once flipped, the price must subsequently march to the $1,200 forecasted for this year by our own Bud Conrad. (Who is now poking with his fork at the suspicious-looking meat resting on his dinner plate in China where he is visiting.)

Of course, decisively taking out the $1,000 level will, undoubtedly, result in yet more features in the mainstream media and cause yet more regret in the minds of those who have dumbly stood by while watching gold break through the whole numbers divisible by 100. In time, these factors will contribute to a mass migration towards the yellow metal.

But the real significance is one I briefly touched on in closing last week. To wit, so far this quarter, gold has consistently traded much higher than the average price received by the highly visible major gold producers in breaking the right sort of records last quarter.

A bit more detail...

In the fourth quarter of 2007, despite recent comments by certain less-than-attentive observers that the company was still hindered by hedges, Barrick Gold, the world's largest gold producer, was able to realize an average price of $799 per ounce of gold it sold. (That's actually about $10 higher than the average price that gold traded at during the quarter.)

Against those revenues, the company had an average cost per gold ounce sold of just $375, resulting in operating cash flow of some $748 million, better than double that from the previous quarter.

Now, let's jump ahead to some point in late April when Barrick releases its first quarter 2008 results. If prices hold at the average for the month to date, then the average price of gold for the quarter will ring in at $930, or $141 higher than the average price for the last quarter. Assuming no significant change in cost structures over the quarter, and assuming the same level of sales as last quarter, Barrick's first-quarter operating cash flow numbers will rise by another $300 million, pushing the total over the $1 billion mark for the first time in the company's history.

Repeat this record-breaking story pretty much across the industry (a story we continue to follow in more detail in BIG GOLD, which this month extends its analysis into big silver ... learn more) and you have a story that will tell very, very well when compared to the smoking holes that most sectors have left in the brokerage statements of their erstwhile adherents.

Waxing metaphorically, the herd is slow to move, but as the fire of crisis grows to the point where it is visible to all, the herd will move to the safety of gold. We'll be waiting.

The Best-Laid Plans

In recent commentaries, I have mentioned how it is that the fates of nations sometimes hinge on an accident or an unexpected event that renders the best-laid plans worthless, sometimes with catastrophic results. This week's honorable mentions go to...

Hillary Clinton. Recently we learned that the young girl who was at the heart of the most successful political ad of the season, the one showing her sleeping in the middle of the night and the phone ringing threateningly. As you may recall, the voice-over artist rhetorically asks a question along the lines of, "Who do you want to be there to answer it; youth, or that seasoned veteran of such things, "Ma Hil" herself?"

Given the wide acclaim the ad received, followed by two quick primary wins, I had thought Hil's reinvigorated efforts at doing in Mr. Obama had finally succeeded, and that, like the victim of an alley-way knife attack, he was stumbling toward his fate.

But all that changed when the girl, now a young woman, came forward and announced that she was, in fact, an ardent Obama supporter. And even worse for the ever-aspiring Mrs. Clinton, the young actress, perhaps hoping to expose her talents beyond feigning sleep, was only too happy to accept every opportunity to appear on various talk shows and, using her full dramatic range, to espouse the dim view she took of the Clintons' ad.

It is hard to say, yet, if this blunting of the Senator's momentum will prove the final stumbling block, but it very well could. One thing is for sure, voters in the remaining primary states won't be further swayed by that particular ad. And, so, perhaps, the history books will soon record Mr. Obama as the next president. Now some of you likely don't think that this is catastrophic, and I don't want to suggest it will be (though I can say that I am already no fan of his proposed changes in tax policy)... but if he does become president and his term in the highest office does turn out to be catastrophic, then historians may point to a sleeping girl when publishing dissertations that include "what if" scenarios.

The Beijing Olympics. While I haven't thoroughly researched the topic, general commentary has it that China is viewing the upcoming Beijing Olympics as a matter of some national pride... a "coming out" party of sorts, during which they shall display the country's many marvels for all the world to gawk at. Proof of how serious they are about making a good impression may be provided by the fact that they are moving entire industries in order to reduce the city's infamous pollution. And, in an attempt to outdo all others that have come before, they were even going to risk life itself to have the Olympic torch dragged up to the very top of the world... Mt. Everest.

But that may have been the one bridge too far, the misjudgment that catches the attention of the fickle finger. For, as you are probably aware, since 1951 cartographers have been obliged to include the north side of that formidable mountain on a map within the borders of China, and not the independent nation formerly known as Tibet which the Chinese overran in that year, causing some consternation among many, most vocally Richard Gere and his kindred spirits in Tibetan monkdom.

This week, we read that certain parts of Tibet are aflame, and that Chinese troops have moved in to provide the monks with some on-the-spot reeducation. While I can't know, I suspect the odds now favor things going from bad to worse for the Chinese Olympics. If I'm right, then next up we'll see the government of some country or another announce it will, in protest, not participate. It is not inconceivable, even, that the increasingly politically correct United States could bow to pressure to yank the yanks and who knows where things lead from there. I guess we'll have to read the history books to find out.

(When dealing with political topics, one should always tread cautiously. My references to President Obama are, of course, pure conjecture. Senator Clinton has shown herself to be a formidable opponent and so cannot be written off at this point. Likewise, while I continue to think the odds are long against McCain, even a victorious campaign by that elder songster is not out of the question. But forced to it at this point, I'd have to give the tip to Obama. And lest you might wonder which presidential aspirant I actually favor, I will go on record here as being firmly on board for "None of the Above.")

Geologists Rule!

You may have seen the article this week about the soaring demand for geologists, a story we have been following in the International Speculator for some years. The bottom line is that Canadian schools are now graduating just 1,200 geologists a year, which stacks up against demand for better than 9,000. (University programs for geology in the U.S. have all but disappeared in favor of courses related to saving the environment.)

As a result, the starting salary of a freshly turned-out geo now exceeds that earned by a similarly launched MBA by a fairly considerable margin.

While I am pleased as punch to see our hard-working friends in the business being so handsomely rewarded, there is a much more important point to be made here. Namely that with industry demand for geos now outstripping supply by more than 7.5 to 1, the logical move for the producers, which must continuously replace their depleting reserves, is to become increasingly more aggressive about acquiring the junior exploration companies, especially those topped off with good projects.

There is an old adage that says "The best place to find a mine is next to another mine." These days you might modify those pearls of wisdom by saying, "The best place to find your next mine is not by kicking a lot of rocks, but by scrolling through the 'Has Metal' ratings of the exploration stocks followed in our International Speculator." (Has Metal being how we indicate which of those companies we follow already have a significant discovery under their belt, and are, generally speaking, just waiting to sell it off to a major.)

In other words, while the producers can start from scratch and try to find the talent needed to discover their next major gold deposit, they will likely find it more efficient and time saving to simply buy up an exploration company that already has the goods. It is not too late to get positioned in those companies, but it soon will be.

[Warning - blatant pitch coming! Start now, and within a couple of minutes you'll be viewing the entire list of International Speculator "Has Metal" recommendations. It's as simple as taking us up on our fully guaranteed trial subscription offer.

If at any point during your first 3 months, you don't find the International Speculator to be worth every penny you pay, we'll refund all those pennies... so you have nothing to lose for giving it a try. Frankly, if you're not already a subscriber, I can't see why you wouldn't sign up today. Follow the link just below...

Click to Learn More About the 3-Month
International Speculator Trial Subscription]

Expert Reveals Wolves Pose No Danger to Sheep

This week I read with some amusement that Standard & Poor's had sounded the "all clear" signal, stating that the worst of the subprime crisis was over. Kevin Brekke, our Switzerland-based editor, came across a similar item earlier in the week and felt moved to write. Here it is...

If you were a hesitant sheep, alone in a field, at dusk, nervously scanning the shadows for anything resembling a pair of fangs or pointed ears, would that headline provide some comfort, some confidence, possibly lulling you into relaxing, letting your guard down, and munching on some tasty clover? Uh-huh, I thought so.

Well, then, how about this:

Economists See US Avoiding Recession
or this,

Experts' Forecast Sees No Recession
If you were a hesitant small investor, feeling alone and in the dark about the markets and the economy, nervously scanning the headlines for anything to help you protect your life's savings, would that headline provide some comfort, some confidence, possibly emboldening you to snap up some bargains in today's beaten-down stocks? And maybe buy some California real estate, and, heck, why not head over to Electronics World and see what's on sale?

Do you think that maybe that's the reaction those headlines were designed to trigger?

I must admit that, although suspect from the start, the headline got my attention. So I reviewed the article and guess what - the author had some other enlightening and insightful observations on the economy, such as:

The U.S. may experience negative growth for 1Q2008

Sluggish job growth for balance of '08

Housing doldrums to persist "for a very long time"

GDP growth for the year of 1.5%

Now, any reasonable person digesting this report, possessing but a modest degree of objectivity, could readily conclude that the author would only admit to what can't be denied - the current environment of bad to worsening conditions - and then supplement it with encouraging predictions of what is just a quarterly report or two away. And if the economy is to grow at an annual rate of 1.5%, with the first quarter likely to be around (or below) zero, then the next three quarters have some heavy lifting to accomplish, a scenario that looks increasingly unrealistic.

But a recession? No.

My point here is that the headline for this report could just as misleadingly have read:

Experts' Report Sees Negative First Quarter GDP
But then that headline doesn't have quite the same reassuring tone, now does it?

One editor's version of this story that hit the wires mentioned the author of this report was an academic and an economist. A quick Internet search of the author uncovered some "coincident indicators." The author is a Ph.D., graduated Princeton, a published academic, holds a university department chair, and is "a frequent visiting scholar at the International Monetary Fund and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System." Sound familiar?

As a random comparison, Ben Bernanke is a Ph.D., graduated Princeton, a published academic, held a university department chair, has contact with the IMF, and is the head of the Federal Reserve System. A coincidence?

A published yet obscure and mostly unknown economist writes a report and Wham! it hits the AP news wire and web pages like a topless photo of Paris Hilton. Now how do you suppose that happened? And who do you think shaped the headline?

With the number of vested interests intent on continuing with the status quo, the confidence game will be kept on life support for as long as needed, and by questionable means. The Fed, the dollar, our government, our banks, our economy, the markets, all rely on the confidence of those dependent on, and profiting from, more of the same. Numbers are fudged, statistics skewed, data manipulated, balance sheets doctored, news sanitized, and headlines managed. Backing and filling operations run around the clock to keep the façade of confidence intact.

The new realities we face will require more than scanning the headlines and watching a few minutes of BigFinancialChannel. Investors today, of all stripes, will need the vigilance to fully vet the information on which they base their investing decisions.

And that's exactly what we at Casey Research strive for every day. As it becomes increasingly difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff, and avoid getting the chaff, investors are supplementing their universe of ideas with the help of newsletter advisory services.

But for those stuck in the old paradigm, blind to the shifts occurring around them, well... Hey! Look over there, fellow mutton-chops. There's some juicy Google shares. Let's munch on those for the moment.

How You Know When the Economy Is in Trouble

This week the moving trucks pulled up in front of the offices of Carlyle Capital Corp, the publicly traded fund operated by the Carlyle Group. The trucks were sent in by the folks down the street at JPMorgan Chase & Co and Citigroup, among others, when Carlyle failed to meet $400 million in margin calls. The long and short was that they seized Carlyle's assets in an attempt to squeeze what remaining value was left in the firm, yet another victim of the ballooning credit crisis.

Now, in case you are unfamiliar with Carlyle, they may be the best-connected firm in the world, boasting a current or former board of directors and major investors that include a veritable Who's Who in the World.

Among the listed members, I found...

Former President Bush, former British Prime Minister John Major, Saudi Prince Al-Walid, George Soros, James Baker III, Colin Powell... the list literally goes on, and on.

These are, without exaggeration, among the most powerful people in the world. So why would the major NY banks, which owe so much of their success to their political connections, engage in such a distinctly unfriendly act as calling in the $400 million and, by doing so, essentially torpedo Carlyle's fund beneath the water line?

All I can come up with is that this is a sign of the deep, deep trouble these and other institutions are in. While the heirs of JPMorgan's carefully built empire may horribly regret the limited choices left to them, the knowledge that there are only a limited number of seats left in the life boat has guided them in their decision, I believe, to place a firm hand on the expensively coiffed head of Carlyle and shove it underwater in the scramble for safety.

David Rubenstein, a principal in Carlyle, sat for an interview with Bloomberg, in which, they report, he was heard to say...

"We have made a lot of money with, and for, these banks and this is a hiccup in a 20-year relationship. We don't think any of them have any animus [sic] toward us and we're not antagonistic toward them."

Using our top secret Casey Quote Translator, Model X-III, we uncover that what Mr. Rubenstein was actually saying was...

"The ingrates, how dare they! Who do they think they are messing with? Oh, boy, oh boy, just wait until the next time the bastards want something from the government, any government, then we'll make them pay! YOU HEAR ME! IT WILL BE NOTHING BUT DARKNESS AND PAIN!!"

Watch out below...

Are You a Skeptic?

Doug Hornig, who edits our Daily Resource PLUS, sent in the following item that I thought instructive and worth sharing...

It occurs to me that Internet credibility is a subject of interest that might fit in the Room sometime, or Doug's End Notes in the International Speculator. We've become so conditioned to getting information from the Net that it can interfere with our good common sense and healthy skepticism. That's why I always keep Snopes.com close to hand.

Case in point: there's an email currently making the rounds. I got it from a mutual friend. Now I love the guy and respect him quite a lot, but we do disagree on some topics about which I find him, well, myopic. He will, it seems, believe anything that supports his view of the terrorist threat or trashes liberals. Thus he sent me a related email, from which I excerpt the following:
This week, the University of Kentucky removed The Holocaust from its school curriculum because it "offended" the Muslim population which claims it never occurred.

This is a frightening portent of the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is giving into it.

Now, that seemed unlikely to me. I don't know much about Kentucky, except that they usually have a terrific basketball team, but I couldn't imagine that a major American university would do such an absurd thing. So I went to Snopes and found that, of course, I was right to be skeptical. It's a hoax.

What's especially fun in this case is how the hoax evolved. It's a bit like the old game of Telephone. The story got started when the history department in one small school in northern Britain (the UK) did in fact stop teaching the Holocaust. Someone picked that up and started the rumor that the same thing applied to all UK schools. Then some moron saw that story, thought that UK meant University of Kentucky, and started spreading that rumor.

So, as always with the Net, caveat emptor.

David again.

I would extend Doug's comments to include being skeptical about your sources of information. I have to bite my cheek when I travel around the web world looking at precious metals-related content, and come across ads for various information services being offered by people that I know for a fact have next to no knowledge on the topic, but have only just opportunistically jumped onto the bandwagon. Even worse, there are any number of such services being promoted by people paid to tout the stocks they wax so poetically about. I grit my teeth, wanting to write articles here naming names and pointing fingers, but resist... because who needs the legal hassle.

But, as you are skeptical about stories you receive in emails, so should you be skeptical about the information services you choose to help guide you in your investing.

New Trend: The End of Printed Books

While it dates me, I can still remember the smell that emanated from the very first fax machines. And the joy of being able to move from a manual typewriter to an IBM Selectric.

Even more telling, I can recall, having been involved in a business requiring printing, slogging down to the typesetters and watching as they arranged lead type into frames in preparation for printing.

I remember 8-track audio tapes and know that my children will look back in the future and similarly remember VHS and cassette tapes in much the same way.

What's next? Say goodbye to printed books...

With Amazon's über-successful launch of the Kindle electronic book reader leading the way, and showing the way... coupled with the increased environmental sensibilities now gripping the minds of humanity, the idea of cutting down forests to fill libraries is an idea whose time has passed.

Especially when you consider that, with Kindle, you can actually download full-length books, wirelessly, from pretty much anywhere, in less than a minute. Now nobody loves a proper book more than I, but the idea of loading up your reading device with the latest book you want to read while nestled comfortably in your chair, or while waiting in the airport for yet another delayed fight, is pretty appealing.

Finish the first book in a series and want to go right on to the next? Click and you are good to go.

And further iterations of the readers are now inevitable, given the demonstration of solid market demand. For instance, you could sign up to automatically receive notification that the latest books by your favorite authors are now available.

In short, I think the book readers are here to stay and will soon dominate, leading to the demise of all but art books.

What are the consequences of this shift? For starters, there is probably a big opportunity coming for whichever company captures the space. At this point, Amazon and Sony are in the lead, but it could easily be some other company that takes the lead (never count out Microsoft or Google when it comes to this sort of thing). It could bring the cost of books down.

Of course, on the downside, traditional book printers will need to change or die.

In time, of course, we'll somehow see this feature built into an all-in-one device (phone, Internet, book reader)... but I think that is some years away because no one wants to read a book on a tiny screen.

For the heck of it, if you have any thoughts on how an investor might play the end of traditional books (or wish to disagree with my hypothesis), drop me a line at david@caseyresearch.com and I'll publish the best ideas.

(Since we're on the topic of personal communication technology, going on nothing other than a couple of ads I have seen during my rare viewing of commercial television, I would say that Sprint is in trouble. They are heavily advertising a two-for-one deal on a phone that looks like some cheap toy. Its primary feature seems to be a slide-out keyboard that allows you to type in small type on a tiny black and white screen... a sign that the company is well out of touch with the times, if you ask me.)

End Notes

I have another 10 pages of notes, but less time than required to do them justice, so I will summarize some of the other items that caught my eye this week...

* Making the World a Safer Place. The Consumer Product Safety Commission is being revamped, restaffed and its funding boosted. As part of this new initiative, the cap on fines that the agency can now levy against companies failing to report product hazards will rise from $1.8 million to as much as $20 million, if the Senate bill passes. Using standard operating procedure on these things, Senator Pryor, the bill's sponsor, commented, "The vote is a victory for the health and safety of children."

About time, some will say. Just more regulation and more burden on U.S. manufacturers, I say. When was the last time you or someone you know was hurt by a faulty product?

* Running out of gold. I came across some interesting comments this week by Kevin McArthur of Goldcorp. Here's an excerpt of his remarks...

Goldcorp Inc expects the price of gold to top $1,000 an ounce and stay there for a long time, a development that will allow the company to improve operating margins, Chief Executive Kevin McArthur said on Monday.

In a wide-ranging interview at the Reuters Global Mining Summit, McArthur, who is also president of the Canadian gold producer, said he thinks the price of gold, which was at $973 an ounce on Monday, is not "anywhere near a bubble."

"We are not replacing the reserves that we're mining, and yet demand continues to grow worldwide. We're going to run out of gold," he said of the global gold industry.

* Derivatives Next? The good folks at moneywatch.com had an interesting article discussing Warren Buffett's dim view of the size and scope of derivatives, and postulating that if that bubble starts to deflate, things will go from catastrophic to, well... whatever is two or three times catastrophic. The author, Paul Farrell, kindly provides the latest data from the Bank of International Settlements to illustrate just how big the derivatives bubble, now at $516 trillion, really is...

U.S. annual gross domestic product is about $15 trillion
U.S. money supply is also about $15 trillion
Current proposed U.S. federal budget is $3 trillion
U.S. government's maximum legal debt is $9 trillion
U.S. mutual fund companies manage about $12 trillion
World's GDP for all nations is approximately $50 trillion
Unfunded Social Security and Medicare benefits $50 trillion to $65 trillion
Total value of the world's real estate is estimated at about $75 trillion
Total value of world's stock and bond markets is more than $100 trillion
BIS valuation of world's derivatives back in 2002 was about $100 trillion
BIS 2007 valuation of the world's derivatives is now a whopping $516 trillion

* Bank Runs... Dust Bowls Next? My somewhat more pessimistic partner, Doug Casey, wrote again over night that... "The only thing I'm actually pretty sure about is that we're in for the biggest economic/social/financial/political upheaval ever." For those of you aware of Doug's solid record in forecasting these sorts of things, those are words worth noting.

Along those lines, this week we learned that foreclosures in the U.S. had jumped by 60% in February, and bank seizures doubled (a category that now includes the snowboard shop down the street).

Further evidence that this downturn is taking a turn towards Doug's point of view, I came across two items of interest.

The first had to do with a long line-up that formed outside of the Boca Raton Housing Authority when that institution offered up housing vouchers. The scene turned ugly, requiring the services of the local constabulary which these days arrives dressed as if going to war. You can view the photos here... and to keep your finger on the pulse, you should. If you have a similar reaction as I did, you may get a creeping feeling on the back of your neck.

The second involves a tent city that the city of Ontario, California set up in a field at its airport last year, an attempt to help out the area's homeless. The tent city has now expanded from 20 residents to over 250, with many, many more trying to get in. The local government is unsure what to do from here, and so is trying to reduce the influx by letting in only those with some sort of identification proving they are from the area. Where does it lead? Where does it end? I don't know. Photos here.

* Flat Tax... Hah! Years ago, I had lunch with Donald Alexander, who had then just retired as the head of the Treasury. During our lunch, the much younger version of myself asked him "Hey, didn't the American Revolution start over the issue of taxation without representation? Well, my generation never got to vote on income tax, what are the odds of a do-over?" At which point, I remember him dismissively waiving his hand and commenting with something that I recall as disdain, "You're all wet."

While I still like that idea of a re-vote, I'm not holding my breath. Instead, as discussed last week, I'd happily settle for a 10% flat tax. But this week, we learn that if either of the democratic contenders come into power, taxes will be anything but flat. In fact, according to Bloomberg...

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama both propose significant changes to the tax code that would add to its complexity. His plan emphasizes income inequality, while hers seeks to change Americans' behavior.

Obama's proposal would shift the tax burden toward the rich from low- and middle-income workers. Clinton proposes targeted tax breaks designed to change the way Americans use energy, save money and care for elders.

Obama, 46, "seems to have focused on redistribution," said Michael Graetz, a professor at Yale Law School in New Haven, Connecticut, and a former Treasury official.

Clinton, 60, "is proposing tax credits for everything short of flossing your teeth," said Lee Sheppard, a tax lawyer and columnist at Tax Analysts in Falls Church, Virginia.

The two candidates' plans -- especially Clinton's -- would further complicate a tax system that experts say is already Byzantine. Obama would tweak and augment current laws, while Clinton would introduce even more rules by adding at least nine new credits with complex qualification requirements, phase-outs and sliding scales.

And That's It for This Week...

Sorry to have gone on so long, once again, especially after my comments last week about tightening things up. But we live in a very busy world just now.

As I often like to do, a quick check of the screens as I wrap up shows me that gold is holding strong at $999 and the U.S. stock market is, once again, getting hammered... with the DJIA down 235 points, erasing the misplaced optimism that briefly flared after the Fed's $200 billion gambit to trick the markets earlier this week.

I came across a blog earlier in the week that was kind of sad. It was populated by day trader types, every one of them lamenting about the personal pain they had suffered by jumping back into the financials prematurely. As they told it, they each had figured things just couldn't get any worse... only to learn the hard way that, yes, they could. Elsewhere, I read the views of a pundit, whose name now escapes me, that earlier this week would have been a good time to buy Bear Stearns because, according to him, the company was, despite appearances, a picture of health. At one point today, the market disagreed so vehemently with his advice that it sent the shares of the wounded Bear down a record 53%.

And they say gold is risky.

That's it for now. Until next week, thank you for reading...

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

The Room 3/10/08

David Galland — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:16:14 GMT

Dear Fellow Global Adventurers,

This past week I came across worthy comments from Dr. Marc Faber of the Gloom, Boom & Doom Report in which he comments that, by continuing to cut interest rates, Bernanke will eventually "destroy the U.S. dollar."

If Bloomberg is reporting accurately, and I see no immediate reason in this case to doubt them, Dr. Faber also said...

In the U.S., they pursue essentially economic policies that target consumption, which in my opinion is misguided. They should pursue economic policies that stimulate capital investment and capital formation.

We share Dr. Faber's sentiments on the outlook for the dollar. And his thoughts on how to solve the many challenges facing the U.S. economy resonate with us here at Casey Research, as well.

The fly in this otherwise pleasant and lightly scented ointment, however, is that -- thanks to the nature of democracy and even humanity's shared psychology -- Bernanke is powerless to take Marc up on his common-sense recommendation. In my opinion, the Fed is left with no course of action but to destroy the dollar.

I say that due to the mechanical aspects of Marc's suggestion. You see, in order for the government to stimulate capital investment and capital formation, it would have to greatly reduce the weight of its own dead hand on businesses and individuals.

There is a saying that capital flows to where it is best treated, the veracity of which can be proven by considering that on the order of 25% of the world's construction cranes are currently deployed in Dubai. And that city has no real resources of its own; it's located in the most geopolitically unstable corner of the globe, and has a physical climate that is measured only in terms of hot, really hot, and even hotter.

Properly restructured, the U.S. could, at the risk of sounding nationalistic, kick Dubai's butt. And China's as well.

After all, while many of the world's economic observers fawn over China's remarkable progress, the facts are simple. (a) The U.S. already has the infrastructure in place that China is now trying to build; (b) China is run by a cadre of corrupt communist comrades, not exactly a model ripe for emulation by a thinking person; (c) they have over a billion mouths to feed. Which is to say, any setbacks that cause the aspirations of its large public to be disappointed could result in social unrest and worse. (The rocketing cost of rice, up almost 100% over the last year, may be a catalyst for such unrest.)

Adding to the discomfort about the potential consequences of social unrest, one only needs to glance casually into the cupboard to find tightly packed examples of the culture's apparent disdain for steadily beating hearts.

Reaching into said cupboard, we pick up Barbara Tuchman's excellent Stillwell and the American Experience in China to read her accounts of General "Vinegar Joe" Stillwell's arrival in that country in the support of Chiang Kai-Shek, as despicable a two-legged creature ever to have wandered onto the human stage. In between other duties, Joe had to restrain himself, and his men, from opening fire on officers of Mr. Kai-Shek's nationalist army that would routinely punish the loss of even so much as a single lice-ridden blanket by a foot soldier with summary execution.

But as degraded as Chiang and his fellows were, they were nothing compared to the big guy himself. Based on readings on the topic, confirmed with an airplane seat consultation with an academic who had made the study of such things his life's work, Chairman Mao was reliably responsible for the unnatural deaths of over 50,000,000 of his fellow countrymen.

I digress.

Returning to my theme, the U.S. has everything it needs to be more than competitive on the global stage. All that needs fixing, really, is to eliminate the single largest obstacle to capital formation, the heavy weight of government. To be metaphoric, it is hard enough to successfully climb the mountain of capitalist endeavor -- having to do it with a large sack of rocks weighing on your spine greatly reduces the odds of success.

There are many ways that this reduction in the weight of government could be accomplished. A well-timed nuclear backpack going off in the nation's capital pops to mind. But such a solution would only be temporary and would lead, unquestionably, to a Hydra-like regeneration of even more and bigger government in its place.

No, the far better approach would be to put the institution on a strict regime. To treat the government the way a heartless physical fitness coach might, whose lunch money is entirely dependent on his client losing all but the essential ratio of body fat.

Personally, I can see no better way of getting right down to it than by anchoring spending by reinstituting a gold standard, then tossing out the entire tax code in favor of a level tax of 10%. (With the amount of wealth that would be created, forgiving even that burden for the true unfortunates would be of no fiscal consequence.)

In addition to providing a welcoming home for capital, among the many other advantages of making these moves, would be; (a) the elimination of the Fed. With no need to "manage" the currency, their disastrous reign over the world's money supply would come to a quick end; (b) the elimination of the horrible waste and costs associated with tax preparation, estimated to be a minimum of $150 billion a year, before taking into account all the personal time and worries that go into the current process; and (c) the government would be forced to be far more selective in its pursuits and to curb its unceasing expansion plans.

Making a necessarily loose calculation and using the current economy for same, a gold standard and flat tax together would require the government to live with a budget of about $1.38 trillion per year, requiring a substantial reduction in the $3.1 trillion it is projected to burn up in 2008.

But the reality would be not quite so stark, as the tax receipts would soar in the new economy as the world beat a path to set up to do business in the U.S.

There's just one problem with that practical, though utopian, view.

Which brings us back to the nature of democracy and the psychology of humankind. While the votetariat may talk a good game, when it comes right down to it, the majority is interested in seeing its favorite uncle not spend less but more.

More on health care. More on fighting global warming (or cooling, whichever idea has the most traction at the moment). More on bailing out subprime borrowers and lenders alike. More on the social security net. More on FDA inspections, more on financial regulation, more on building bridges and more on commissions to study the drug habits of professional athletes. Some want more money for Homeland Security and war, others want more money for foreign aid to this or that country or to protect pygmy elephants as they meander through dark jungles on the other side of the world.

Not very long ago, my own dear mother provided illumination on the topic when she told me that she, who had been a big Ron Paul supporter, had retracted her support after hearing him comment to the effect that he would, as she put it, "eliminate my Social Security."

And there's something else. The Germans have a word, Schadenfreude, which loosely translated means taking pleasure at seeing others fail. The tightly linked obverse of that sentiment is that we take umbrage when someone succeeds a bit too much.

Consider the indignation in some circles at Bush's "tax cuts for the rich"... tax cuts that will almost certainly fade away into the darkening horizon as the next administration comes to power.

But tax cuts for the rich... or, more accurately, those who aspire to wealth and succeed in gaining same, is exactly what the country needs to power through the looming crisis.

What the country doesn't need, really, is to keep depreciating the currency. What will it take for the average voter to wake up to the reality that the U.S. dollar has lost 81% of its value since its link to gold was cut in 1971?

If things continue on the current flight path, which is pretty much headed straight at the ground, we may soon find out.

The Right Way to Look at the U.S. Economy Today

[click to enlarge]

In the lead article of our December 2006 International Speculator ("Users Guide to Fiscal Calamity", view archives) we pointed out that the 20-year bubble in financial assets was only temporarily and lightly deflated in 2000, as the Fed's money pumping shifted the asset bubble to the housing market.

As a consequence, going into the current crisis, the long bubble was not only intact but larger than ever.

In the wee hours this morning, in between arranging his shirts and socks for a 6:30 am departure for a look-around of China, our own Bud Conrad somehow found the time to throw together the chart above, updating the data on the asset bubble.

If you step back from the chart, squint at it slightly, and use the power of your mind to add the two lines together, one representing equities, and the other housing... then mentally assign a net asset value to both... what you come up with is a clear road sign that the bubble still has a long way to go in a collapse, and that the collapse has begun.

Confirming that point, as I was writing this, the news came across the screen that U.S. payrolls contracted again in February, the second month in a row, and the most in five years. Understandably, the stock market is again in a free fall.

This is all but a continuum at this point. Yesterday, for instance, we learned that, collectively, the equity in American homes is now less than the debt owed on those homes. This is the first time this has ever occurred, or at least since the Fed started tracking that data in 1945. It is no wonder, therefore, that foreclosures and "walk-aways" are also breaking all the wrong records.

Rushing about trying to keep the wall from collapsing on top of the economy, the Fed announced today that it will further ramp up the largely indiscriminate, cut-rate lending it is making available to the banks, indicating that any hopes for a more intelligent approach to sorting things out will go unfulfilled.

Desperate Acts - Continued

On the topic of desperate acts, in recent editions of these musings, I have pointed to attempts by the bureaucrats to maintain the status quo by paying off bank employees in tax havens for client lists, selling off state lotteries and closing parks, etc.

On that general theme, this week provided additional examples:

The first entry is from Jubak's Journal, which appears regularly, it seems, on MSNMoney.com...

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., the government agency that protects the pensions of 44 million workers in case their employers can't (or won't) pay promised benefits, has announced that to avoid going bust it will double the percentage of its portfolio -- to 45% -- that it puts into stocks. An additional 10% will go into alternative investments, including hedge funds.

In other words, facing a $14 billion deficit and even larger projected shortfalls, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., or PBGC, decided not to save (by raising premiums) or to live within its means (by cutting benefits) but to gamble in the financial markets by taking on more risk. The PBGC was so proud of its new strategy that it announced it on Presidents Day, when the U.S. financial markets were closed and almost no one was paying attention.

While Mr. Jubak is to be thanked for bringing a little levity into the day, his indignation misses a key point. It's not as if they are actually betting with their own money. Even a complete wipe-out of the organization's remaining capital would be papered over with a quick press release that the government has had to step in and bail it out. People will shrug off the news, if they even notice it, as just another billion here, a billion there.

Unlike them, I view these billions as just more bricks in an increasingly rotted and dangerously tipping wall.

The second item comes from Bloomberg...

Jefferson County, Alabama, in a move that may cost it $184 million, said it wouldn't pledge reserves against $5.4 billion of interest-rate swaps tied to sewer debt that its bankers may demand.

...The county, which includes Birmingham, confronted a March 7 deadline to put up the $184 million in collateral or buy insurance to meet its obligations to JPMorgan Chase & Co. and three other banks on 13 swaps after S&P and Moody's Investors Service began downgrading the sewer debt last week.

"The county commission faces difficult decisions on the sewer system debt. However, these decisions will not be made at the expense of the county's employees," Jefferson County Commission President Bettye Fine Collins wrote in a memo to the workers.

I love Bettye's unusual candor... no question where her loyalty rests. Destroy the county's credit rating? Blow off $184 million? No sweat. But cause any expense or discomfort to the county's employees, no way.

Energy Chart of the Week

Last year showed both the promise, and the problem, with liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports to the United States.

[click to enlarge]

The promise is that rising LNG imports will offset dwindling natural gas imports coming down the pipe from Canada. Alberta, especially, will consume a much greater proportion of its own natural gas production to extract and upgrade their massive tar sands resources. With an emerging global market in LNG, a drop-off in regional supply shouldn't matter, or so the conventional thinking goes.

The problem is that the rest of the world is clambering for LNG as well - and they're willing to pay higher prices for it. In the first half of 2007, the U.S. was able to track down a number of cargos and imported a record amount of LNG. Then, a minor earthquake forced the Japanese to shut down a nuclear plant, and they had to rely on natural gas-fired power plants to make up the shortfall. In their desperation, Japan outbid nearly everyone for LNG cargos, and U.S. LNG imports plummeted. There was no sense in paying $12/MMBTU for LNG, when natural gas in North America cost nearly half that.

There are five regasification terminals for LNG in the Lower 48 and lately two of them have been sitting idle. LNG imports are still very low in the beginning of 2008. Last year, LNG imports averaged 45 Bcf per month, but in the first two months of 2008, that's down to 21 Bcf per month. Discouraging news for consortiums working to build more of these very expensive and very controversial regasification LNG terminals.

The wild fluctuations in LNG imports to the U.S. in 2007 demonstrated that until prices within North America go much higher, the U.S. will not participate in the global LNG market. The idea that LNG will flood the U.S. natural gas market with new supply and keep down prices is ludicrous.

North American natural gas prices will rise - as they have been for the entire decade - until it makes economic sense to go out and compete with the likes of Japan, Spain and others for expensive LNG cargos. By keeping an eye on LNG prices, we can gauge where domestic prices are headed. LNG prices are, in that sense, a leading indicator of domestic natural gas prices ¬- and, with the inevitable corrections along the way, they point to a future with natural gas prices of well over $10.

[Ed. Note: On behalf of subscribers, the team at the Casey Energy Speculator, which includes Dr. Marc Bustin, by well-deserved reputation one of the world's top unconventional oil & gas specialists, have been very closely watching the natural gas sector, including developments with LNG. If you want to know what they know, and their latest recommendations to profit, simply take the monthly service (complete with weekly online updates) for a test drive today. An unquestioning 3-month, 100% money-back guarantee assures your satisfaction. Check it out now.]

Bootstrapping It

Were you to place the America of today on a scale with the America of yesteryear, there are a number of measures by which the current model would fall short. At least if I was the one doing the weighing.

Consider, for instance, that in his time, which was the early 20th century, H.L. Mencken was, by a wide margin, the most popular newspaper columnist in the land.

For those of you who haven't yet had the pleasure of reading his writings, I would suggest you run, not walk to the nearest book store to pick up a collection. My personal favorite is the Vintage Mencken as assembled by Alistair Cooke.

Meanwhile, to tide you over, here are a couple of a multitude of his many quotable quotes...

"In the United States, doing good has come to be, like patriotism, a favorite device of persons with something to sell."

"It is inaccurate to say that I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty, and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible for public office."

There was another author from earlier times, one Horatio Alger, Jr., who was wildly popular in the 19th century based on his many dime story novels, mainly about scrappy lads who managed through honesty and hard work to fight their way out of poverty and into the proverbial mansion on a well-sited hill. (That he had a base predilection for the same scrappy lads failed to dent his popularity, it seems.)

This comes to mind because of an article Doug Casey thought you might enjoy. It is the story of a young man with everything, who decides to test the American dream by dropping out of his usual society, ignoring his material advantages, and with just $25, to try and attain some modest level of financial stability.

While some of you may be tempted, after reading the article, to catalogue the various reasons why the young man was a success, while others less fortunate at birth would be doomed to fail, I think the mere act of making that catalogue is wrong-headed. What the world needs these days, in my view, is a lot more of the "can do" attitude, and a whole lot less of the helpless victim mentality that so unprofitably grips the minds of such large swaths of current society.

In any event, here's the story...

Eye on Liechtenstein

Kevin Brekke, our Switzerland-based editor, has been helping us keep an eye on the developments in Liechtenstein, a canary in the coal mine, as far as we are concerned, for the outlook for financial privacy. Here's his latest report...

Hey David,

Well, as the news cycle exerts its influence on the Liechtenstein Event, like gravity it has pulled the story from the front page, to the back page, to off the page. But here's what we know (or what the media would have us think we know) as of Thursday, 6 Feb:

In true fascist government style, German politicians were clamoring for microphones and face time in front of the cameras to pound their collective chests with, as one newspaper caption put it, "true pride in their actions." I guess in Germany under the Merkel & Co. regime, coercion, bribery, and buying stolen property is considered praiseworthy. In any case, it was announced that close to 200 Germans had come forward and were cooperating with the tax authorities.

The scope of interest has also been revealed to encompass not just bank accounts in Liechtenstein, but also family and company trusts, and safe deposit boxes. The tax authorities were quite clear in their charge that anyone with cash in a foreign bank safety deposit box must be doing something illegal. Apparently being in possession of your own money outside your home country confers upon the citizen a verdict of guilty - guilty of what we don't know, but guilty nonetheless. And besides, it's so much more profitable and expedient to exercise habeus grabus than to ask questions and uncover the facts.

Not surprising was the piling-on of other socialist countries drooling to get their hands on a piece of this action. Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Sweden, Great Britain, Ireland, and of course France, all expressed keen interest and deep concern to expose their own tax miscreants in the pursuit of "social justice." So pathetically desperate is Britain that their tax minister has announced that they will pay 100,000 pounds for a similar DVD with the names of British account holders.

In all fairness, there was a bright spot in this otherwise dark episode. A few clearer heads managed to elbow their way to the mic and interject some legal and ethical ponderings upon the shouting mob, er, the media. Sweden and Great Britain said that although they will pursue individuals to recoup tax revenue, they would likely not be able to bring criminal charges to bear, as the information was obtained via a crime - theft. Oh, those pesky details. The standouts so far have been Finland and Denmark. They took the argument further by saying that the theft of goods should not be rewarded - it's neither ethical nor legal.

More as it develops...

And That's It for This Edition...

It is an absolutely stunning day outside, and I swore to our production team that I would get this missive to them early, so I am going to line up both of those objectives and sign off now.

But first, a couple of quick housekeeping announcements.

Our Casey Research Crisis & Opportunity Summit is completely sold out. If you happen to come across a link to the event, please ignore it because we simply won't take any more registrations.
Based on subscriber feedback, we are going to re-double our efforts to tighten up the length of our monthly publications to no more than 24 pages. That said, knowing how prolific our team is, I suspect you'll be receiving additional special reports in between editions on topics that catch their collective eyes and that benefit from more in-depth exposition.

As is my custom, a quick check of the screen reveals that gold is hovering around $975, which is almost $200 higher than the average realized price of gold sold by Kinross Gold and other producers in producing their highly profitable Q407 financial results (to wit, the next quarterlies will only be better).

I also see that the DJIA has broken fairly decisively below the 12,000 benchmark. It's going lower.

Until next week... thank you very much for reading.

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

The Room 3/3/08

David Galland — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:52:08 GMT

Dear Readers,

It's getting to the point where even the most determined optimist is having a hard time finding a good reason to roll out of bed.

Among just the smattering of news that crossed the lens this week...

Producer prices rose 7.4 percent in January from a year ago, coming on the heels of the news last week that the Comedic Politicized Inflation (CPI) index has risen over the last 12 months at the highest year-over-year rate in decades.
The National Association of Purchasing Management's business barometer has fallen to the lowest level since 2001, beginning to reflect a knock-on slowdown in consumer spending.
And, according to the U.S. Commerce Department today, what modest growth in spending there is, is now coming from inflation and not from confident consumers mobbing local electronics shops to load up on the latest and greatest.
On that latter point, consumer confidence in the U.S. is reliably reported to have grabbed its chest and slumped to the ground, or at least to levels last seen only in 1992.

And no wonder, given that housing prices, the single most important component of the net worth of so many people, are crashing; in December they fell by the most on record, off 9.1% from the year before.

(During a cross-country ski slog over the weekend, a friend who is a housing contractor by trade told me he has not seen a slowdown like this in his 20 years in the business. He knows of only one new house on the flight path to be built in these parts. The property holder has six different contractors scraping it out in a bidding war to get the job, assuring that the victor ultimately receives as a reward a dry and meatless bone at best.)

If the housing sector slowdown with its rising foreclosures and defaults isn't enough to keep our optimist abed, he would have to do no more than flick on the morning news to learn of soaring food prices, a crashing dollar and a tumbling stock market.

No sooner had a trembling hand secured a double dose of Advil, topped off with a cold compress, then he would hear a report of hundreds of millions and maybe even billions of dollars worth of new and unexpected losses being suffered by municipalities, banks, and sundry financial institutions on purportedly "safe" instruments concocted in earlier, more positive times. This week, for instance, we hear that the supposedly invincible Goldman Sachs may take it in the chops for as much as $11 billion due to "variable interest entities," a form of conduit, our faltering optimist learns as he falls back on his pillow in a fatalistic swoon, that holds close to $800 billion in assets, some significant percentage of which are now considered suspect.

At this point, the only folks able to view the unfolding carnage with any casualness are the super-rich for whom almost any conceivable loss would still leave them the requisite funds to live like the royalty of old... and the relatively small handful of investors who've been smart enough to have moved assets out of harm's way and into gold and other commodities early on (a group that I continue to hope includes you, with the help of our various services).

Interestingly, this week it was revealed that the California Public Employees' Retirement System can be counted among the few that have been seeing the nature of the unfolding crisis in the right light, and has at least begun to act appropriately. Calpers, according to Bloomberg...

...the largest U.S. pension fund, may increase its commodities investments 16-fold to $7.2 billion through 2010 as raw materials prices surge to records.

Calpers, which has about $240 billion in assets, agreed at a Feb. 19 board meeting to hold between 0.5 percent and 3 percent of its assets in commodities, spokesman Clark McKinley said. The Sacramento, California-based fund last year put $450 million into commodities, its first such investment.

The agreement is the fruit of Chief Investment Officer Russell Read's efforts since joining in 2006 to boost returns by shifting funds into raw materials and markets such as China and India. Oil has soared above $100 a barrel, wheat breached $13 a bushel for the first time, and gold and platinum climbed to the highest ever since Calpers began investing in commodities.

"We plan on ramping up the program by hiring additional staff," McKinley said by phone yesterday. "We are excited about commodities, which have performed exceptionally well for us."

To which we say, welcome aboard! Better late than never, so hats off to the obviously competent Mr. Read.

Of course, as the pension funds, like the hedge funds, mutual funds and institutional funds in general tend to run in packs, this news can only help solidify the base under our current favorite investments.

Listen and you can almost hear the chat around the polished-wood-encased water coolers strategically positioned around finely appointed pension managers' offices worldwide.

"Did you hear, Calpers got into commodities last year?"

"Yeah, smart buggers. And here we are with our bonuses slashed -- slashed, I say! -- to only $2 million, just because we invested in AAA bonds!"

"Well, if commodities are good enough for Calpers, who are we to argue, eh?"

"Race you to the trading desk!"

Pile on in, we shout enthusiastically, daydreaming about selling our appreciated resource stocks to the stampeding herd a ways down the road.

But that, fellow travelers, is about the only golden lining to be found in the chaos now gripping the world. And while a good investment brings a warmth not unlike a crackling fire and a hot toddy on a cold day, the toddy loses much of its flavor when one considers the impact that the unfolding crisis will have on our less well-prepared friends, family and fellow countrymen (and women, as the case may be).

Commenting on the news in an email exchange from New Zealand this morning, Doug Casey had this to say...

"My own feeling is that by the time this cycle is over, people are going to be shocked by how high gold goes. But it will be a sideshow compared to the circus the Greater Depression will put on."

Unfortunately, however, the news for the unprepared gets much, much worse. There are two areas that I would like to comment on in a bit more depth, starting with Bernanke's testimony.

Bernanke Pushes the Button

Yesterday, while engaged in my periodic physical exertions, or more specifically, while I was clinging to the handles of a medieval masochistic device sternly labeled the "Stair Master" down at the local facility for such things, I managed to snake out a finger to the television monitor to tune into Chairman Ben's testimony in front the House Financial Services Committee.

It was, I noticed when the camera pulled back from Bernanke's oddly detached countenance, a sparsely attended affair. In fact, it seemed to my sweat-filled eyes as if there were no more than five or so members of elected officialdom in the gilded chamber.

(But, hey, why should members of Congress be interested in anything to do with the economy? It's not like there's anything going on these days. Whether or not Roger Clemens is doping - now THAT is worth packing the chambers for!)

In all seriousness, however, Bernanke's testimony yesterday was far more important than most people understand, least of all those now doing "service" in government. Far be it from me to be critical of the pandering class, but I was appalled at how unbelievably, well, stupid the questions were that were pushed toward Bernanke by the handful of Congressmorons who bothered skipping the brunch put on by the American Lawyers Association down the hall in order to be present.

Bernanke's testimony was important because in it he made it abundantly clear that the Fed - and by extension the U.S. government - was coming down firmly on the side of inflation.

Those of you who have been with us for any length of time know that we have been calling for things to arrive at a location loosely identified as "between a rock and a hard place." It has been our consistent belief that the Fed would inevitably be forced to make a decision between letting the economy collapse under the weight of its many debts and obligations, or letting the dollar collapse by shifting into default mode. Which is to say, trying to inflate the country out of trouble.

The specific quote from Bernanke's testimony you want to pay attention to was this...

"The Federal Open Market Committee will be carefully evaluating incoming information bearing on the economic outlook and will act in a timely manner as needed to support growth and to provide adequate insurance against downside risks."

Note the lack of reference to run-away-inflation that is already making itself known here, there and everywhere.

The news that the Fed is again opting for inflation, while coming as no surprise to us, caught the gold bears flat-footed by sending gold sharply higher, to over $970 as I write.

Speaking from an entirely personal basis, I am, of course, cheered by the rise in gold, thanks to a long-held position in a gold ETF and a portfolio stuffed to the gills with the higher-quality gold exploration and energy stocks of the sort followed in our International Speculator and Casey Energy Speculator services. But there is a real risk arising... a true tipping point... that I am not so sure I'll be happy to see.

While there are many factors that might push the economy over the edge, the one to watch closely now are the foreign holders of the U.S. dollar. As we have mentioned more than once, the amount of U.S. dollars in the hands of foreign holders is at historic levels. In fact, the level of holdings, estimated at as much as $16 trillion, is unprecedented by an order of magnitude.

At this point in the game, we would expect to see wealthy foreign individuals cashing in their dollars for all manner of alternatives, including other currencies, tangible property and, of course, gold and other tangible assets. Given the price of tangibles at this point, that trend is likely well underway.

Diversification out of the dollar by institutional holders is likely also underway. But after that, if pushed to it, will come the big kahunas: the foreign governments and their many trillions.

Up until this point, that they have been reluctant sellers can be understood in much the same way you can understand the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction when discussing the pros and cons of launching nuclear strikes against your similarly armed adversaries. At what point, however, do the foreign governments come to the conclusion that the other side has already "pushed the button"?

Watching Ben Bernanke, there is a reasonable chance, were I a foreign holder, that I might come to the conclusion that he has done the equivalent of just that.

Regardless, the pressure is growing daily on the economies of the Middle East and Asia, which have to date helpfully reinvested the money they have received in exchange for their goods into U.S. Treasury securities. And, by doing so, effectively imported our inflation back home. Even if they wish to continue avoiding the nuclear option, they will at some point be forced to it by the U.S. pursuing a monetary policy one could correctly term "Everyone for themselves!"

Make no mistake that once the tipping point is reached -- and if the Fed makes yet another steep cut at its next meeting on March 18, that could do it -- then things have the potential to shift from crisis to catastrophe almost overnight.

What impact would a true collapse in the dollar have on the global economy? It is a topic we'll continue to poke at here and in our various publications. But for now, keep your eyes wide open and your head down.

I'll touch on the second serious development this week, but the lunch bell has just rung, so I'm going to pass the baton over to Bud Conrad, who has sent over a couple of items he thought you'd find of interest...

Bud on Bernanke

In alarming testimony to the House Financial Services Committee, this week Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke declared: "We have a problem ... the spreads between the Treasury rates and lending rates are widening, and our policy is essentially, in some cases, just offsetting the widening of the spreads, which are associated with signs of illiquidity."

I said at the Denver Summit, and since in articles, to watch out when the Fed cuts and long-term rates don't drop.

It means that the rate-cutting process of printing money to buy Treasuries in an attempt to provide liquidity to lower rates is failing. The confidence in the ability of Bernanke, or anyone else, to stop the collapse is lost when people become aware that printing money makes it worth less. The Fed action becomes the fear, rather than the solution. At this point further cuts won't help the economy, because long-term and riskier rates will reflect that loss of confidence.

(Ed. Note: Bud Conrad recently gave a wide-ranging interview for the Gold Report on where the economy, gold, energy, food and interest rates may be headed. You can view it by clicking here.)

A Trip Down Memory Lane

Our own Terry Coxon sent along a link to a video of Richard Nixon announcing the end of gold convertibility, pointing out that I would especially enjoy the reference to "international speculators."

You can see Nixon make the announcement by clicking here.

The canceling of convertibility was, of course, a seminal event as it left the world with a pure fiat monetary system, an experiment which has subsequently resulted in the steady deterioration of all paper currencies, among other ill effects (including unchecked growth in government, thanks to the removal of any real obstacles to spending).

Will the whole house of cards implodes some day, forcing a return to a gold standard or some other system that forces fiscal restraint? If I was a betting man, I would place large sums that the answer is "yes"... it is inevitable.

In fact, the collapse may have already begun.

Energy Chart of the Week

By Chris Gilpin, Contributing Editor, Casey Energy Speculator

[click to enlarge]

Gasoline prices are comprised of several costs: transportation of oil (usual from some distant corner of the globe), refining costs and profits, more transportation of gasoline (to get it from the refinery to the gas station), taxes from every level of government, and the cost of buying the crude it all started from. This last cost has mounted, and now oil prices hold a greater and greater influence over gasoline prices.

In 2004, oil prices rose 50% from $30 to $45 roughly, and this created a corresponding 26% rise in gasoline prices. In other words, gasoline prices increased half as fast as oil prices did.

As oil prices have risen, the oil cost of gasoline has begun to dwarf all other components. Now when oil prices go up, it will cause a much steeper rise in gas prices. If oil were to make another 50% jump from $100 to $150 - which we think is quite possible in the next year or two - gasoline prices would rise at a rate closer to 35%. The U.S. average for regular-grade gasoline hovers around 310 cents per gallon right now with oil near $100; a 35% increase would lift it to 419 cents per gallon.

The rogue factor in all these calculations is refining capacity. Last spring, a spree of unplanned refinery outages pushed gasoline prices higher when oil had retreated to $60. By the time refining capacity came back online, oil was marching to $100. By having one major cost replace the other, gasoline prices have stayed between 280 and 310 cents per gallon since April 2007.

This may have created a false sense of security among motorists, who saw oil move up twenty or thirty dollars without much of a corresponding rise in gasoline prices. This spring refineries have scheduled their normal outages to switch from winter to summer-grade gasoline, but how many unplanned outages will occur? The U.S. oil-refining infrastructure is outdated and badly in need of replacement, but permitting a new refinery in the Lower 48 has proven to be a near impossible task. It's reasonable to expect a growing number of unplanned outages at refineries in the years ahead, and if any of these correspond with another jump in oil prices, then prices at the pump would roar to new heights.

As a motorist, it's all very annoying. The best tactic is to hedge your rising fuel costs with energy stocks that will benefit from higher oil prices - or trade in your car for one of those Flintstone vehicles. But I hear they can be rather hard on the feet.

[Ed. Note: If you are looking to profit from energy, you owe it to yourself to check out the Casey Energy Speculator. And it couldn't be easier, given that subscriptions come with a 3-month, no-questions-asked, 100% money-back guarantee. Check out the current profit-packed edition by clicking here now.)

The Other Important News of the Week

Last week I pointed to the breaking news Fitzroy MacLean of our Without Borders publication tipped me to, about German intelligence officers paying a Liechtenstein bank employee US$5.9 million to steal a disk containing the names of all the German account holders.

In writing this news up, I posited that the Germans likely also got the account names of non-Germans, "...giving the German government a very nice trading card."

It didn't take long for my intuition to be proved right, as it was announced this week that the Germans were now cooperating with friendly governments around the world so they, too, could corner tax miscreants.

Confirming the point, one of our subscribers sent along a news item from New Zealand about how that country's Internal Revenue Department is offering anyone with an offshore account, especially of the Liechtenstein variety to, in essence, come out with your hands up or else. If you are a New Zealander with assets in the pilfered bank, I have no doubt you are sweating bullets.

Here in the U.S. of A., the Internal Revenue Service is also working hand in glove with the Germans to hunt down the tax cheats.

This is a trend firmly in motion, with serious implications.

First, now that executives and even lower-level employees of banks in tax havens with the right levels of access have seen the going market price for client names, and that rather than being brought up on criminal charges for breaking confidentiality agreements, they will be saluted by officialdom around the world, there will be a rush to capitalize. All that the person needs to do is to grab the list, download the file, or whatever, and make it past the front door to collect on the waiting riches.

In addition to the considerable personal problems this will cause the account holders, it effectively spells an end to the idea of financial privacy.

And that is an important battle to be lost by anyone who values individual freedom. Look at it this way, until recently countries knew that if they squeezed too hard, money would begin slipping across the borders to undeclared safety. With that escape route closed, they can now squeeze ever harder.

Even so, human nature being what it is, you can expect the same people - at least those not in jail following the global witch hunt that will soon extend to the Caymans, Andorra, or any other jurisdictions where the bankers have been accommodative to privacy seekers - to look for other ways of hiding wealth.

Of course, gold, diamonds and other readily portable and fungible assets will find favor. Setting the stage for the battle in the war of the state against the individual: a new round of government confiscations of gold and other such assets, "in the public interest."

I can't see this happening imminently, and we should be able to see it coming, but the threat that it could happen in the next decade, along with foreign exchange controls and similar acts of desperation by the tax farmers, is real.

Now let me be clear. I am not in favor of tax cheating. Per the fresh example from Liechtenstein, the risks are too high and, in my view, always have been. But that doesn't mean that I can't lament the fact that the system is moving closer and closer to the point where you won't be able to enjoy any level of privacy in relation to your financial affairs.

Visa's $19 Billion IPO a Scam?

During the course of dinner with a highly positioned financial services executive the other night, he told me that Visa and MasterCard had lost a major lawsuit related to hidden charges, and that it will cost them a lot of money and force them to change their business in a number of detrimental ways.

Almost immediately thereafter I read that Visa was planning a $19 billion IPO. Coincidence, I wondered?

Curious, I decided to dig a bit. I hadn't gotten very far when I came across a very coherent analysis on the situation by Mish Shedlock. You can read it by clicking here.

Could the broader investment community catch on to the true intent of the IPO, dooming it and by doing so, maybe, lead to yet another giant stumbling? While that remains an outside possibility, it is by no means out of the question given the impact of the lost lawsuit, and that the credit card companies are almost certain to be next to feel the pain of consumer belt tightening.

I suspect most people wouldn't be unhappy if the credit card companies took it in the neck.

On that theme, years ago I interviewed a senior credit card company executive and over the course of our meeting, I mentioned to him that I had recently caught a charge for "lost credit card insurance" on my bill. It was for something like $46 a year - for nothing, as far as I could tell. Indignant, because I hadn't approved the charge, I called the service center and no sooner were the words of complaint out of my mouth than the representative said, "No problem, sir. That charge will be removed." In other words, no questions or pushback at all.

"Oh, that!" my new acquaintance, the credit card executive, commented, a smirk on his face. "That was the idea of the guy in the office next to me. We were running behind on the quarterly numbers and he came up with the idea to bump the revenue."

"You mean," I asked, a somewhat stunned look on my face, "that you simply hit all the credit cards with a $46 charge?" (And we're talking about hundreds of thousands of accounts.)

"Yep. It was a big winner, because most people don't look very hard at their bills."

"But that must be illegal," I said dismayed.

"Probably," he said with a dismissive shrug.

He didn't get the job.

Of course, the flip side of Visa running into trouble will be yet another form of credit that gets tighter... and more costly.

Miscellany

Lines of Lawyers. As predicted, lawyers armed with thick briefcases and high-digit display calculators are increasingly jostling each other in the long lines that are starting to form at the doorsteps of the wounded financial service industry behemoths.

This week, HSH Nordbank, a German sector public bank (translation, they have clout), announced it was going after UBS bank for "hundreds of millions" in subprime losses. As the piling on grows, we'll start to see the major bank failures that our own Bud Conrad has been forecasting these past months. Followed, natch, by the helicopters' worth of bailouts, courtesy of taxpayers.
High-Stakes Shell Game. In a classic shell game, the banks are trying to prop up the AAA ratings of the insurers standing behind the hundreds of billions of dollars of toxic waste now eating away at their portfolios. While cost effective -- $3 to $5 billion is a lot cheaper than the carnage that will follow a downgrade -- the odds are high that they'll invest the money, the insurers will get downgraded anyway, costing them their investments and the value of their portfolios. Unless, of course, the same helicopters show up with yet more taxpayer largess to keep the insurers intact. It would not surprise me in the slightest to see, even, the de facto nationalization of a failing rating agency.
In the "Remember, We're All Only Human" Department ... I came across another anecdote about another of the esteemed members of the judiciary, one Robert Somma, a federal bankruptcy judge appointed by President Bush in 2004. It appears he has stepped down from the bench after police found that he had crashed his Mercedes into another car while drunk and wearing a dress, fishnet stockings and heels, and carrying a purse. "He's a highly respected member of the bar," said a fellow judge, "and remains so." I don't care about his dress code, live and let live, I say... but next time, take a cab.
Look Before You Leap. There was news out this week that Norilsk, the Russian mining giant, was ordering a fleet of super icebreakers to take advantage of the melting of Arctic ice, opening up new routes across the top of the world. Someone might want to tell them not to place their deposit yet, because the Arctic ice hasn't just re-formed, it's thicker than ever. Here's the reference.

That's It for This Week

Major developments are afoot, with the term "We live in interesting times" barely covering it.

While we expect things to continue in a similar vein, and to likely grow steadily worse for some months and maybe even years to come, the best approach at this point is to assure that you and your family come out okay.

It's like the warnings that the flight attendants give during their briefings on the topic of what one should do should yellow oxygen masks start falling on your head while in flight. If you don't first take care of yourself, before turning your attention to the less well positioned, you could find yourself wiped out and of no use to anyone.

As I close my weekly musings, I see that gold is solidly planted at $971, oil is parked over $101 and the long-suffering DJIA is off yet another 295 points.

Wall Street types like to look down their nose at people who invest in gold, silver and other commodities... but they may have to revisit their prejudice, given that the broader U.S. stock markets have been essentially flat over the last 5 years... which means, adjusted for inflation, their favorite sector has been a loser for half a decade now. Decidedly not the case for the precious metals, energy and other commodities.

Until next week, thanks for reading and for subscribing...

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC

The Room 2/18/08

David Galland — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:00:21 GMT

Dear Reader,

Foolishly, I now realize, I closed last week's column by announcing that I would endeavor to write today's entire missive without a single mention of... okay, well, just this once... government.

Some readers have suggested that I could meet the test simply by replacing that specific word with another, for instance, "Turnip." While the idea has merit, as does even that word (looks a lot tastier than it is), I believe that self-created rules are rules nonetheless and no cheating allowed.

But, given the deep influence of that particular form of human activity, the task of producing this edition of The Room is made all the more daunting by my admittedly childish challenge.

I suppose we could talk about the weather.

(Actually, we can! My wife, the chief science officer of our household, gives a dismissive sniff any time I mention the latest forecast from local news sources, then logs on to consult with http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/geo/, a geostationary satellite with a number of filters that, once you master it, provides all the intel you'll ever need about what's really coming next.)

Okay, well, that about covers the small talk.

But before we move on, I must make one small edit to the rules surrounding today's challenge... namely that, should I decide to quote someone else, that person will not be subject to the same constraint, because, well, they weren't aware of the rules in the first place.

Okay, now that we have the rules straight, I'm going to wander into the kitchen for a further consultation with my dear friend, Ms. Rancilio Espresso-Maker, and let our own Bud Conrad take over the reins for a few moments.

As you may recall, last week Bud commented on the obvious play to be had in lumber. In a similar vein, this week he looks at commodities as a sector play...

Commodities: Looking Beyond the News

By Bud Conrad

We have read Jim Rogers' comment on commodities in his new book and seen the price of gasoline when we fill up, but most of us get too distracted by some enticing traditional investment, like a stock in some extractive resource, to think beyond the obvious.

For a year and a half, I have been watching grains scream higher. With oil, gold and odd items like milk and butter rising, I start to ask what might be beyond the horizon.

First, to report the bedrock under the commodities, see how commodities have jumped. There's no deflation there.

[click to enlarge]

Here is a chart on Minneapolis wheat, from $5 to $18 since last summer:

[click to enlarge]

It has been said that the guys that made the most money in the gold rush were the suppliers that provided the tools to the miners. So, who are the guys that are making money providing tools to the commodity traders? Here is one measure of the jump in this vein: the price of a seat on the commodity exchange. It jumped from under $10,000 in 1971 to $725,000 at the end of 2007 in Kansas City. These seats are traded on the exchange, and can earn profits along the way by being leased out to institutions or rich individuals who want to place trades directly.

[click to enlarge]

And a seat on the Minneapolis Grain Exchange tells the same explosive commodity story, jumping from $16,000 as recently as 2004 to $280,000 now:

All this is obvious once someone points it out. What else should we be looking at?

David again. Care to take up Bud's challenge? Drop me your ideas via email: david@caseyresearch.com.

(A possibly profitable trend pops into my own mind... I'll share it a bit later on. But first, this...)

The First Annual Casey Research Inflation Google

One of our core theses is that global price inflation is on an unstoppable upswing at this point. Supporting that contention are nearly daily reports from around the globe of rapidly escalating inflation emerging everywhere from Russia to Saudi Arabia... from Australia to China... and almost literally everywhere in between.

In fact, I have a rather eye-opening way to prove the point.

Simply enter the following search query into your favorite search engine, formatted as follows... except replace the "name of country" with the name of any country that pops to mind. Be sure to include the parentheses.

(name of country inflation 2008)
What you'll find, without exception, is a recent news story about local price inflation ratcheting up far more than previous expectations.

For example, I randomly googled Egypt... and here's what I found.

On February 8, the bank initiated a hike of 25 basis points, bringing its deposit rate to 9% and its lending rate to 11%. The decision came in the wake of news that inflation hit 11.5% in the year to January, reversing Egypt's disinflationary trend from the last quarter of 2007...

Okay, let's try another one. Throwing a mental dart at an invisible board, it lands on... Mauritania? Here's that story...

NOUAKCHOTT, Nov 15, 2007 (AFP) Mauritanian President Sidi Ould Cheikh Abdallahi ordered villages to stockpile food to help cushion the effect of rising inflation, his economic adviser said Thursday. The announcement came just days after the latest unrest over the crisis. Some six thousand tonnes of wheat had already been put aside for the stocks as part of a bid to stabilise prices, said Sidi Mohamed Ould Biye. The announcement [came] after a series of violent protests since last week over spiralling prices have left one person dead and 17 injured."

There are a number of reasons for this powerful upswing, but none more important than the fiat monetary regime that allows for a steady, unfettered flow of freshly minted paper and its electronic doppelgangers to enter the market. The most widely used and traded commodities, energy and food, are, like canaries in an old-fashioned coal mine, early warnings of what's coming.

This week, for instance, we have the news out of England that families there are now spending an extra £1,300 pounds a year (US$ 2,550) on household items, most notably food and fuel, which, according to an article in the Daily Telegraph, are rising at the briskest pace in 17 years.

As you can see by letting your eyes float back up the page to Bud's first chart, which shows the commodities index curve moving up more or less steadily since the U.S. dollar's link to gold was broken, the canary is now lying on its back, its cute little feet stretched upwards, a convulsive twitch the only indication of a weak spark of life.

Is there any force on earth that can stand in the way of commodities continuing to rise over the next thirty years and beyond? (With the inevitable short-term corrections along the way, of course.)

Absent a wholesale abandonment of the fiat monetary system, the answer is no. That many of these same commodities are concurrently getting harder and more expensive to find in any useful quantities only exacerbates the problem.

And, of course, as the cost of living goes up, so must wages and benefits, some of which are already pegged to automatic adjustments.

By now almost everyone is familiar with the concept of "tipping" points -- that point beyond which the inevitable also becomes the imminent. My favorite partner of all times, Doug Casey, is of the opinion that we are at that point.

I am finding it harder and harder to disagree.

Unless you are new to our services, you should, by now, be getting pretty chummy with the right side of this trend through investments in precious metals, energy commodities and other "stuff." Played right, these investments will assure you won't be one of those who, like our barely breathing canary, are caught by surprise by the unfolding monetary crisis. And you might even get rich... or richer than you already are.

These are topics we will, of course, continue to cover at greater length, and with far more specificity, in our various subscription services.

[ED. NOTE: If you're new to Casey Research and are looking for a good place to get started, take an inexpensive subscription to our BIG GOLD as that monthly newsletter offers simple and lower-risk ways to play the inflation trend. For more on BIG GOLD and its 3-month, 100% money-back satisfaction guarantee, click here.]

New Zealand Get-Together

At this time of year, Casey Research chairman and namesake Doug Casey likes to hang his spurs either in Salta, Argentina, or just outside of Auckland, New Zealand, where he is at this writing.

Given that I already correspond with a number of subscribers from New Zealand, I asked Doug if he might enjoy hosting an informal get-together for anyone in the area. You know, a couple of beers, a few laughs, that sort of thing. He said it would be his pleasure.

While we don't have anything yet in the way of a specific time or place, Auckland is the nearest big town to him, so it will be at a suitably equipped establishment (i.e., the presence of beer pulls and a decent wine list) there at some point in the next week or so.

If you are in the area and would like to meet up, just drop me a note at david@caseyresearch.com and I'll make sure you get the details.

Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Credit Crisis

Remember back when... when certain individuals associated with certain unnamed institutions were pontificating that the subprime losses would amount to no more than $100 billion to $150 billion? It turns out that said individuals were somewhat ill informed, a point made clear by the steady stream of blood-soaked dispatches coming back from the front of the credit crisis. Just this week...

Mortgage insurer MGIC announced yesterday it had a net loss of $1.47 billion, or $18 per share, mainly attributable to a $1.2 billion loss reserve. The company is now said be to urgently seeking new capital in order to avoid further rating downgrades.
It was announced Wednesday that between April and December 2007 alone, Japanese financial institutions have incurred losses of 600 billion yen (US$5.5 billion) from investments related to U.S. subprime mortgages. I have recently come across credible analysis that says the Japanese banks are scrambling behind the scenes to avoid fully disclosing the size of their subprime losses, but that it could run into many multiples of the number reported this week.
Bond insurer MBIA this week begged for relief from short-sellers and further, asked that the rules be changed about how bond insurers are assessed. Otherwise, they were at risk of going out of business by virtue of having done a spectacularly poor job and being punished for it with a ratings downgrade. Predictably, their argument revolves around the time-honored contention that they are too large to fail. Which is another way of saying that the burden of their losses should ultimately be shifted to taxpayers.
Warren Buffett seems to disagree, in effect, encouraging their collapse by offering to off-load the company's municipal bond liabilities (as well as those of the other bond insurers) at fire sale prices. Grasping at straws, the equity markets did a dead-cat bounce on the news based on the observation that, "Ah, Buffett is doing what JPMorgan did in 1907 to bail out the stock markets!" Not so fast, say us...

Bud Conrad's take...

"Buffett is no dummy. He isn't in this for the good of the U.S. economy: he's in it to make money. So I doubt he is paying more than the Muni insurance is worth. The sellers are up against the wall, having fire sales to stay afloat.

"They would be selling off their only assets that are worth anything, leaving behind the toxic waste. This is not the bailout that will fix the overleveraged guarantees on $2.4T of bonds by these insurers; rather, it confirms that they are desperate, and even closer to worthless, in my opinion. If such a deal goes through, it shortens the life of the insurers unless a big government bailout emerges."
UBS, Europe's largest bank, announced this week a fourth-quarter subprime-related loss of almost $12 billion. And it's not over yet. According to Bloomberg, the bank's CEO said that 2008 would be another "difficult year."
Perhaps, like a child caught with its hand in the cookie jar and then tries to deflect attention by pointing to the chocolate-smeared face of a nearby sibling, UBS analyst Philip Finch issued a report today stating that, in his view, the world's banking sector as a whole could suffer another $203 billion in losses due to the credit meltdown.

A billion here, $200 billion there, this is beginning to add up to real money. Or is it? It's hard to say any more, thanks to the steady drumbeat of these large numbers. It is positively numbing.

Which begs the question...

What, Really, Is a Billion?

Some time ago, I did an article in which I tried to remind people just how much a billion dollars is.

As I can't find that article to republish here, I trolled into the internet, that source of all knowledge, to find a reference I recalled from speeches Ronald Reagan used to make on the topic.

Here it is, from a 1977 speech.

Does anyone realize how much a single billion is? A billion minutes ago Christ was walking on this earth. A billion hours ago our ancestors lived in caves, and it's questionable as to whether they'd discovered the use of fire.

A billion dollars ago was 19 hours in Washington, D.C. And it'll be another billion in the next 19 hours, and every 19 hours until they adopt a new budget at which time it'll be almost a billion and a half.

But let me really paint the picture for you. If you gentlemen sent your wives out on a shopping spree, and gave them each a billion dollars, and told them not to spend more than a thousand dollars a day, they won't be home for 3,000 years.

Of course, that was then, and this is now. Based on the 2008 budget, it no longer takes 19 hours for $1 billion of your tax dollars to go out the door, but just three.

Or, viewed another way, your tax dollars are being spent at a rate of $331 million each and every hour of each and every day... 365 days of the year.

And even at that frenetic pace, it still takes 125 days to spend a trillion. Using $100 bills as our unit of measure, we find that it would require a stack 670 miles high to add up to $1 trillion.

Gee, I'm not sure that helped.

The Solution to All That Ails the World
(But Don't Tell Anyone)!

By Doug Hornig

Last weekend's meeting of the G-7 finance ministers in Tokyo came and went without much publicity. Concern about the state of the world economy was expressed, but no momentous actions were taken. Yawn. Yet for those who were paying attention, some very revealing dialogue slipped out.

Now let it be said that honesty and transparency are uncharacteristic of government in general. If they were more common, the people might actually know what was going on behind the curtain. And that's the last thing governments want because, were the public not so dumbed down, it might respond appropriately, with torches and pitchforks.

Thus our surprise at the following:

One of the things G-7 officials discussed was the need for collective action to calm markets if price moves become irrational, Jean-Claude Juncker was quoted as saying.

Juncker, who chairs the Eurogroup -- the monthly meetings of Eurozone finance ministers and the European Central Bank -- said in an interview he's concerned about ongoing turbulence in the financial markets.

"We are not yet at the end of the crisis," Juncker said. "The corrections will drag on for a few weeks, months. We have agreed in Tokyo that if there are irrational price movements in the markets, we will collectively take suitable measures to calm the financial markets."

No big news there. Although we devoutly believe in free markets, we're not so naïve as to believe that's their actual state. Governments intervene, all the time. Always, of course, "for our own good."

But here's the kicker. When asked what form such collective calming action might take, Juncker said: "Whoever has a strategy, should not set it out. Otherwise it will lose its effect if it is explained."

Well, that exposes the man behind the curtain, doesn't it? What Juncker is admitting is that not only should governments intervene, but it's important that they do so in secret. A strategy explained might become ineffective. Or, in other words, if people knew what these guys were up to, they might not want to go along!

A remarkably candid moment that Juncker probably wishes he could take back.

[ED. NOTE:Doug Hornig is the editor of the Daily Resource Plus, our free daily e-letter on all the latest news related to resource markets. If you are not yet receiving this valuable, yet complimentary service, you can sign up by clicking here now. ]

An Unfolding Trend

Earlier in this edition, Bud challenged readers to come up with other trends and ways to play them profitably.

I have an early entrant. It is that over the next ten years, we are going to see a growing number of nations to ban the export of critical resources.

As I have commented on in the past, given that it has now been established that Mexico's massive Cantarell oil field is past its peak and at risk of becoming uneconomic within the next 10 years, how long do you think it will be before that country starts restricting oil exports to its northern neighbor?

In fact, oil imports from Mexico are already off by 21% just since December 2006. And they are expected, based on current trends, to drop by as much as another 1 million barrels a day over the next decade (from about 1.3 million bbl per day currently).

For the record, in addition to Mexico, the other largest oil exporters to the U.S. include Canada at the #1 spot, followed by Saudi Arabia and then Venezuela, at #3. Thus, when Hugo Chavez threatens to cut oil shipments, as he has done again recently, it is a threat actually worth paying attention to.

So, one entrant on a trend to profit from would be to buy the oil sands companies that have gotten beaten up. It is just a matter of time before Canadians see the wisdom of dropping a nuclear power plant over the oil sands, providing the energy required to extract the oil economically. This play could take awhile to unfold, but given how beat up many of the oil sands companies were, it's a play to keep an eye on.

But my big idea here is that, as the world's resources come under increasing pressure, you can expect to hear more and more calls for countries to limit exports -- the equivalent of hoarding on a national scale -- leading to massive economic dislocations and, one would assume, opportunities for the fleet of foot.

Lending support to this idea, Vietnam announced this week that it would immediately begin cutting back the amount of coal it will allow exported, and is thinking of stopping all exports by 2015. According to Bloomberg, Nguyen Khac Tho, vice director of the Ministry of Industry and Trade's energy and petroleum department, made the following comments in a phone interview:

Coal is a resource that can't be renewed. Our most important task is to meet domestic demand to ensure national energy security.

([ED. NOTE: I would be remiss on many levels if I didn't mention that we have been following the coal story closely in the Casey Energy Speculator... to learn more and take a trial subscription is as easy as clicking here.)

The Letter Bag

I received the following note from a subscriber, Daniel T. I thought you'd find the following excerpt of interest.

Dear David,

I want to convey something that may be of interest to you, with regard to what's happening in the ongoing saga of the big banks. About six weeks ago, a close friend told me that she had just gotten a letter from her mortgage lender informing her that her HELOC (Home Equity Line of Credit) is now frozen due to the "current financial climate" or some vague reason like that.

I immediately thought about my own HELOC and said to myself "They won't ever do that to me – I'm an accredited investor, never ever a late payment on anything, no credit card debt, no car loans, lots of equity in a higher-end home in a neighborhood that actually appreciated in the last year, great FICO score, etc."

My HELOC was for about $250,000, which I never touched and only thought of it as perhaps useful one day for some quick cash to bridge some investment opportunity, or whatever.

But because I believe Bud Conrad and all his brilliant analyses (not to mention you and the rest of the Casey crew), I decided to take all of my equity money out of the HELOC except for a few thousand, and put it into something that will return, at the very least, the cost of the interest payment and exceed even that for some profit. (That's not hard to do being a Casey Research subscriber).

Guess what? In less than a week, I got the same letter as my friend. It was from IndyMac Bank, one of the bigger banks, telling me that my HELOC was now frozen. From the contents of the letter, I could tell that it came from another department of IndyMac which had no idea I had just cleaned them out.

You better believe that I was very happy I got those $$$ out and put them to good use.

I tell you this so as to possibly warn others, especially those that are absolutely depending on their HELOC to carry them through rough times. We are going to see a lot more of this. If they would do this to someone with my financial profile, then, well... look out.

Just Google "banks freeze helocs" and have a look. One can only imagine what will happen when this becomes widespread and what will happen to people who utterly depend on their HELOC for survival. Scary. This could be the last straw for many.

I'm very much looking forward to seeing you again at the Crisis and Opportunity Summit in Scottsdale. The last one was great.

Best,

Daniel Trevor

Make no mistake, the credit crisis is far from over. In fact, it is spreading.

Miscellany

Foreigners Go Home... Many in the U.S. wish the illegal immigrants would get the hell out. Well, if you fall into that camp, you will be cheered to hear that you may be getting your wish. An unintended consequence, however, is that they may be taking some segments of the economy with them. Follow the link below for the story from the New York Times.

Click here to view.

Except Sovereign Wealth Funds... Here's a cool tool to look at the size and distribution of sovereign funds. Note that there are two tabs in the upper right-hand corner of the page the link leads to... http://tinyurl.com/yokar9

The Nature of Complexity... I have often commented on the fact that we live in a complex world. Which is why, no doubt, so many people are willing to let the mass media do their thinking for them. It is far easier to accept as truth the latest news burbling out of CNN, rather than puzzle things out for yourself. On that topic, earlier this week, Doug Casey forwarded me a link to an exceptional speech on that topic by author Michael Crichton.

If you are comfortably seated and have a bit of time, do yourself a big favor and give this a read. You might even want to pass it along to your family, friends and associates. Given the general dearth of critical thinking these days, the world can use all the help it can get.

Here's the link...

http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-complexity.html

And that, dear readers, is it for this week's edition.

In review, I found that I sort of, but not quite, avoided references to the "Turnip" today. It is, I can assure you, no simple task given the deep roots that the Turnip has in all things, financial and otherwise.

A quick glance at the numbers shows that gold is holding, yet again, over $900 on the week, and the U.S. stock market is, once again, losing ground.

As always, I greatly appreciate you taking time out of your day to read, and for subscribing.

Sincerely,

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

The Room 2/11/08

David Galland — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:00:00 GMT

Dear Readers,

Good morning! And welcome to this edition of The Room!

If that salutation suggests a certain snap in my step, well, you'd be right.

After all, one can't let one's attitude be overly colored by the gloom and pessimism now stalking the land.

No, this is America... or, at least that is the turf upon which my own chair is currently parked. And no matter how bad things may be, they are, on the whole, no better or worse than those of most other places.

In fact, America has some significant commercial advantages over many countries, especially those which aspire to provide their citizenry a nest of perfect comfort in all the important ways, including semi-permanent employment. "You hire them, you retire them" is a phrase you might hear down at town hall in much of the world.

Not in the ol' U.S. of A. No siree. In those cases where management makes a major flub or reaches too far for the annual bonus and, in so doing, accidentally flips on the Equity Value Death Laser Model 2000-X, you need hardly wait for the minute hand to travel a single rotation before the guillotines are dragged out of storage.

Since July 2007, for instance, Countrywide has held going-away parties (however muted) for 11,000 employees. Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan have both bid farewell to 1,000 of their former stalwarts, with announcements that more will follow once they can afford to buy the requisite pink paper on which to print the traditional "so long and thanks for all the memories" notes.

Meanwhile, Lehman Brothers escorted 3,750 of its less close family members to the door, and Citigroup has begun trimming its rolls, a process by which its alumni will, it is reported, increase by 20,000.

The list goes on and on. In fact, according to the bean counters down at the Department of Labor Statistics, at least 1,408,852 people lost their jobs in 2007 (through November), due to mass layoffs... a 6% increase from 2006. Of that total, many were formerly involved with the building trades which, alone, have lost 284,000 workers since employment in that feast-or-famine sector peaked in September of 2006.

And, I need not remind you that the neck-chopping is just getting started.

While it is, of course, unpleasant to be one of those looking down into the basket while the hooded man finishes his preparations, it is this ability - and willingness - to view the common laborer as something of a disposable item that allows America to bounce back so quickly after periods of economic adversity.

Friend of long standing, Bill Bonner, wrote an excellent piece in his always worthwhile Daily Reckoning (dailyreckoning.com) earlier this week in which he commented:

Americans misunderstood the nature of capitalism itself. It is not an "economic system" that makes people automatically richer. It is a moral system... a system that rewards virtue and punishes error. You don't get richer because of Free Enterprise. Indeed, as the economic history of the last quarter-century shows, you can get poorer. The market system merely provides the setting in which you get what you deserve. You could get rich - if you were to do the right thing: work hard, save your money, innovate, take chances, forgo consumption. But do the wrong thing... and you will pay for it.

Bill is, in my view, right on the money.

Now, please, make no mistake. I would race even a humanitarian on the scale of Al Gore to be the first to pull the lever on any magic machine that reliably delivered on the promise of effortless wealth, health and happiness to all humankind. Sadly, such a machine does not exist.

(And, yes, that is a photo of Al Gore, taken at the recent Davos gala... if you ask me, he has been personally sequestering too many carbon units of late.)

And so we are left with only one economic model that has been proven to actually provide the most benefit to the most people over any period of time: capitalism.

In fact, if you think about it, pure capitalism is really just a continuum of the world's first discernable economic model; "survival of the fittest."

While previously success was gained through skill with the club or at throwing rocks accurately, in the modern-day iteration, the successful are those who understand how to effectively run a business, or know how to make themselves particularly valuable to their employer.

(There is another class of individuals which one has to begrudgingly credit as successful these days; the bureaucrats and other parasitic professions. They understand how to tap into the communal lifeblood and, once entrenched, sink barbs into the body politic to assure they cannot be ejected until they leave of their own free will, a lifelong pension in hand. Their long-term survival, however, is questionable... because they propagate so quickly that, over time, they risk killing the host, or being chased out of their jobs by workers brandishing torches and pitchforks.)

The data continues to confirm that we are headed into a deepening crisis here, which means that unemployment, the first whiffs of which we have now smelled, will only grow worse. In some countries, the economic pain will be deep and dragged out by well-meaning but misguided policies.

In the U.S., however, the odds are relatively good that after the brush fire burns through, the businesses will remain standing, albeit with much lighter attendance at the Friday morning pep talk, ready to pick up the pieces and get smartly back to work.

But it is time to prepare for the brush fire.

How bad could it get? In my view, and the view of most of us here at Casey Research, while the risk is certainly there, the odds remain long against widespread soup lines. If for no other reason than that if you overlay the economic happenings of the last 300 years with the number of months where soup line-level economic havoc has been the order of the day, it quickly becomes clear that massive meltdowns are statistically very rare in the more established economies.

Yet, though rare, the historical record is equally clear that they do happen.

Given the degree of uncertainty just now, it is not unreasonable to take a little time to examine your current circumstances. Do you own some gold bullion to provide protection against a serious crisis? Have you taken steps to offset losses in other areas - and hopefully pull down nest-padding profits - by building a portfolio of quality gold stocks? Are you able to raise a bit more cash "just in case"?

As importantly, are you trying a bit harder to look after your health? Cutting back on the snacks, a little more exercise? Having a health crisis in the middle of a financial crisis would be the very definition of unfortunate.

As well, if you are still in the work force, it is worth taking steps to improve your personal value as an entrepreneur or an employee. On that topic, longer-term readers know that while in my late teens I discovered, with full credit to Earl Nightingale for the revelation, the fountain of wealth: studying a topic you care about one hour a day, just like a college student studies their books.

If you work for a company, how much do you think you could learn about your company and its competition by studying just one hour a day, even after only a few months? Think your new-found knowledge would impress the boss? Darn right it would.

Or, if you are in a dead-end job, or suspect you may be one of those soon to be led to the guillotines, now is a good time to begin studying something that might help you in your next career. The secret is that it must be a subject you are passionate about. Follow your heart, and the money and your life satisfaction will follow.

As a personal aside, in recent weeks, I have turned my daily studies to electronic marketing media - an area that has the advantage of being helpful to almost any business, or anyone with entrepreneurial aspirations. (If you think you might benefit from that same course of studies, there are many good websites where useful, and free, information on the topic is available. One of the best I have come across is marketingexperiments.com.)

Oh, and since we're on that topic, I'd like to mention that we are looking for an experienced marketing director to help us spread the word about Casey Research... just drop me a résumé at David@caseyresearch.com.

But, back on topic, while it is my style and temperament to comment on the world with a lighter tone, make no mistake that I feel very strongly for those whose life's travails have left them unsatisfied, financially or emotionally. You can let it get you down, or you can set your jaw against the challenge and get down to work.

There are, per Bill's comments above, no guarantees built into a capitalist system... other than, one would hope, a guarantee that you get to play on a more or less level playing field. Regretfully, in modern-day America, the system has been substantially degraded by a legislative system that is willing and able to meddle in literally any aspect of life, or bestow almost any grant, opening the door for businesses and their lobbying organizations to influence legislation in much the same way I can get my old dog General to beg by holding up a piece of ham.

In the final analysis, each of us has to look after ourselves and our loved ones. If you look to the government, which is bankrupt beyond all possible repair at this point, to provide you with your retirement, or to assure that the safety net remains intact, you will be setting yourself up for steady disappointment and a life that fails to provide anything more than the barest of necessities, if that.

What Futures Markets Are Saying About Interest Rates and the Economy

By Bud Conrad

The combined effect of a slowing economy and the Fed cutting its rate to stimulate has caused the expectation for 3-month dollar-denominated investments called Eurodollars to drop in 2008 to below 2.5%, but then to rise into the future. (Despite the name, this has nothing to do with the euro currency).

[click to enlarge]

I interpret this to reflect a slowing in the economy through 2008, but that then the inflation will pick up, and investors will require higher rates to cover that inflation. It is part of recognizing that the Fed cuts rates by providing more liquidity. The result is that in the short run rates drop, but in the longer run inflation returns and rates have to rise to cover that inflation.

Making Money in a Crisis

In the current edition of the International Speculator, we provide a list of ETFs you can use to play the current financial crisis.

But, as Bud Conrad points out, it is really not that hard to find successful investments if you open your eyes and use logic. And, I would add, if you understand the various instruments available to you to act on these opportunities.

For example, it's no secret to anyone that the housing construction industry is in a slump.

So, what material is widely used in the building of most houses? The answer, lumber, is obvious.

As you might expect, therefore, and as is demonstrated in the chart just below, lumber prices have fallen along with the activity in the building sector.

[click to enlarge]

According to Bud, who is well versed in the futures markets...

"If you were to play the futures markets, you could have bought a contract for 110,000 board feet of 2"x4" priced at $217/1,000 ft. The contract is worth $23,000. The $90 price drop shown in the chart represents a profit of 900 points, which you multiply by $11 per board feet = almost $10,000. As the initial margin is $1,650, your returns could have been roughly 700% over a six-month period."

Of course, futures markets can swing both ways, and steeply so, and so should only be approached after a great deal of hard research and paper trading. Options trading, while also risky, offers the advantage of high leverage, but with identifiable and limited risk. Taking the time to learn more about options can also pay off, but again, be careful only to invest with money you can afford to lose.

Ed. Note: At the risk of being perceived as cementing a reputation for being crassly commercial, I am compelled to mention that, in addition to giving other profit-making ideas, options specialist Robert Meier of the RMB Group will be presenting a workshop on the right - and wrong - ways to use options at our upcoming Crisis & Opportunity Summit in beautiful Scottsdale, AZ on March 25, 26 & 27. If you are planning to attend, you'll need to register within the next seven days because there are only about 20 seats remaining. The secure link to learn more and register is just below:

http://www.caseyresearch.com/crpmkt/crpSolo.php?id=106

People Say the Funniest Things...

For some reason, the memory comes to me of the time when, putting in service as the best man at a wedding, I greeted Eleanor Mondale, the ex-vice president's beautiful daughter, in the receiving line. I was single at the time, and so the sight of Ms. Mondale, a model back then, was particularly well received. For some reason, however, the words that tumbled out of my mouth on making her acquaintance - and I still don't know where they came from - didn't appear to make exactly the right impression.

"Nice shoes," I said, looking at her feet. "I bet they must hurt." (In my weak defense, her shoes had very high heels and with very narrow tips.)

A quizzical expression passed over her attractive countenance (shown in the photo) before she replied, "Ah, no. They are just fine, thank you," before she hurried away, glancing back as she moved, I suspect, to be sure I wasn't following her.

John McCain had such a moment when, in a randy mood last year, he burst into song (poorly, it must be added) with the theme that the U.S. government, ideally under his leadership, should engage in the mass annihilation of the unfortunates who, by accident of birth, live under the Iranian theocracy.

(I refer, of course, to his rendition of "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran"... posted for all posterity here... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAzBxFaio1I)

Now, because we serve a broad audience, I suspect that there are any number of you who might agree with Senator McCain's musical sentiment, responding to any critics of same with a roll of the eyes and a comment along the lines of, "C'mon, really! Has everyone lost their sense of humor? Jeez!"

While I admit that the idea of unleashing waves of missiles against another country and the thought of "collateral damage" is a knee-slapper, I do wonder if a majority of the U.S. electorate will share the joke come election time.

I suspect not.

As a result, I strongly suspect that Sen. McCain's long-held aspirations to the highest office may likewise be scuttled.

Especially because, in addition to the somewhat concerning psychology revealed by his impromptu outburst of nihilistic verse, the perma-Senator is firmly on record as being in concert with the idea that America should occupy Iraq for 100 years, a sentiment that is not in step, if you believe the polls, with the majority.

And as a result, Obama or Hillary will be elected. (Sorry, Ron Paul fans, he may have raised a lot of money, but he's been effectively marginalized by the media and his fellow Republicans.)

And this points to the sticky wicket in democratic politics. You see, I am personally quite sure that I would prefer the economic policies of Sen. McCain over those of Sen. Clinton or Sen. Obama... but I'm equally certain that I would prefer either of those candidates' less martial backgrounds and leanings over those of Sen. McCain.

It is a classic no-win proposition. And so I prepare instead to cope the best I can with the damage that I see coming. Given that it is likely the Democrats will soon be ruling the roost, that means preparing for an acceleration of the feel-good policies that have laid such a solid foundation for escalating inflation - and higher gold prices.

My old associate from EverBank (Everbank.com), Chuck Butler, recently shared a Warren Buffett quote with the readers of his Daily Pfennig e-letter. Longer-term readers know that there are issues on which Mr. Buffett and I fail to see eye to eye, but in these remarks, I am in agreement. And I quote....

If something is unsustainable, it's going to have consequences; so far the consequences have been a general decline in the dollar against major currencies. If we continue the same policies, we're going to get the same results in the next five or 10 years.

He also had this to say about inflation... "Inflation has been in remission and is likely to be more prevalent in the next 10 years."

There are many things that cause dislocations in the marketplace, but few are as predictably disruptive - and, if you know how to play things, profitable - as government. The writing is on the wall. Now you just need to take the steps to prepare yourself to profit.

Quick Takes on Politics

At this point in the election cycle, it is probably appropriate for us to share, once again, the world's shortest political quiz, a reliable tool to tell you where you really belong on the political scale.

You can take it here: http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html

And, to assist you in contemplating the human frailties that argue so convincingly in favor of restricting the power afforded to any government, there is the following video featuring the antics of one of the anointed of America's political class. While you may have seen one of these videos in the past, this one is particularly well executed. Follow the link just below...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqLvBUSJucg

The Housing Market - Watch Out Below

One of the more interesting aspects of the current soaring default rate on home mortgages -- the very same defaults that are now bedeviling financial institutions around the globe -- is that the sophisticated models that were created to predict the behavior of the borrowers failed so badly.

This week, in an article in the Financial Times (ft.com), they discussed these failures at some length. Following are some excerpts I thought you would find of interest...

"There has been a failure in some of the key assumptions which supported our analysis and modeling," Mr. McDaniel admits. "The information quality deteriorated in a way that was not appreciated by Moody's or others." Mortgage borrowers, in other words, did not behave as expected.

The issue at stake revolves around so-called delinquency rates, the proportion of people who fall behind on their debt repayments. When American households have faced hard times in previous decades, they tended to default on unsecured loans such as credit cards and car loans first -- and stopped paying their mortgage only as a last resort. However, in the last couple of years households have become delinquent on their mortgages much faster than trends in the wider economy might suggest. That is particularly true of the less creditworthy subprime borrowers. More-over, consumers have stopped paying mortgages before they halt payments on their credit cards or automotive loans -- turning the traditional delinquency pattern on its head. As a result, mortgage lenders have started to face losses at a much earlier stage than in the past.

"In the past, if a household in America experienced financial problems it tended to go delinquent on its credit cards, but kept on paying its mortgage," says Malcolm Knight, head of the Bank for International Settlements, the central banks' bank. "Now what seems to be happening is that people who have outstanding mortgages that are greater than the value of their home, or have negative amortization mortgages, keep paying off their credit card balances but hand in the keys to their house . . . these reactions to financial stress are not taken into account in the credit scoring models that are used to value residential mortgage-backed securities."

And this...

In recent months, Washington politicians have devoted a great deal of attention to the problem of "resets". This refers to the fact that many subprime borrowers took out loans in recent years at initial, ultra-low "teaser" rates, which typically rise (or "reset") after a couple of years. Around 1m of these subprime loans are due to reset this year, which means that many households could suddenly face sharply higher repayments. That in turn has sparked fears of a looming further rise in delinquencies by increasingly cash-strapped households.

To offset this risk, the administration of President George W. Bush recently brokered a plan to freeze the resets. Yet in private, Treasury officials admit that while the scheme might help at the margins, it is unlikely to be a "silver bullet". This is because one dirty secret of recent mortgage data is that, thus far, there has been a surprisingly weak correlation between rate resets and delinquencies. That suggests that the reset freeze may have only a limited effect on foreclosures this year.

And....

Some economists suspect that if house price declines continue but the US jobs market holds up, the pattern of high mortgage defaults relative to other forms of consumer credit could continue. However, if the US slips into recession or even a protracted period of rising unemployment, delinquencies might rise on a wide range of consumer credits, implying a return to a more traditional pattern. Indeed, some banks are starting to brace themselves for this latter shift. "The problems in the credit markets are spreading to the consumer sector - the next area of concern is auto loans and credit cards," says John Thain, chief executive of Merrill Lynch.

I am reminded of a website that Doug Casey (who was first among others) brought to my attention this week. It is www.youwalkaway.com.

Should you click that link, you will find an enterprising e-biz that makes its money by providing homeowners, tired of the burden of paying their mortgages, with a kit that shows them the ins and outs of walking away with no further liabilities. And, even better, it explains how said mortgagees can live payment-free for the typical 8-month period it takes before the lenders are able to escort you from the premises.

Unfortunately for the economy and for those holding the "AAA" rated paper built out of these corrosive loans, www.youwalkaway.com is likely to become an increasingly popular site. Which brings me to...

Neutron Loans

Yesterday I had a pleasant lunch with a financial planner friend of mine. As he tends to deal with a more upscale clientele, he was unfamiliar with a category of mortgages sometimes called "payment optional."

If you thought "Ninja" mortgages were about as bad as it got -- you know, No income, No job, No Assets - then that is only because you haven't come across the payment optional feature offered to many of those same mortgagees.

In a nutshell, payment optional allows borrowers to elect to pay only a portion of their mortgage payment in any given month, rolling the balance-due but unpaid amount back into the original loan. This option was offered under the guise of allowing borrowers to deal with an emergency cash need. You know, the car breaks down and so, for a month, you pay less on your mortgage in order to have available the funds required to repair the car.

The problem, of course, is that many consumers, swept up in the giddy housing boom and romanced by the mortgage originators, borrowed more than they should have. And, when finding themselves unable to make the required payments, they began to fall back on the payment optional feature in order to get them through to the next payday.

With the magic of compounding interest now working against them, the situation was, and is, clearly untenable, assuring a steady supply of fresh customers for youwalkaway.com.

Bloomberg had a good article on the topic. For those of you short of time, here's a quick excerpt...

Feb. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Joe Ripplinger took out a $184,000 mortgage in 2006 and makes his payments every month.

Now he owes $192,000.

The 66-year-old Minneapolis house painter has a payment-option adjustable-rate mortgage. It allows him to write a check for $565 a month even though he owes $1,300. The difference is added to the mortgage, and when his total debt reaches $212,000, or after five years have passed, his monthly minimum will jump to about $2,800, which he can't afford.

"We're barely making it right now," Ripplinger said.

The estimated 1 million homeowners with $500 billion of option ARMs are beyond the help of interest-rate cuts by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke. While subprime borrowers face an average increase of 8 percent or less when their adjustable- rate mortgages reset, option ARM homeowners may see their monthly payments double after their adjustments kick in.

"We call them neutron loans because they're like a neutron bomb," said Brock Davis, a broker with U.S. Express Mortgage Corp. in Las Vegas. "Three years later the house is still there and the people are gone."

You can read the article in its entirety by following the link here.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=akYNTEygRJH8&refer=exclusive

The Honorable Richard L. Armitage

Our own Bud Conrad attended a talk at Stanford last night by Richard Armitage, called Diplomacy: Humanitarianism in Action. Here's Bud's report:

Armitage was the second-in-command at the State Department, serving from 2001 to 2005 during Colin Powell's tenure. He had a front-row seat of the decision to go to war on Iraq. He served in Vietnam, was implicated in the outing of Valerie Plame, is on the board of directors of Conoco Phillips and is now working for John McCain's presidential campaign.

He strode on the stage and spoke without notes, evoking the image of a weak impersonation of General Patton. He wore a rumpled suit and was the only person with a tie. The speech was lightly attended, with an audience of only 60 or so. I guess students are more interested in basketball than a conservative who is now slipping off the political stage.

While the speech was of no particulate import, befitting the empty suit he has become, at the reception afterward I gained this most important insight: I asked him what the reason was for going to war in Iraq, and specifically if it was about oil.

He demurred, saying that he was part of the decision and the focus was on WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) and on bringing the light of democracy to the region. I pursued to ask how long we would be in Iraq. His answer was "a decade," although with decreasing forces. We didn't discuss the costs, as he still supports the original decision, but from the view of an economist, I have my interpretation. Namely, that we will be spending $100 to $200 billion per year we are there, so, if his assessment is correct, we can expect to add another $1+ trillion to the tab of what we've spent so far.

This ensures continued U.S. deficits and lower productivity, which confirms my basic thesis that the dollar will continue to come under pressure.

(On the topic of wars with Iraq, Doug Hornig, editor of our Daily Resource Plus, sent along the following YouTube video, featuring a rather interesting 1994 interview with *** Cheney. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9YuD9kYK9I)

Get Well Soon

Living in a ski resort as I do, it is not unusual to hear a debate around the dining table on the topic of what is more dangerous, skiing or snowboarding.

Each side of the debate has their opinion, but our own Dave Johnsen, the programmer who assures our websites work each day, decided to wade in decisively on the topic, crashing his snowboard into a tree and breaking his fibula, as well as tearing his ACL, MCL, LCL, and meniscus.

Confined to bed after eight hours of surgery yesterday, he will have abundant time to jot down his further thoughts on the skiing vs. snowboarding debate. In the meantime, all of the Casey team would like to wish him a speedy recovery. (Oh, and if the website starts to get all wiggly, you can now appropriately assign the blame... to snowboarding.)

1984

It is, at this point, a tired literary device to reference George Orwell's seminal work, 1984, when commenting on the recent erosion of personal liberties.

Yet, the notion of an all-powerful entity snooping into your everyday affairs, ala Mr. Orwell's Big Brother, is sufficiently disturbing that observers of these things can't help but to drag it out, much in the same way others commenting on another genre might recall Frankenstein, or Dracula.

Unfortunately, while monsters made from reconstructed men or eternally living blood suckers are pure fiction, Orwell's monster is increasingly real.

Earlier this week, one of our researchers related a conversation between himself and his tax accountant. While requiring him to fill out a rash of new government forms, she commented that, in her role as a professional tax preparer, she no longer worked for him but for the government.

But it gets much worse. You see, our elected officials are now fast-tracking legislation to institutionalize warrantless eavesdropping on your every communication.

Don't believe me? Click the link below...

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/02/sen-rockefeller.html

The Quiet Revolution in Natural Gas

By Chris Gilpin, contributing editor, Casey Energy Speculator

While natural gas production has hummed along, slowly increasing in the U.S. over the past ten years, it would be a big mistake to think that everything is business as usual. There is a major shift underway in the natural gas industry. Conventional gas production is going the way of the dodo bird, while unconventional production - from sources like coal bed methane, tight gas and gas shales - has stepped up and made itself known as the future of natural gas.

The Lower 48 has been pumping more natural gas from unconventional sources than conventional ones since 2000 - the trend is accelerating. Conventional gas could soon account for less than a third of overall production.

The transition from conventional gas to unconventional has been remarkably smooth. It turned out to be much less of a challenge to exploit unconventional sources of natural gas than to exploit unconventional sources of oil, such as oil shale and tar sands (both of which have been nightmares from an engineering perspective).

A conventional gas operation is rather discreet, with a single well working every 640 acres or so, while a Coal Bed Methane (CBM) project dots the landscape with wells everywhere, as many as one per 80 acres. There's a lot of needless hand wringing over the aesthetics of such operations, but what interests us is how this infrastructure build has affected the landscape of supply and demand. For instance, the average production per well has been dropping precipitously.

[click to enlarge]

Despite its growing popularity, unconventional gas is no one's first choice. CBM projects require a huge amount of infrastructure to duplicate the same amount of production as one conventional well. Your average conventional gas well in the U.S. produces about 600 Mcf/d, while your average CBM gas well often pumps out less than 100 Mcf/d.

To make up the difference, the industry has been forced to drill, fracture, dewater, and maintain a lot more wells - all of which costs money. Gas producers have no choice but to pass these expenses along to the broader market, which has been a major factor in the rise of natural gas prices from $2/Mcf in 1998 to over $6/Mcf today.

The same story holds true in western Canada where CBM has just begun catching on in the last few years. The average initial productivity of a gas well drilled in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin has dropped from 1,000 to 300 thousand cubic feet per day over the last five years, a combination of ailing conventional gas resources and the rise of unconventional ones.

Without unconventional gas, the U.S. would be left trying to outbid the rest of the world for cargoes of LNG (liquefied natural gas), an unappealing scenario.

Many of the most intriguing investment possibilities now lie in parts of the world outside of the U.S. where unconventional technology is breaking virgin ground. Alberta is just starting to ramp up CBM production. Southeast Asia has huge reserves of unconventional gas that have never been properly explored. Using the American experience as a template, natural gas-producing regions all over the world are learning that it pays to think unconventional.

[Ed. Note: Dr. Marc Bustin, a senior researcher for the Casey energy division, is one of the leading unconventional gas experts in the world. The team is watching for opportunities in gas to open up in the spring and summer, after prices ease up due to seasonal considerations.

In the meantime, the energy division just updated a Special Report, North America's Top 5 Uranium Explorers... featuring the 5 best junior uranium stocks.

This is of particular interest now, because the uranium juniors as a sector have swung from massively overbought to deeply oversold. As determined contrarians, the time is fast approaching to begin reloading in the sector, and these are the companies you'll want to own.

As a subscriber to the Casey Energy Speculator, you'll find the report in the Special Reports section of this website... for everyone else, you can receive the report free of charge if you subscribe today.

Remember, your subscription comes with a no-questions-asked, 3-month money-back guarantee. Click here to get "North America's Top 5 Uranium Explorers" today.]

Affordable Health Care for All

Not so long ago, I was chatting with a cab driver while riding from JFK into Manhattan, when the conversation turned to what constituted a living wage. "I can't even afford health care," he said grumpily, weaving his cab with the grace of a ballet dancer between gaps in rumbling semi-trucks. With a snort he commented, "I'm not much of a Hillary fan, but the time has come for universal health care."

"That may be so," I chimed in from the back seat, "but I once lived in Canada and while there, watched someone I cared for deeply enter the nationalized health care system. After many months of bureaucracy and red tape, he ended up dead because they didn't run the tests that would have discovered his cancer, until it was too late."

"Yeah, but..." he started, his thoughts cut off by the need to concentrate on cutting off the competitor's cab trying to squeeze onto the expressway beside him.

"Here's a question," I continued. "If you didn't have to pay so much of your money in taxes... income taxes, property taxes, taxes on gasoline and all the things you buy... how much money do you think you'd save every year?"

"A lot!" he replied, a happier note in his voice as his mind contemplated the idea.

"So, if you didn't have to pay all those taxes, but instead maybe just a 10% flat tax, do you think you might be able to afford health insurance then?" I asked, rhetorically.

"Hadn't thought of that," he said, shaking his head with some confidence. "But, yes, I could. No problem."

So, what do you think? Could my "Unified Theory on Solving the U.S. Health Care Dilemma" qualify me for a Nobel prize? Who knows, I might actually have a chance, given that the bar on that prize seems to have been precipitously lowered in recent years.

Miscellany

A number of you have sent in the article from the NY Times discussing how merchants there are starting to post signs announcing "Euros Accepted." A sign of the times, to be sure, but I'm watching for the day that they start posting signs "Gold Accepted."
Ernst & Young made headlines this week by saying that most metals analysts' predictions of metal prices "have consistently and significantly lagged behind the actual spot market," and that mining and metals equities have been undervalued. To which I reply, "Welcome to our world."

Here's just one of a number of memorable points they made in their report:

"It is our view that current metal prices are actually a return to sustainable price levels following an extended period of artificially depressed prices, rather than the conventional wisdom that the industry is near the top of a cycle."
I asked one of our researchers to do an analysis of what price level gold needs to reach before we would, based on historical precedence, start seeing serious movement in the gold stocks. For data points, we looked back at two prior gold bull markets, then adjusted the price of gold back then to reflect the current purchasing price of the dollar. While we are still working on the data, a quick look suggests that, if history is a guide, gold has to break over $1,000 decisively to get the masses involved in the stocks. But when they do come, the returns are spectacular. We'll have more on the topic here, and in our other publications, in the near future.

A quick glance at the screen before signing off shows me that Wall Street is again painted red... and that gold, silver, many of the base metals, oil & gas are all higher.

It is especially gratifying to see gold come back so strongly from the whupping it took earlier this week, especially considering all the trash talk about our favorite metal of late. Including, most notably, Dennis Gartman who is calling for it to correct down to $810, though he nuances his comments by stating that even at that level, it would still be in a bull market and poised to surge again.

While we cannot predict the future, nor pretend to, neither can we yet see a scenario that does not favor gold reaching Bud Conrad's forecast of gold over $1,200 this year.

And that, fellow planetary travelers, is that for this week. As always, thank you for spending time with me today.

Next week I am going to endeavor to write an entire edition without mentioning the word "government" once. Until then...

Sincerely,

David Galland
Managing Director
Casey Research, LLC.

The Room : Economy

The Room – 07/10/2009

Opportunity Knocks

Playing the Bounce

Speaking of Unemployment

What Really Makes the World Go Round (and How to Profit from It)

Statehouses in the Poorhouses

Report from CYCLE

Too Funny

Miscellany

And That's That for This Week

The Room – 03/16/2009

Citi-Mae

Wen Is Enough?

Speaking of Exports

Snippets from the Swamp

Gold Stocks – a Knock at the Door

Miscellany

The Room - 10/24/2008

The Trial of Gold

Funeral for an Economy

How Long Will the Foreigners Support the Dollar?

Credit Sucks and Don't Forget It

Laughing Out Loud (When No One Else Is Looking)

Miscellany

The Room - 09/26/2008

The Bailout: Behind the Scenes

More Views on the Bailout From the Washington Post...

Quotes from the Quislings

About Those Foreigners...

A Musical Interlude

McPalin Is Toast

Miscellaney

Where Is the Economy Going in the Next Six Months?

Short Term Projections

The Battle for $900 Gold

The Room 4/14/08

Rising Commodity Prices and Inflation

Bad Speculators

Guess Who Will Soon Own 1,000,000 Homes? You Will!

The Ascent of Humanity

Watch Out Below

China's Olympic Torchture

And There's This...

Miscellany

That's It for This Week

The Room 3/24/08

"Commodities Drop, Rally in Dollar, Stocks Vindicate Bernanke"

What's Coming

Show Me the Money!

Energy Chart of the Week

China Still Is Selling Us More and More

Real Estate, Real Trouble

And That, Dear Readers, Is It for this Week...

The Room 3/17/08

The Best-Laid Plans

Geologists Rule!

Expert Reveals Wolves Pose No Danger to Sheep

Economists See US Avoiding Recession

Experts' Forecast Sees No Recession

Experts' Report Sees Negative First Quarter GDP

How You Know When the Economy Is in Trouble

Are You a Skeptic?

New Trend: The End of Printed Books

End Notes

And That's It for This Week...

The Room 3/10/08

The Right Way to Look at the U.S. Economy Today

Desperate Acts - Continued

Energy Chart of the Week

Bootstrapping It

Eye on Liechtenstein

And That's It for This Edition...

The Room 3/3/08

Bernanke Pushes the Button

Bud on Bernanke

A Trip Down Memory Lane

Energy Chart of the Week

The Other Important News of the Week

Visa's $19 Billion IPO a Scam?

What Really Makes the World Go Round
(and How to Profit from It)

The Solution to All That Ails the World
(But Don't Tell Anyone)!